US v Manafort

Post Reply
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
Posts: 19000
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
About me: Dijkbeschermer
Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
Contact:

Re: US v Manafort

Post by Scot Dutchy » Wed Mar 13, 2019 5:33 pm

And call girls I bet.
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: US v Manafort

Post by Forty Two » Wed Mar 13, 2019 7:52 pm

Tero wrote:
Wed Mar 13, 2019 5:27 pm
Will there be tennis and swimming in white collar prison? Minigolf?
Is he serving his time in the Netherlands?
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: US v Manafort

Post by Forty Two » Wed Mar 13, 2019 7:54 pm

New York State just indicted him. But, he'll make a "double jeopardy" fight. Prosecution for the same transaction/occurrence.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 73112
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: US v Manafort

Post by JimC » Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:19 pm

Our errant Cardinal only got 6 years for fucking under-age boys...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: US v Manafort

Post by Forty Two » Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:29 pm

Age is just a number.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: US v Manafort

Post by Jason » Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:41 pm

Big numbers don't fuck small numbers...

User avatar
Scot Dutchy
Posts: 19000
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
About me: Dijkbeschermer
Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
Contact:

Re: US v Manafort

Post by Scot Dutchy » Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:47 pm

In his world they do.
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: US v Manafort

Post by Hermit » Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:54 pm

JimC wrote:
Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:19 pm
Our errant Cardinal only got 6 years for fucking under-age boys...
'Twas only a mouthful, yer honour.

He'll be out on parole long before then. And there's an appeal pending...
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: US v Manafort

Post by Forty Two » Wed Mar 13, 2019 10:00 pm

Jason wrote:
Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:41 pm
Big numbers don't fuck small numbers...
You can't spell Lolita without "LOL"
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 73112
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: US v Manafort

Post by JimC » Thu Mar 14, 2019 1:59 am

Hermit wrote:
Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:54 pm
JimC wrote:
Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:19 pm
Our errant Cardinal only got 6 years for fucking under-age boys...
'Twas only a mouthful, yer honour.

He'll be out on parole long before then. And there's an appeal pending...
The appeal is in 3 months, with no indication of any release on bail during that time, so at least he'll do those months. I'm a little worried by the appeal, though...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: US v Manafort

Post by Hermit » Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:09 am

JimC wrote:
Thu Mar 14, 2019 1:59 am
Hermit wrote:
Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:54 pm
JimC wrote:
Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:19 pm
Our errant Cardinal only got 6 years for fucking under-age boys...
'Twas only a mouthful, yer honour.

He'll be out on parole long before then. And there's an appeal pending...
The appeal is in 3 months, with no indication of any release on bail during that time, so at least he'll do those months. I'm a little worried by the appeal, though...
Me too. People in that stratum of society have sufficient influence to organise a suitable judge to preside over the appeal. "Judge shopping" is a thing. Money need not necessarily be involved. An old boys network can suffice, manipulating certain levers in bureaucratic organisations.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: US v Manafort

Post by Forty Two » Mon Mar 18, 2019 1:02 pm

If the appeal is pending (filed) then there are already judges assigned, I would think. But that judge shopping can occur beforehand -- someone needs to bribe someone in the clerk's office to "randomly select" the right panel of judges. Of course, that's a pretty serious crime, so these matters are handled delicately, with plausible deniability.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: US v Manafort

Post by Hermit » Tue Mar 19, 2019 6:20 am

Forty Two wrote:
Mon Mar 18, 2019 1:02 pm
If the appeal is pending (filed) then there are already judges assigned, I would think. But that judge shopping can occur beforehand -- someone needs to bribe someone in the clerk's office to "randomly select" the right panel of judges. Of course, that's a pretty serious crime, so these matters are handled delicately, with plausible deniability.
There is a period between the announcement of the intention to lodge an appeal and the assignment of a judge. And no, bribery is not necessary. A sympathetic ear will do. Failing that, a threat or a promise might be in order, but it rarely comes to that.

Anyway, the Court of Appeal will hear Cardinal Pell’s application for leave to appeal on the 5th and 6th of June and, if it grants that first hurdle, the appeal itself. It could be weeks later that the Court of Appeal judges return to announce whether the challenge is successful. Plenty of time for musical chairs - judges inexplicably falling sick, sudden scheduling problems and a raft of other options are available to engage in a bit of shopping.

A solicitor I know told me about the occasion where the air contitioning broke down the day before a hearing. All other courts were booked out. The hearing had to be rescheduled. The assigned judges were not available on the new date. When their replacements were not deemed suitable by the plaintiff, the audio equipment ceased working and the hearing had to be postponed again, yes, with yet another set of judges. Then the plaintiff was hospitalised with some ailment. After that an important witness had died. No suspicious circumstances, but in the end the case was actually abandoned. Both sides agreed that the prospects of coming to a sensible conclusion had vanished.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: US v Manafort

Post by Hermit » Wed Aug 21, 2019 1:19 am

Contrary to my expectation Cardinal George Pell has lost his appeal at Victoria's Court of Appeal against his conviction of five sex crimes, on of which was sexual penetration of a child. Two of the three judges upheld the conviction. One of the 13 reasons given by his defence team was that the cardinal could not possibly have committed the offences because his clerical robes were too heavy to be moved aside to commit the sexual acts he was convicted of. Two of the three judges dismissed all 13. The six year jail sentence will remain, although its non-parole period runs out in October 2022.

Waiting now to hear that Pell will take the next step open to him: To lodge an appeal with the High Court in Canberra.

(Linkiepooh)
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 59377
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: US v Manafort

Post by pErvinalia » Wed Aug 21, 2019 1:33 am

I was glad to see the conviction upheld. The old fucker gets to spend more time in jail, at least until the anticipated high court appeal.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 13 guests