An independent Scotland?
- mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
- Contact:
Re: An independent Scotland?
So he should have promised to have a vote in ten years time then? Because that wouldn't be delaying it, because that's what he said, right? I bet he wishes he had now.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
Re: An independent Scotland?
mistermack wrote:So he should have promised to have a vote in ten years time then? Because that wouldn't be delaying it, because that's what he said, right? I bet he wishes he had now.

You claimed he went back on his promise.mistermack wrote:Once the SNP, the party that is pushing for separation, and promised a referendum, got elected, it was also perfectly respectable to demand that smarmy Alex put his money where his mouth was, and hold the promised referendum.
He campaigned on that promise.
He is the one that went backwards on his promise, by the absolute maximum that he could. Because he knows that if he held it any sooner, he would definitely lose.
- mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
- Contact:
Re: An independent Scotland?
That's just a lie. Unless you really are thick. I really didn't think this could get any dumber. But it has.ronmcd wrote: You claimed he went back on his promise.
You don't know the difference between backwards and back?
Jesus Christ!
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
Re: An independent Scotland?
mistermack wrote:That's just a lie. Unless you really are thick. I really didn't think this could get any dumber. But it has.ronmcd wrote: You claimed he went back on his promise.
You don't know the difference between backwards and back?
Jesus Christ!

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 25 guests