The Thread of Democrats

Post Reply
User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: The Thread of Democrats

Post by Hermit » Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:47 pm

Forty Two wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 1:20 pm
Hermit wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:23 am
Cunt wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:56 am
I simply thought 70% sounded like something no-one would work for.
It is always good to think, but it is always much better to think in conjunction with knowledge of facts. In this case the fact is that millions - and millionaires among them - did not find the top marginal personal income rate of 90% to be a disincentive to work or an incentive to flee the country. With a bit of research you would have found out that not only did they refuse to work - they also did rather well during that tax regime which held sway between 1945 and 1964. Those two decades were a period of unparalleled material wellbeing in the history of the US. Think about it.
Is the argument that the well-being after World War 2 in the US was caused in part by a 90% marginal tax rate? That's what spurs economic well-being?
No. The whole tenor of my previous two posts was that things were going rather well despite the 90% top marginal personal income tax and the 50% corporate tax rates. If you see the argument as those rates causing economic well-being you'll need to quote the relevant phrases that say so.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: The Thread of Democrats

Post by Forty Two » Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:51 pm

Just listen to Schumer's own words --
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: The Thread of Democrats

Post by Rum » Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:55 pm

The narrator might consider moderating his cocaine his.

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: The Thread of Democrats

Post by Forty Two » Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:57 pm

Indeed - just listen to Schumer. What's he saying?
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: The Thread of Democrats

Post by Rum » Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:59 pm

He’s a politician. On balance he appears rather more to the left than you. So what?

User avatar
Cunt
Lumpy Vagina Bloodfart
Posts: 19069
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:10 am
Contact:

Re: The Thread of Democrats

Post by Cunt » Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:11 pm

It's ok, Democrats HAVE to support this new Socialist/Communist lady. Ellen has been dethroned as Dem-Queen, Hillary was a failure. They just watched their Ruthie die...they NEED someone to cling to (and it certainly isn't going to be that old white guy, Bernie Sanders)
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists


Joe wrote:
Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:22 pm
he doesn't communicate
Free speech anywhere, is a threat to tyrants everywhere.

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: The Thread of Democrats

Post by Forty Two » Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:12 pm

He's in favor of everything Trump wants -- at least he was, until Trump wanted it.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Cunt
Lumpy Vagina Bloodfart
Posts: 19069
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:10 am
Contact:

Re: The Thread of Democrats

Post by Cunt » Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:15 pm

Forty Two wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:51 pm
Just listen to Schumer's own words --
"who could oppose that?"

Funny shit.

I just listened to a podcast by Sam Harris, where he interviewed a lady who studied the Russian interference in the US election. She studied a group called 'IRA', and they (like this ass-clown) would play both sides of any given issue, looking for what worked (on social media, it's 'engagement', in politics, the measures might be different)

It doesn't surprise me at all that he has argued effectively for both sides of this issue. I wonder what he really thinks, though.

He clearly likes the time off, but what is less clear is whether this is a principled stand, a party one, or a selfish greed one.
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists


Joe wrote:
Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:22 pm
he doesn't communicate
Free speech anywhere, is a threat to tyrants everywhere.

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41016
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: The Thread of Democrats

Post by Svartalf » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:54 pm

Forty Two wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:38 pm
I self-flagellate while chanting "pie Jesu domine, dona eis requiem."
Help, I'm being repressed!
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Cunt
Lumpy Vagina Bloodfart
Posts: 19069
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:10 am
Contact:

Re: The Thread of Democrats

Post by Cunt » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:55 pm

I found this democrat professor, who was recently interviewed by Mr. Rubin.

Check out her outrageous, lefty claims here -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upBP2UYyRZU
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists


Joe wrote:
Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:22 pm
he doesn't communicate
Free speech anywhere, is a threat to tyrants everywhere.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60689
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: The Thread of Democrats

Post by pErvinalia » Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:28 pm

Forty Two wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 1:20 pm
Hermit wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:23 am
Cunt wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:56 am
I simply thought 70% sounded like something no-one would work for.
It is always good to think, but it is always much better to think in conjunction with knowledge of facts. In this case the fact is that millions - and millionaires among them - did not find the top marginal personal income rate of 90% to be a disincentive to work or an incentive to flee the country. With a bit of research you would have found out that not only did they refuse to work - they also did rather well during that tax regime which held sway between 1945 and 1964. Those two decades were a period of unparalleled material wellbeing in the history of the US. Think about it.
Is the argument that the well-being after World War 2 in the US was caused in part by a 90% marginal tax rate? That's what spurs economic well-being?
Well you'll have less inequality. Inequality being a drag on economic growth. I've had this discussion with you at least 2 or 3 times previously, so please don't ask me to dig out all the references to the studies concluding this.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
Seabass
Posts: 7339
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:32 pm
About me: Pluviophile
Location: Covidiocracy
Contact:

Re: The Thread of Democrats

Post by Seabass » Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:59 pm

Forty Two wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 1:13 pm
Seabass wrote:
Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:28 pm
Forty Two wrote:
Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:19 pm
Seabass wrote:
Fri Jan 04, 2019 10:49 pm
Forty Two wrote:
Fri Jan 04, 2019 10:38 pm
If Sinema, O'Rourke and She Guevara are the best the Democrats have to offer, they have some big problems. Complete idiots. It's like we have Caligula appointing his horse to the Senate.
Climate deniers who support presidents who think climate change is a Chinese hoax probably shouldn't call people idiots. Just sayin'...

Btw, Trump is Caligula. Combover Caligula is one of the names the internet has given him. It's probably unwise for Trump worshippers to bring up Caligula.
Try your best, Seabass. Keep lying and accusing me of being a "climate denier." Put your trust in Kyrsten Sinema, Beto O'Rourke and She Guevara - they know what they're doing. "The first thing we do, is raise all the taxes to 70%!" - Alexandria Ocathio-Corteth.
Well, I saw the 60 Minutes clip to which you are probably referring.

Either:
A. you don't know how marginal tax rates work,
B. you are being dishonest, or
C. you are, as is so often the case, mindlessly parroting far-right disinformation.

My guess would be C.
Dishonest about what? What disinformation? You haven't disputed anything I said.
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." —Voltaire
"They want to take away your hamburgers. This is what Stalin dreamt about but never achieved." —Sebastian Gorka

User avatar
Seabass
Posts: 7339
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:32 pm
About me: Pluviophile
Location: Covidiocracy
Contact:

Re: The Thread of Democrats

Post by Seabass » Tue Jan 08, 2019 12:01 am

Forty Two wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 1:26 pm
rainbow wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 1:18 pm
Forty Two wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 1:13 pm
I'm not a climate denier.
You deny that you deny climate change?

How concerned are you?
Yes, I deny that I deny climate change.

I'm sufficiently concerned.
Of course a climate denier would say that. If you were to one day wake up and come to the realization that you had been insufficiently concerned about climate change, then you would no longer be a climate denier, would you...
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." —Voltaire
"They want to take away your hamburgers. This is what Stalin dreamt about but never achieved." —Sebastian Gorka

User avatar
Cunt
Lumpy Vagina Bloodfart
Posts: 19069
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:10 am
Contact:

Re: The Thread of Democrats

Post by Cunt » Tue Jan 08, 2019 12:33 am

Seabass wrote:
Tue Jan 08, 2019 12:01 am
Forty Two wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 1:26 pm
rainbow wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 1:18 pm
Forty Two wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 1:13 pm
I'm not a climate denier.
You deny that you deny climate change?

How concerned are you?
Yes, I deny that I deny climate change.

I'm sufficiently concerned.
Of course a climate denier would say that. If you were to one day wake up and come to the realization that you had been insufficiently concerned about climate change, then you would no longer be a climate denier, would you...
How concerned are you? How much does that differ from the amount others are concerned?

Is there a measure you can use? Or is your righteous indignation enough to scowl at the unconcern of others?
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists


Joe wrote:
Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:22 pm
he doesn't communicate
Free speech anywhere, is a threat to tyrants everywhere.

User avatar
L'Emmerdeur
Posts: 6203
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:04 pm
About me: Yuh wust nightmaya!
Contact:

Re: The Thread of Democrats

Post by L'Emmerdeur » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:38 am

Creeps love a lightning rod, and their bilious cheap shots at the flavor of the month bring us this surreal story.

'A Fake Nude of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Was Debunked By Foot Fetishists'
An image that’s being passed off as a nude of congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was debunked as being fake by a foot fetishist on Reddit—because that’s the future we’re living in now.

On Sunday, someone posted a photo of a woman’s legs and feet in a bathtub on one of Reddit’s most popular forums, r/Drama. The post is titled “MOMMY'S TITTIES ON THE FAUCET,” with a photo of feet in a tub from the photographer’s point of view, holding a vape pen. Overlaid on the photo is the text “alexandria ocasio-cortez.instagram.post.9-3-2016.”

The image and text aren’t new—they’ve been around in this combination since at least last month, posted to Twitter and 4chan’s /pol/ political forums, as well as a handful of other subreddits and forums, including some dedicated to revenge porn and creepshots. The conceit here is that if you zoom in to the faucet reflection, you can see the photographer’s breasts, and if you’re to believe the text on the image, that’s Ocasio-Cortez.

...

“I'm a contributor to wikifeet and even I have never seen a second toe like that!” Reddit user jokes_on_you commented on the post. They then linked to a known photo of Ocasio-Cortez’s feet and implied that the feet in the r/drama post couldn’t possibly belong to her.

I asked jokes_on_you how they spotted the difference. "I’ve sucked enough toes in my life to recognize when something doesn’t look right," they told me in a Reddit direct message. "Because we can’t dorsi- or plantarflex our 2nd-5th toes independently I knew it wasn’t a matter of the toe being bent. I thought that maybe she has some form of brachydactyly but her Wikifeet page has clear evidence to the contrary. So it was clear to me that it wasn’t her feet."

The photo, as well as the feet, actually belong to Sydney Leathers, a political activist and cam model who you might recall from Anthony Weiner’s sexting investigation in 2016. Leathers confirmed in a Twitter direct message that the original photograph does, in fact, belong to her and features her feet. “That pic is a few years old and now reaffirms my current stance of no longer posting feet pics unless dudes pay me for it,” Leathers told me.
:fp: :funny:

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests