All Things Trump: the story continues...

[Joe]

It gives new meaning to the word "slacks."

[Tero]

Free shipping!

[Joe]

Confirming the liberal bias of fact checkers, Snopes, Politifact, NPR, USA Today, The Wrap, People, Yahoo.com, New York Magazine, and Black Enterprise all report that Trump did have his pants on right at that rally.

Nothing about a diaper though.

[Tero]

CNN)Never-before-heard audio, obtained exclusively by CNN, shows how former President Donald Trump's longtime adviser Rudy Giuliani relentlessly pressured and coaxed the Ukrainian government in 2019 to investigate baseless conspiracies about then-candidate Joe Biden.

During the roughly 40-minute call, Giuliani repeatedly told Yermak that Zelensky should publicly announce investigations into possible corruption by Biden in Ukraine, and into claims that Ukraine meddled in the 2016 election to hurt Trump. (These separate claims are both untrue.)

https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/07/politics ... index.html

[Hermit]

Confirming the liberal bias of fact checkers, Snopes, Politifact, NPR, USA Today, The Wrap, People, Yahoo.com, New York Magazine, and Black Enterprise all report that Trump did have his pants on right at that rally.

Nothing about a diaper though.

TYT spent six minutes on the deplorable manipulation of the video too.

[Tero]

$23.99
Review: His wig/hair rises up and he says one of several phrases. Some of the best ones were, "Take that Putin", "That fart was made in China", "That wasn't me, it was ISIS", and "That's what I call a twoot. Trademarked". The attention to detail is spot on. The tan skin/white eyes, signature red necktie, and fluffy hair really takes the doll to the next level. The best part of the entire gift exchange was my dad sternly telling my daughters, "I'm leaving now. Gimme back my doll!" It was spontaneous and hysterical. I highly recommend to any trump fan or foe.

[Joe]

Confirming the liberal bias of fact checkers, Snopes, Politifact, NPR, USA Today, The Wrap, People, Yahoo.com, New York Magazine, and Black Enterprise all report that Trump did have his pants on right at that rally.

Nothing about a diaper though.

TYT spent six minutes on the deplorable manipulation of the video too.

Their point about truth no matter what you want is a good one. I'm sure the aurora is interfering with YouTube again so our member from Yellowknife can't watch.

I'm with TYT though. I don't get why Trump wears those crappy shiny suits either. They're wrinkle magnets, and look cheap. It's amazing that he wears that ill-fitting garbage when he can afford real quality clothing.

[Tero]

Maybe the style was attractive to him when he saw his mafia friends wearing it? He even likes wrestling.

[Cunt]

The aurora doesn't interfere with it. A metered connection, and limited screen time mean I mostly consume audio. For diaper vids, I go to a better production source.

[Hermit]

The aurora doesn't interfere with it. A metered connection, and limited screen time mean I mostly consume audio.

Nah. You just don't like watching stuff that does not harmonise with your bias. If you watch the hour plus Weinstein/Heyer videos you keep feeding us links to you should be able to afford watching 6 minute videos we provide links to.

[Joe]

Use whatever excuse you like. I like the aurora better. It's more colorful than yours, and equally BS.

[Cunt]

Use whatever excuse you like. I like the aurora better. It's more colorful than yours, and equally BS.

I'll stop believing you, too.

Should be nicer here. Trying to understand each other sure isn't going anywhere.

[Hermit]

Use whatever excuse you like. I like the aurora better. It's more colorful than yours, and equally BS.

I'll stop believing you, too.

Should be nicer here. Trying to understand each other sure isn't going anywhere.

There is a difference between understanding and believing. It would be easier to believe you if you did not spread so many utter distortions, outrageously far-fetched misinterpretations and outright lies.

I have no way of knowing if you do so because you exercise your critical faculty only in regard to stuff that counters your biases while you instantly become a credulous and gullible babe in the woods at the sight of stuff that harmonises with them, or intentionally, so I leave that question in the pigeonhole labelled "I don't know the answer to that".

[Tero]

Democrat Garland a disappointment as attorney general.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/07/politics ... index.html

New York (CNN)The Justice Department argued in a brief filed Monday that it should be permitted to substitute itself for former President Donald Trump as defendant in a defamation lawsuit brought by a longtime magazine columnist, E. Jean Carroll, who accused him of rape, continuing the argument it had initiated under the previous administration even as the White House has changed hands.

"Then-President Trump's response to Ms. Carroll's serious allegations of sexual assault included statements that questioned her credibility in terms that were crude and disrespectful," Justice Department lawyers wrote in a brief to the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals. "But this case does not concern whether Mr. Trump's response was appropriate. Nor does it turn on the truthfulness of Ms. Carroll's allegations."
Rather, the lawyers wrote, because they believe Trump was an employee of the government and that he acted "within the scope of employment," the department, rather than Trump personally, should serve as defendant in the case.

In October, a district judge rejected the Justice Department's attempt to replace Trump in the lawsuit. If the department had been allowed to intervene in the case, that likely would have led to its dismissal, because the government cannot be sued for defamation.
Carroll's lawsuit alleges that Trump defamed her when he denied raping her, said she wasn't his type and claimed she had made the allegation to boost sales of her new book.

(the rape itself is not in the case, only what Trump said)

[Joe]

Use whatever excuse you like. I like the aurora better. It's more colorful than yours, and equally BS.

I'll stop believing you, too.

Should be nicer here. Trying to understand each other sure isn't going anywhere.

If you were interested in understanding, you'd have asked Hermit to point at the audio version of the podcast, or to summarize their points. Where there's a will there's a way.

But you've already admitted you just won't watch most videos we link, so why should I think you have any interest in understanding.