On the Topic of Hate Speech Laws

[Robert_S]

OK, how about someone saying "Lets go down to the Discovery Channel with some guns and bombs and have a wild party!"

[Coito ergo sum]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEkelAsm ... ture=feedu[/youtube]

[Cunt]

Not everyone is losing these battles...
http://vimeo.com/5189274

Although 'winning' meant he wasted lots of time and pissed away over 100,000 bucks

[Seth]

I can only applaud this gentleman:

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn ... peech_laws

He explains quite succinctly why the nonsense about insulting people for genetic characteristics or "inciting hatred" or whatever nonsense these bullshit hate speech laws claim to be based on is just that - nonsense. Inciting hatred is a fundamental right, and must remain a fundamental right, and we should all be very much opposed to State power being used against the free expression of ideas.

This is part of a "hate speech" investigation:



I applaud this man's big "fuck you!" to this bureaucrat pig. Fuck her and fucking agency.

EDIT: scary shit, this. The above is how the State shuts the people up. It is too much for most individuals to bear to be hauled in before a bitch like this - the stress, the fear, the cost, etc. - so they guard and measure what they say to make sure they can't even be accused of insulting anyone. And, it allows the squeaking wheels, like the piece of shit Muslims who filed the complaint the above case, to control public discourse.

"What's my "intent" in saying or publishing? I'll give you my intent RIGHT HERE! My intent is to insult your fucking delicate sensibilities! Fuck off!"

Can't fault the guy's response to her questions .. very well said.

Coito, I wouldn't be so harsh on the interviewer, who was just doing her job. I wonder if his response was an eye-opener for her ...

What was the outcome for Levant?

Fuck the cunt. "All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

My response would have been "Go fuck yourself you fat cow, I'm not answering any of your questions, I have a right to remain silent. Prosecute me in open court or fuck off and die!"

[Toontown]

Shit. Move over Big Brother. Here come Little Bitch Sister.

[Coito ergo sum]

Shit. Move over Big Brother. Here come Little Bitch Sister.

It's a sick and disgusting state of affairs when such a thing can happen in a country like Canada.

[Seth]

Shit. Move over Big Brother. Here come Little Bitch Sister.

It's a sick and disgusting state of affairs when such a thing can happen in a country like Canada.

I've never seen such a reprehensible display of flat-out lying by a government agent. The publisher had her number. She was on a fishing expedition of monumental proportions. She wanted him to incriminate himself. What amazes me is what the fuck was his lawyer doing? Or not doing? I'd have been all over every single question she asked with a "Don't answer that!"

What the hell is up with the Canadian justice system?

[Coito ergo sum]

That's an administrative investigation that might not be considered "criminal." I haven't looked into it, but maybe there is no right to remain silent that venue in Canada. Maybe a knowledgeable Canuck can clarify.

I wonder what happened, ultimately, in that case....

[devogue]

I can only applaud this gentleman:

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn ... peech_laws

He explains quite succinctly why the nonsense about insulting people for genetic characteristics or "inciting hatred" or whatever nonsense these bullshit hate speech laws claim to be based on is just that - nonsense. Inciting hatred is a fundamental right, and must remain a fundamental right, and we should all be very much opposed to State power being used against the free expression of ideas.

This is part of a "hate speech" investigation:



I applaud this man's big "fuck you!" to this bureaucrat pig. Fuck her and fucking agency.

EDIT: scary shit, this. The above is how the State shuts the people up. It is too much for most individuals to bear to be hauled in before a bitch like this - the stress, the fear, the cost, etc. - so they guard and measure what they say to make sure they can't even be accused of insulting anyone. And, it allows the squeaking wheels, like the piece of shit Muslims who filed the complaint the above case, to control public discourse.

"What's my "intent" in saying or publishing? I'll give you my intent RIGHT HERE! My intent is to insult your fucking delicate sensibilities! Fuck off!"

Can't fault the guy's response to her questions .. very well said.

Coito, I wouldn't be so harsh on the interviewer, who was just doing her job. I wonder if his response was an eye-opener for her ...

What was the outcome for Levant?

Fuck the cunt. "All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

My response would have been "Go fuck yourself you fat cow, I'm not answering any of your questions, I have a right to remain silent. Prosecute me in open court or fuck off and die!"

She's sue you for hurting her feelings.

[Seth]

That's an administrative investigation that might not be considered "criminal." I haven't looked into it, but maybe there is no right to remain silent that venue in Canada. Maybe a knowledgeable Canuck can clarify.

I wonder what happened, ultimately, in that case....

I'd like to know too. I heard a pub owner was fined a thousand bucks (loonies) for insulting Indians.

Fucking idiots.

[Coito ergo sum]

That's an administrative investigation that might not be considered "criminal." I haven't looked into it, but maybe there is no right to remain silent that venue in Canada. Maybe a knowledgeable Canuck can clarify.

I wonder what happened, ultimately, in that case....

I'd like to know too. I heard a pub owner was fined a thousand bucks (loonies) for insulting Indians.

Fucking idiots.

What did he do? Put up a cigar store Indian or something?

[Seth]

That's an administrative investigation that might not be considered "criminal." I haven't looked into it, but maybe there is no right to remain silent that venue in Canada. Maybe a knowledgeable Canuck can clarify.

I wonder what happened, ultimately, in that case....

I'd like to know too. I heard a pub owner was fined a thousand bucks (loonies) for insulting Indians.

Fucking idiots.

What did he do? Put up a cigar store Indian or something?

As I recall, he pronounced in his own fucking pub that Indians were lazy. Or some such innocuous calumny.

[Coito ergo sum]

That's an administrative investigation that might not be considered "criminal." I haven't looked into it, but maybe there is no right to remain silent that venue in Canada. Maybe a knowledgeable Canuck can clarify.

I wonder what happened, ultimately, in that case....

I'd like to know too. I heard a pub owner was fined a thousand bucks (loonies) for insulting Indians.

Fucking idiots.

What did he do? Put up a cigar store Indian or something?

As I recall, he pronounced in his own fucking pub that Indians were lazy. Or some such innocuous calumny.

What if the Indians he was talking about were actually lazy? Would truth serve as a defense?

[Cunt]

Truth is not a defence. Please watch the whole video of Ezra Lavants 900 Day ordeal for the surprizing end.

[sandinista]

That's an administrative investigation that might not be considered "criminal." I haven't looked into it, but maybe there is no right to remain silent that venue in Canada. Maybe a knowledgeable Canuck can clarify.

I wonder what happened, ultimately, in that case....

I'd like to know too. I heard a pub owner was fined a thousand bucks (loonies) for insulting Indians.

Fucking idiots.

Heard where? Fined by who? What would happen in the US if a pub owner insulted black people?