Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1n294SI8gChristian student quits school choir in protest at song 'praising Allah'
I think I would quit because the song is disturbing.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1n294SI8gChristian student quits school choir in protest at song 'praising Allah'
What would be your view if the song was "Onward Christian Soldiers, Marching As to War?"apophenia wrote:As noted, both particular songs and the choir itself are voluntary, so the young man is simply trying to draw attention to himself. I'm not sure what pedagogic purpose is served by singing multicultural religious songs, but the director seems to think there is some. Having worshipped at a Unitarian Universalist church, where singing the hymns made me feel like I was being brain washed, I'm inclined toward putting religious music (with religious lyrical content) in the same category as prayer and have it be off limits. However, I doubt you would find support uniformly against religious music from all religions, and namely from Christianity, so it reveals once again, the religious double standard.
I find it disturbing. It sounds like it would have fit in perfectly with the Lord of the Rings - any scene when the orcs are marching or preparing to do battle against the forces of good.apophenia wrote: I don't find the song disturbing so much as dull, monotonous and grating. I believe my musical education started in the fourth grade. Each Friday, it would be student choice day, and in order, people would get to pick a song they wanted to hear. Whenever it came my time to pick, everybody groaned, because I always picked African drum music. They hated it.
The problem with that, is that if this Muslim song declaring that Allah is the only God and all others are to be destroyed, etc., is that it will be considered license for school boards throughout the Bible belt to include fundamentalist Christian hymns from the local church concordance to be sung in school Why not? it's our religious heritage.eXcommunicate wrote:I see no reason to prohibit the singing of religious music, Christian, Muslim, or otherwise, even in a public school choir. As Dawkins himself has said, our culture has a religious heritage and it is right to learn about it. In choir you learn about vocal music and how to sing. Religiously-themed music is a huge part of our musical heritage. Likewise, where is the harm in learning the musical heritage of another culture? This whole "controversy" is rather silly.
As an aside, I find it hilarious that the Daily Wail's website is just crawling with American fundamentalists.
My first reaction as well.Jesus_of_Nazareth wrote:But next week it will be compulsory to sing the song when at a Council Meeting.
Anyone can walk out - but they risk getting killed.
FACT.
Religious music is a part of our heritage as a nation, and many nations. So are unions, Marxism, and any number of things. If the majority of the choir's repertoire was Islamic, or Christian, or religious, then I would have a problem with it, but this is not the case. You will never have a comprehensive musical education, especially choral, without performing some religiously-themed music. I couldn't imagine you objecting to the school orchestra performing Beethoven's Ode to Joy or the concert band playing Holsinger's Ballet Sacra. If you do, then we have zero common ground here.Coito ergo sum wrote:The problem with that, is that if this Muslim song declaring that Allah is the only God and all others are to be destroyed, etc., is that it will be considered license for school boards throughout the Bible belt to include fundamentalist Christian hymns from the local church concordance to be sung in school Why not? it's our religious heritage.eXcommunicate wrote:I see no reason to prohibit the singing of religious music, Christian, Muslim, or otherwise, even in a public school choir. As Dawkins himself has said, our culture has a religious heritage and it is right to learn about it. In choir you learn about vocal music and how to sing. Religiously-themed music is a huge part of our musical heritage. Likewise, where is the harm in learning the musical heritage of another culture? This whole "controversy" is rather silly.
As an aside, I find it hilarious that the Daily Wail's website is just crawling with American fundamentalists.
Where are you getting this from? I see nothing in the article which suggests the lyrics contain anything suggesting destroying other gods/religions. Coupled with the fact you somehow get the images of Orcs marching, about to invade, while I'm picking up something quite different, quite the opposite in fact, I suspect you are hearing what you want to hear. You do realise the composer is this guy?Coito ergo sum wrote:The problem with that, is that if this Muslim song declaring that Allah is the only God and all others are to be destroyed, etc., is that it will be considered license for school boards throughout the Bible belt to include fundamentalist Christian hymns from the local church concordance to be sung in school Why not? it's our religious heritage.eXcommunicate wrote:I see no reason to prohibit the singing of religious music, Christian, Muslim, or otherwise, even in a public school choir. As Dawkins himself has said, our culture has a religious heritage and it is right to learn about it. In choir you learn about vocal music and how to sing. Religiously-themed music is a huge part of our musical heritage. Likewise, where is the harm in learning the musical heritage of another culture? This whole "controversy" is rather silly.
As an aside, I find it hilarious that the Daily Wail's website is just crawling with American fundamentalists.
Seems to me, in context, to be about God being the only thing that lasts (unlike, say, family, friends, love, looks, wealth, fame or glory).
Allaah is the only One who is eternal and immortal and rest are perishable and will be destroyed by Allaah
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], macdoc and 20 guests