California's new lightbulb rules...

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

California's new lightbulb rules...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:29 pm

"Consumers will still have the amount of light they need for the task at hand,'' said Gottlieb. "But they'll see lower electricity bills.''
http://www.mercurynews.com/science/ci_1 ... ck_check=1

Such government "double talk." LOL - oh, yeah - nothing has changed, of course - you'll still have plenty of light --- all we've done is reduced your electric bill! Wonderful for all....

Of course, anyone who wanted a lower wattage bulb wasn't prohibited from buying them before. So, all they've done,in reality, is prohibited the purchase and sale of brighter bulbs. They've just made a determination that people don't need bulbs that bright. But, of course, they phrase it as if they've just done you a favor, and that all they've done is reduced your electric bill...

Trolldor
Gargling with Nails
Posts: 15878
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 am
Contact:

Re: California's new lightbulb rules...

Post by Trolldor » Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:31 pm

*shrug*

Again, don't care. The "consumer" loses nothing.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: California's new lightbulb rules...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:34 pm

Trolldor wrote:*shrug*

Again, don't care. The "consumer" loses nothing.
Except the brighter bulb that, apparently, they wanted since they were buying it before.

User avatar
normal
!
!
Posts: 9071
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:23 pm
About me: meh
Location: North, and then some
Contact:

Re: California's new lightbulb rules...

Post by normal » Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:42 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
Trolldor wrote:*shrug*

Again, don't care. The "consumer" loses nothing.
Except the brighter bulb that, apparently, they wanted since they were buying it before.
Maybe they were buying them because they were idiots and didn't know better.

100 watt bulbs are madness anyway. Unless you're using it while doing carpentry or other construction. But then the 1000 watt buckets are better suited :tup:
Image
Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable, let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   -Douglas Adams

User avatar
Atheist-Lite
Formerly known as Crumple
Posts: 8745
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:35 pm
About me: You need a jetpack? Here, take mine. I don't need a jetpack this far away.
Location: In the Galactic Hub, Yes That One !!!
Contact:

Re: California's new lightbulb rules...

Post by Atheist-Lite » Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:44 pm

Get LEDs. That'll give you plenty of light and are very effecient. A bit more expensive but their intense - the heavy metal of light bulbs. :pop:
nxnxm,cm,m,fvmf,vndfnm,nm,f,dvm,v v vmfm,vvm,d,dd vv sm,mvd,fmf,fn ,v fvfm,

User avatar
Millefleur
Sugar Nips
Posts: 7752
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:10 am
About me: I like buttons. Shiny, shiny buttons.
Location: In a box.
Contact:

Re: California's new lightbulb rules...

Post by Millefleur » Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:44 pm

Energy saving lightbulbs? :dunno: We've had them in our house for ages, between 40 and 100 watt equivalent brightness.
Men! They're all beasts!
Yeah. But isn't it wonderful?

Image

User avatar
normal
!
!
Posts: 9071
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:23 pm
About me: meh
Location: North, and then some
Contact:

Re: California's new lightbulb rules...

Post by normal » Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:47 pm

For construction purposes, 1000w flood light:
Image
Image
Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable, let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   -Douglas Adams

PsychoSerenity
"I" Self-Perceive Recursively
Posts: 7824
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:57 am
Contact:

Re: California's new lightbulb rules...

Post by PsychoSerenity » Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:57 pm

Millefleur wrote:Energy saving lightbulbs? :dunno: We've had them in our house for ages, between 40 and 100 watt equivalent brightness.
;this:
California is already the nation's leader in energy-efficiency standards.
And yet they're still using traditional incandescent light bulbs?! - get with the times America!
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: California's new lightbulb rules...

Post by mistermack » Mon Jan 03, 2011 2:50 pm

I don't see where they get their prices for bulbs in that article.
Here in the UK, we have pound shops and 99p shops, where everything is the same price.
They have been stocking fluorescent energy-saving bulbs for a couple of years now.
11w is the equivalent of a traditional 60 watt, and 18w give the same light as an old 100w.
For a pound each. And they last four or five times longer. How come they are so expensive in California?
.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Millefleur
Sugar Nips
Posts: 7752
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:10 am
About me: I like buttons. Shiny, shiny buttons.
Location: In a box.
Contact:

Re: California's new lightbulb rules...

