klr wrote:Maybe he could have used a mobile phone (cell phone to you colonials) ... not to call for help, but to scare the croc. After all, it works with Polar Bears:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-24022893
Have you tasted croc meat?Cormac wrote:Tasty though!JimC wrote:Collector said something earlier in the thread that I can agree to to a certain extent. People doing these sorts of adventurous activities should be prepared and self-reliant, not dependent on others (or government agencies) to get them out of trouble.
However, in this situation, a gun was not the correct form of preparation. You don't protect yourself against crocodile attack in northern Australia with a firearm, but by sensible behaviour and the right equipment (in this case, a run-about with an outboard motor instead of a canoe). By being alert, camping a fair distance from the waters edge, having plenty of water etc, one could enjoy being Robinson Crusoe on one of these isolated island. (BTW, crocodiles are a protected species, shooting them is against the law as well as unnecessary.)
In other outback contexts, a rifle would be useful - there are many feral animals that need shooting (e.g.. pigs, goats, foxes), and recreational hunters can have a great time while being useful to the environment as well...
ehhhhmmmm.
If we had a 5th Amendment a la the US Constitution, I might plead it, depending...
(Ah - I've just read Jim's next post - so, yes. Yes, I have eaten of the crocodile. Farmed ones, I'm sure).
...of course, it could have been chicken...