All Things Trump: Is it over yet?

[pErvinalia]

"Left winger"

[Tero]

Rudy's "work"
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UdpiYZnEyZg

[Cunt]

You don't think so?

Here is why I think this is so important...

I know the Dems have some...lets say...friendly 'news' agencies. There are lots of stories from 'unnamed government sources' and we can call those 'Dem-leaks'.

If this stuff is true, it is the equivalent but 'Rep-leaks'.

Now, these kinds of leaks (from either side) aren't necessarily true, but they can be used to manipulate public opinion.

So ignoring the messages from either party would be a bit risky. If true, the evidence they are collecting will support some of the wilder claims they are making. Not prove it, but what they are doing is creating a narrative, which is meant to fit in with unrolling facts. Think about what they have been 'painting' with...
Epstein (connections with prominent Dems, Royals, Disney/ABC etc.)
Durham and the VERY high number of sealed indictments currently waiting to pop
Corrupt familial connections between Ukraine and Biden/Pelosi/Romney/1 or 2 others
DNC corruption/FISA/FISC
Comey/Corney/Clapper

There is more, but what kinds of bullshit stories do you think they could build around these real stories?

If the q stuff is coming from where I think it is, does it interest you as 'oppo activity'? Or do you prefer to get everything from your own party sources?

If q is all bullshit, it will still be interesting to learn how it was so carefully coordinated with Trumptweets.

If any of it is true though, the Democratic party is about to be gutted. That can't be good. I would like to see a Dem who can challenge or beat Trump.

I already said I liked Bernie best, would vote Yang. Amy whassername is probably best, but no-one would elect her. Bernie is very likeable, and sounds like he is mostly who he says he is. I don't like him for leader, but get why many would.

Warren is 1/1024th favourite.

[Brian Peacock]

I guess you're right, MISinformation and DISinformation are not irrelevant - if you know they're false or misleading, or if you want people to accept their falsehood for truth.

Trump may be all the bad children in Charlie and Chocolate Factory rolled into one, and the colour of an oompa loompa, but at the moment the biggest threat to his re-election is probably cholesterol.

[Cunt]

I guess you're right, MISinformation and DISinformation are not irrelevant - if you know they're false or misleading, or if you want people to accept their falsehood for truth.

Trump may be all the bad children in Charlie and Chocolate Factory rolled into one, and the colour of an oompa loompa, but at the moment the biggest threat to his re-election is probably cholesterol.

That's fucking bleak, Brian.

But I agree. The best of the Dems has no hope.

Bernie dead via Kyle Jurek
Warren 1/1024 dead
Biden dead via Hunter/James/Old age

The ones I think best haven't got a chance (Yang and Klobichar)

So have a look at the 'proofs' of coordination between q and Trump, and present a plausable theory for it NOT coming from 'inner circle', if you would, please and thanks.

I can't fully satisfy myself on that question, if you also find yourself in the same boat, maybe we can take a serious look.

How? I don't fucking know. That's why I leave the claims 'unanswered' mostly...it's quite frustrating to have such a simple-seeming question in the way.

[Tero]

The Democrat will carry WI, MI and PA. Trump loses.
We all breathe sigh of relief.

[Tero]

Trump budget summary
https://mobile.twitter.com/morethanmySL ... 5935102976

[Cunt]

So do you think the Warren video from Judicial Watch will do any damage to her?

(I really thought her out of the running anyway)

[Tero]

Warren is irrelevant now. And she won't match with anyone as VP.

[Cunt]

That's 1/1024th sad.

[L'Emmerdeur]

I understand these attacks on q, but the assertions aren't like that.

The assertions are exactly like that. Rampant loon-bait.

It's mostly asking leading questions, and they have often been interesting ones. Like the hints and leaks that have always coming from government.

Anyway, sticking on the first point (rather than how much of it is bullshit) if you contend that the insider is delusional, can you give a reason for Trump to tweet coordinated confirmations of q's authenticity?

You have yet to show anything like that happening. It could just as easily be QAnon believers picking up on unrelated spewage from Trump and making patterns that reinforce their confirmation bias. If that is happening the explanation is obvious: Because it suits Trump to encourage the gullible enthusiasts that support him. What is clearly happening though is that Trump is retweeting shit from QAnon believers because he'll retweet any damn thing that he thinks makes him look good or advances a narrative he likes. He cares not whether there is any factual basis for it.

Dismissing it as delusional is easy, but it dodges the question of where it is coming from.

As if it's inconceivable that a random shitposter would create a persona and proceed to dribble out arse gravy tailored for the consumption of swivel-eyed mouth breathers.

I think that one piece is very significant. The recent coverage by the NY Times sounded fair enough (to most), but random twitterers are already finding oddments.

the Times...
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1226641222925791233

In its intelligence bulletin identifying QAnon as a potential domestic terror threat, the FBI warned that social media was serving as an incubator for groundless theories and inspiring followers to take action.

That's one tweet from a thread. Read it here, or don't. If The New York Times is putting out disinformation, a reporter from another news outlet will get a nice scoop if he exposes them. Then again, in the QAnon mindset they're all in on the conspiracy, so if the 'lies' are not exposed, it's because of that. Win-win.

So yeah, you mean like the QAnon jackass carrying a couple of rifles that used a homemade 'armoured truck' to block a bridge next to the Hoover Dam, making demands based on QAnon rubbish? Or the other true believer who shot and killed somebody because he thought he was advancing the cause of QAnon? The thing is, people that obsess over conspiracy theories are among the most likely to suffer a break from reality and resort to violence. I think it's reasonable for the FBI to pay attention to what's going on with them.

https://twitter.com/prayingmedic/status ... 5163901955

I received a reply from the FBI on my FOIA request. They could not confirm the so-called "FBI intelligence bulletin" about conspiracies.

They also referred me to the bureau's public bulletin on categorization of terror threats which does not mention conspiracies as a threat.

So if the NYTimes was being honest, no need for you to worry, right?

What if they lied or were misled? Is that 'no worries'?

I'm not as confident dismissing it as 'not coordinated with Trump'. To me, since it seems to come from there, it is important, relevant information about the US political scene. Might be MISinformation, or DISinformation, but not irrelevant.

Its primary (perhaps only) relevance is the behaviour it elicits from the mugs who subscribe to it.

[Cunt]

Its primary (perhaps only) relevance is the behaviour it elicits from the mugs who subscribe to it.

If you keep being insulting, that might change my mind.

More likely would be demonstrating that you know how q verified it's identity after the 8kun reboot.

Are you familiar with the Epstein case?

If I gave you the brief rundown, would you think I was pitching a conspiracy theory about elite pedophiles with islands and sweetheart sentencing agreements?

I wouldn't blame you, but the truth about that is too weird to pitch as a conspiracy theory. Maybe when Randy Andy finally answers the FBI we'll understand more about it.

[Tero]

trump pals.jpg (50.89 KiB) Viewed 1537 times

[rainbow]

Are you familiar with the Epstein case?

If I gave you the brief rundown, would you think I was pitching a conspiracy theory about elite pedophiles with islands and sweetheart sentencing agreements?

I wouldn't blame you, but the truth about that is too weird to pitch as a conspiracy theory. Maybe when Randy Andy finally answers the FBI we'll understand more about it.

There isn't very much to understand.
Gone are the days when he would lock himsef in the study with a bottle of whisky and a revolver.

[Tero]

Trump invents new math: don't count Democrat votes at all:
https://www.politicususa.com/2020/02/10 ... h-him.html