Trump has made a mockery of many media sources, by exposing them doing their bullshit.
One of my favourite accomplishments, is that he doesn't mind being screeched at by the loudly-progressive, and joking back. The Women's March was a bit of a silly thing, but when he pointed out that it would get them to be more active, I thought the movement got quite a lot funnier.
You examine much of what people say here, to show how they are wrong. Have a look at your opinion of Trump having done nothing good.
Did he do what he was asked with regards to illegal immigration? Are the numbers improving, for those who voted for him?
It looks like he did...but my sources are not mainstream, so you might have a different view.
Who was the first US Presidential candidate to support gay marriage before being elected? I'll give you a hint, it wasn't done by Obama.
What about the weird occurrences of shithole countries murdering people for being gay?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/nation ... ty-n973081
Is that one you would oppose because Trump is bad?
I noticed you immediately looked for some reason to say that the good work wasn't Trump, and avoided mentioning the high-profile sex-trafficker arrests (Epstein being a most prominent one)
Why isn't that at all interesting? Is it because of the strong connections between his 'affection habits' and all those prominent Democrats and media figures?
Will you only get interested if Trump is implicated? Or is it pretty fucking good that they exposed the trafficking ring and it's connections?
The real worry for me is that smart Democrats will avoid looking at this, so it will be that much more of an effective republican attack than it would be otherwise. Just imagine how bad it would look if all these cases were lumped into a 'pedophile ring' catagory, and everyone associated finds themselves trying to defend against that. That is the threat (from Republicans) it looks like. Not the truth, but enough of a threat that it should be watched. If winning is important to them, I mean.
