I guess he's really just going to move on without acknowledging any error, huh...Hermit wrote:You posted an outrageously quotemined piece, to which you then proceeded to add an absurd interpretation that does not even make sense after the question Clinton replied to was snipped. I called you out on that, and you now claim there's nothing to respond to? It looks to me that you're fleeing into a tanty in order to distract us from the fact that you can't find anything to defend your nonsense with.Forty Two wrote:There's nothing to respond to.Seabass wrote:And by the way, Hermit gave the correct interpretation. You gave the "alternative" interpretation—the one that supports the insane right-wing alternate reality perpetuated by all your favorite "news" sources like Infowars, Breitbart, Daily Caller, and "News Busters".
Honestly, I don't generally fault people for walking away from an argument after a few exchanges. At some point you have to agree to disagree and move on. But in this instance his error was so egregious, I kind of felt like a mea culpa was in order.