Post by Millefleur » Mon Jan 03, 2011 2:56 pm

mistermack wrote:I don't see where they get their prices for bulbs in that article.
Here in the UK, we have pound shops and 99p shops, where everything is the same price.
They have been stocking fluorescent energy-saving bulbs for a couple of years now.
11w is the equivalent of a traditional 60 watt, and 18w give the same light as an old 100w.
For a pound each. And they last four or five times longer. How come they are so expensive in California?
.
Indeed :think: I bought regular incandescent bulbs (wrere out of dimmable energy savers), 2 x 60w for about 60p in Sainsburys the other week, and on the same day bought a load of different wattage energy savers from Poundstretcher, £1.29 for each pack of 3.
Men! They're all beasts!
Yeah. But isn't it wonderful?

Image

User avatar
Atheist-Lite
Formerly known as Crumple
Posts: 8745
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:35 pm
About me: You need a jetpack? Here, take mine. I don't need a jetpack this far away.
Location: In the Galactic Hub, Yes That One !!!
Contact:

Re: California's new lightbulb rules...

Post by Atheist-Lite » Mon Jan 03, 2011 2:59 pm

Millefleur wrote:
mistermack wrote:I don't see where they get their prices for bulbs in that article.
Here in the UK, we have pound shops and 99p shops, where everything is the same price.
They have been stocking fluorescent energy-saving bulbs for a couple of years now.
11w is the equivalent of a traditional 60 watt, and 18w give the same light as an old 100w.
For a pound each. And they last four or five times longer. How come they are so expensive in California?
.
Indeed :think: I bought regular incandescent bulbs (wrere out of dimmable energy savers), 2 x 60w for about 60p in Sainsburys the other week, and on the same day bought a load of different wattage energy savers from Poundstretcher, £1.29 for each pack of 3.
They've got strict pollution laws in the Us where's here it is only suggested to dispose of the mercury laden wrecks. Mine goes in with the potato peel like most everyone elses. :whistle:
nxnxm,cm,m,fvmf,vndfnm,nm,f,dvm,v v vmfm,vvm,d,dd vv sm,mvd,fmf,fn ,v fvfm,

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: California's new lightbulb rules...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon Jan 03, 2011 3:06 pm

Kevin wrote:
Millefleur wrote:
mistermack wrote:I don't see where they get their prices for bulbs in that article.
Here in the UK, we have pound shops and 99p shops, where everything is the same price.
They have been stocking fluorescent energy-saving bulbs for a couple of years now.
11w is the equivalent of a traditional 60 watt, and 18w give the same light as an old 100w.
For a pound each. And they last four or five times longer. How come they are so expensive in California?
.
Indeed :think: I bought regular incandescent bulbs (wrere out of dimmable energy savers), 2 x 60w for about 60p in Sainsburys the other week, and on the same day bought a load of different wattage energy savers from Poundstretcher, £1.29 for each pack of 3.
They've got strict pollution laws in the Us where's here it is only suggested to dispose of the mercury laden wrecks. Mine goes in with the potato peel like most everyone elses. :whistle:
You mean you don't follow the EPA's simple instructions regarding recycling and cleanup of dangerous CFL's? http://www.epa.gov/cfl/cflrecycling.html

And, the CFL's can break and cause an environmental cleanup hazard in your house....
Here's a three-page instruction sheet on what to do if your compact fluorescent bulb breaks in your house: http://www.epa.gov/cfl/cflcleanup.pdf or http://www.epa.gov/cfl/cflcleanup-detailed.html

I've got an easier procedure: don't put CFLs in the house in the first place. Done. :biggrin:

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: California's new lightbulb rules...

Post by maiforpeace » Mon Jan 03, 2011 3:14 pm

mistermack wrote:I don't see where they get their prices for bulbs in that article.
Here in the UK, we have pound shops and 99p shops, where everything is the same price.
They have been stocking fluorescent energy-saving bulbs for a couple of years now.
11w is the equivalent of a traditional 60 watt, and 18w give the same light as an old 100w.
For a pound each. And they last four or five times longer. How come they are so expensive in California?
.
We have the same stores here too...Dollar Stores, and they sell those cheap incandescent lightbulbs too. I even saw them at Kmart the other day, three for $1.29. The price they quoted in the article is probably suggested retail, for a name brand light bulb, like General Electric.

Why do you rail about what we do in California, CES? You don't live here. This stuff gets passed for a reason...because the citizens of California support it Is your own state government that weak that you fear California might set a precedent you can't vote out?

As for the strict pollution laws...it's easy enough to dispose of those bulbs here - either at the recycling center, or to any local hardware store, or box hardware store. Some hardware stores even give you a a discount to buy new bulbs if you recycle your old ones. What's the big deal? We should be doing the same thing with disposable batteries as well.
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: California's new lightbulb rules...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon Jan 03, 2011 3:37 pm

maiforpeace wrote:
mistermack wrote:I don't see where they get their prices for bulbs in that article.
Here in the UK, we have pound shops and 99p shops, where everything is the same price.
They have been stocking fluorescent energy-saving bulbs for a couple of years now.
11w is the equivalent of a traditional 60 watt, and 18w give the same light as an old 100w.
For a pound each. And they last four or five times longer. How come they are so expensive in California?
.
We have the same stores here too...Dollar Stores, and they sell those cheap incandescent lightbulbs too. I even saw them at Kmart the other day, three for $1.29. The price they quoted in the article is probably suggested retail, for a name brand light bulb, like General Electric.

Why do you rail about what we do in California, CES? You don't live here. This stuff gets passed for a reason...because the citizens of California support it Is your own state government that weak that you fear California might set a precedent you can't vote out?
The only thing I railed against was the bullshit double-talk. See the OP.
maiforpeace wrote:
As for the strict pollution laws...it's easy enough to dispose of those bulbs here - either at the recycling center, or to any local hardware store, or box hardware store. Some hardware stores even give you a a discount to buy new bulbs if you recycle your old ones. What's the big deal? We should be doing the same thing with disposable batteries as well.
But, make sure if one breaks on your floor you send the kids to grannie's house for the night, and bring in a professional clean-up crew to deal with the mercury. Follow the three page instructions to avoid further contamination, and throw away any clothing and shoes that may have come in contact with the broken bulb or residue from inside the bulb....

Plus, fuck the US workers - GE has been behind all the "must use CFL" legislation in the US:
GE is promoting new, energy-saving bulbs known as compact fluorescents, or CFLs, which are made in China. These bulbs last longer and use less energy than the typical incandescent bulbs found in most U.S. homes—but they can cost up to 10 times as much.

If GE has its way, it will no longer manufacture light bulbs in the United States. Since 1980, employment in GE lighting plants in this country has dropped by 68 percent. If everyone switched to the Chinese-made CFL bulbs, all U.S. plants would close.
http://blog.aflcio.org/2007/05/12/ge-wo ... hina-bulb/

GE Closes Last Incandescent Light Bulb Plant, Jobs Sent to China http://www.heartland.org/full/28516/GE_ ... China.html

And, by buying the CFL's you support the killing of workers in China:
CFLs contain mercury, like other fluorescents, in order to function. Mercury is a well-known toxin, and mercury vapor can cause serious damage to the central nervous system. Though the amount of mercury in a CFL is small, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recommends opening a window and leaving the room for at least 15 minutes before beginning clean-up of a broken bulb.
Yet workers at the Topstar plant do not get "a detailed account of work dangers" as their contracts stipulate, receive little safety training, and often do not know basic facts about factory safety. The majority of workers interviewed told researchers they had no idea that the company was using mercury, or how to protect themselves. Told the meaning of the character for mercury, or gong, they said there were many plastic barrels on which "discarded objects containing gong" was written in red. The barrels were filled with CFLs and often were open or not properly sealed.

Experienced workers end up with swollen fingers from repeatedly pricking themselves with electronic components they are plugging in. Workers reported that when they finish their shifts, they ache all over and their legs have gone numb. One veteran worker said, "Ah, after more than a year [here], I am more or less numb all over and have become a machine!" Other workers interviewed made similar comments.
http://www.policymattersohio.org/GoodBulbsBadJobs.htm

And, http://www.science20.com/make_love_not_ ... ls_concern
Thousands of Chinese factory workers who manufacture 'environmentally friendly' mercury compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) for export to first world countries have been poisoned and hospitalized because of mercury exposure over the last decade

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: California's new lightbulb rules...

Post by maiforpeace » Mon Jan 03, 2011 3:50 pm

Capitalism at it's finest...god forbid we should do anything to control it, eh? ;)
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Woodbutcher and 17 guests