Occupy Movement Links To Communism?

[Feck]

I bet they are all atheists ,that's the same as pinko commie fag subversives . I bet they all dress up in women's clothing at home ..erm oops sorry got confused there ....

[sandinista]

I answered the question.

No...actually you haven't. You said Che deserved to be killed because he "murdered" people, I asked if US soldiers deserve to be killed for "murdering" people. You never answered.

Fuck you. You lie and most people know it.

They finally got so frustrated at my debunking of communism and socialism

haha, so delusional. You never dubunked anything...ever. You were banned for personal attacks and telling people things like "fuck you". Same things you do here.

[sandinista]

On the subject of how utterly evil Communism and Socialism are? Months...no, years.

You do realize you're wasting your time, as I've seen no one on any board...ever...I mean ever, agree with you. In fact, the more you rail against communism and/or socialism the more it makes both seem like a good idea.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

I wonder how long Seth can go, he's like an Energizer bunny!

On the subject of how utterly evil Communism and Socialism are? Months...no, years. Just ask the folks at RatSkep. They finally got so frustrated at my debunking of communism and socialism that they were forced to violate their own FUA and ethical principles to ban me because I annoyed the socialists so badly and the Mods got sick and tired of having to listen to them whine and bitch about me through the back-channel.

Pussies.

So why don't you just keep going and going and going.

[vjohn82]

The only salient question is whether Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot mudered their fellow human beings because their society had grown too reasonable and rational and, more obviously, were a means of enforcing the position of Atheism.

No country ever bombed another because it had reached the pinnacle of its intellectual and secular development.

That's why comparing religious vs. non-religious murderous states is pointless; they are not the same.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

The only salient question is whether Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot mudered their fellow human beings because their society had grown too reasonable and rational and, more obviously, were a means of enforcing the position of Atheism.

No country ever bombed another because it had reached the pinnacle of its intellectual and secular development.

That's why comparing religious vs. non-religious murderous states is pointless; they are not the same.

Intelligent religious people don't use that argument any more. Just sayin'.

[Seth]

I answered the question.

No...actually you haven't. You said Che deserved to be killed because he "murdered" people, I asked if US soldiers deserve to be killed for "murdering" people. You never answered.

Fuck you. You lie and most people know it.

They finally got so frustrated at my debunking of communism and socialism

haha, so delusional. You never dubunked anything...ever. You were banned for personal attacks and telling people things like "fuck you". Same things you do here.

Liar.

[Seth]

On the subject of how utterly evil Communism and Socialism are? Months...no, years.

You do realize you're wasting your time, as I've seen no one on any board...ever...I mean ever, agree with you.

What makes you think I'm interested in them doing so. In fact, many of them are just useful idiots who demonstrate the unintellectual and stupid nature of the socialist proletariat who are too stupid to even feed themselves, so the government has to do it for them.

In fact, the more you rail against communism and/or socialism the more it makes both seem like a good idea.

To drooling pinheaded proletarian socialist drones and Marxist dupes I'm sure it does. To the actual intelligent people of the world, the obverse is true. That's the way it is with Marxism and Socialism, when the ugly truths that Marxists and Socialists make every effort to deny and cover up come to light...like fundamental economic theory that proves that neither is a viable economic system...intelligent people reject both. That's why Marxism is largely rejected by civilized society and why Socialism is on the ropes, because it's eaten itself and its children and now there's nothing left to steal from others, so the whole charade is collapsing, beginning with Greece.

Bye bye.

[Seth]

The only salient question is whether Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot mudered their fellow human beings because their society had grown too reasonable and rational and, more obviously, were a means of enforcing the position of Atheism.

The answer to the last is absolutely yes. Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot were all hard-line Communists who not only rejected religion, but saw religion as "the opiate of the masses," a serious danger to the central power and control of the Marxist elite, and strove mightily to extirpate religion entirely because they were Atheists.

Interestingly, one of the first things to reemerge in the Soviet Union after its self-destruction was religion, even before capitalism.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

The only salient question is whether Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot mudered their fellow human beings because their society had grown too reasonable and rational and, more obviously, were a means of enforcing the position of Atheism.

The answer to the last is absolutely yes. Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot were all hard-line Communists who not only rejected religion, but saw religion as "the opiate of the masses," a serious danger to the central power and control of the Marxist elite, and strove mightily to extirpate religion entirely because they were Atheists.

[Schneibster]

Is Seth doing the "commies are teh evul bekuz they are teh athiest" bit again?

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Is Seth doing the "commies are teh evul bekuz they are teh athiest" bit again?

He couldn't eat that shoe so he threw it.

[vjohn82]

The only salient question is whether Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot mudered their fellow human beings because their society had grown too reasonable and rational and, more obviously, were a means of enforcing the position of Atheism.

The answer to the last is absolutely yes. Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot were all hard-line Communists who not only rejected religion, but saw religion as "the opiate of the masses," a serious danger to the central power and control of the Marxist elite, and strove mightily to extirpate religion entirely because they were Atheists.

Interestingly, one of the first things to reemerge in the Soviet Union after its self-destruction was religion, even before capitalism.

Fucking hell... that's as bad as the counter-argument gets, isn't it folks?

[Seth]

Is Seth doing the "commies are teh evul bekuz they are teh athiest" bit again?

"Again?" Sorry, not something I've ever said. I'm merely pointing out that Communists, who are evil, are also Atheists, and that their atheism is a direct cause of the deaths of 100 million people at their hands.

[Seth]

The only salient question is whether Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot mudered their fellow human beings because their society had grown too reasonable and rational and, more obviously, were a means of enforcing the position of Atheism.

The answer to the last is absolutely yes. Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot were all hard-line Communists who not only rejected religion, but saw religion as "the opiate of the masses," a serious danger to the central power and control of the Marxist elite, and strove mightily to extirpate religion entirely because they were Atheists.

I'm...appalled...that you find the horrific deaths of 100 million people perpetrated by Marxists to be so amusing. Says a lot about your character. It also demonstrates just how fucking evil Communism (and it's precursor Socialism) really is, and how those who believe it either system are clearly flatly insane and delusional and are clear and present dangers to all of humanity and need to be contained and made harmless, in the interests of liberty and justice.