pErvin wrote:It appears from a couple of posts (and this thread) in the last couple of days that you are struggling with understanding written English.
LOL, of course.... funny, everybody you talk to (if they disagree with you) has a hard time with understanding the language.
pErvin wrote:
I've provided reasoning for why it can be considered racist.
Almost anything "can be" racist, depending on the intent or motive of the person involved. The key assertion here is that it was racist. Is there any proof of which you are aware that it was, in fact, racist, as opposed to mere potentially or possibly racist?
pErvin wrote:
You haven't addressed most of my points. You have proffered an empty assertion that it can't be racist, despite me showing you an analogy to help you out of the broken thinking that you seem to be suffering from. An analogy that you have failed to address a number of times now. Take your medication and get back to me if you want to have a proper debate. Until then I see no need to continue this conversation while you repeatedly ignore rebuttals to your points. Ironic that you have castigated 42 for doing just this in the last day or so. I'd suggest those in glasshouses shouldn't throw stones.
Take your medication....lol...coming from you, that's hilarious.
And, oh, please...please... please discontinue your involvement in this conversation...please. It would be so much easier to actually discuss the issues if you were not peppering the thread with your usual insults and diversions.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar