Media Bias

[Cunt]

"drunken, slurring"... Don't you realise that video was doctored?

I've seen the doctored video. I've also seen a LOT of video of her.

If she is NOT a drunken idiot, she will get right on that impeachment everyone wants. If she just shouts ineffectually, like a drunken lout, I guess that will be her crowning achievement.

It's hilarious how firmly many will defend lifelong parasites as long as they are on the political 'same side'.

I'm not defending anyone, let alone anyone on my side (she's a right winger). I'm pointing out your gullibility.

But I already knew about the fake video kerfuffle.

It didn't make me think she was an addlepated jackass, it was her actions in response to Trumps activities which convinced me of that.

[Brian Peacock]

You knew the video was faked but you wen't with "drunken slurring" anyway? I guess the video did it's job then - validating THE OUTRAGE!! so many have been primed to regurgitate on cue.

[Cunt]

You knew the video was faked but you wen't with "drunken slurring" anyway? I guess the video did it's job then - validating THE OUTRAGE!! so many have been primed to regurgitate on cue.

Plenty of other videos where she sounds drunk or drugged, but you see what you want to see, I guess.

[Brian Peacock]

But whose story are you retelling there? Do you remember when Hilary had Alzheimer's?

[Hermit]

But whose story are you retelling there? Do you remember when Hilary had Alzheimer's?

Dunno about those, but I remember all those reports about a Kenyan born President, a purveyor of pizzas whose main income was derived from child sex slavery and a former First Lady and Secretary of State who arranged 149 murders. What a horrific lot, those democrats!

[Seabass]

Laura Ingraham tells her viewers not to believe what they just heard Donald Trump say.

[Seabass]

"Lock her up" and Sean Hannity's "beyond despicable" hypocrisy

[Cunt]

But whose story are you retelling there? Do you remember when Hilary had Alzheimer's?

I was thinking of when she recently talked about D-Day, and how she came off as an incoherent idiot.

But then again, I never really thought much of her and her gang, so I wasn't that surprised.

What really surprised me, was that 'news' agencies doxxed the guy who made the 'drunk Pelosi' video, as if it's good to dox people for making funny videos.

[L'Emmerdeur]

In which we're informed that somebody monetizing their political 'news' pages under the names 'Politics WatchDog' and 'AllNews 24/7,' and whose ownership of those pages is public information should be sheltered by other 'news' sites from having that public information more widely known. Personal definition of 'doxxing' FTW!

[Brian Peacock]

Aye, if the 'drunk' video had been presented as satire rather than fact then perhaps Cunt would have had a point for once.

[Cunt]

Aye, if the 'drunk' video had been presented as satire rather than fact then perhaps Cunt would have had a point for once.

It's very selective how these rules are applied. It's almost like twitter, youtube facebook et al are operating politically, supporting one party or 'side' over another, and using their (seized by fiat) metadata about voters habits to get shit done.

But yeah, focus carefully on the new guy. That career politician with the incoherent speech and the desperate spouting of the 'impeachment' repetitive chant (not followed by action) should be defended because...um...oh yeah.
She's a lady.
She's a democrat.
She's got lots of money.

None of that earns any of MY respect, but I can see why it might gather white knights.

By the way, where is Ruth G? It's like the media forgot about her...

[L'Emmerdeur]

Aye, if the 'drunk' video had been presented as satire rather than fact then perhaps Cunt would have had a point for once.

Making a genuine point is largely irrelevant I think.

[Joe]

Aye, if the 'drunk' video had been presented as satire rather than fact then perhaps Cunt would have had a point for once.

It's very selective how these rules are applied. It's almost like twitter, youtube facebook et al are operating politically, supporting one party or 'side' over another, and using their (seized by fiat) metadata about voters habits to get shit done.

But yeah, focus carefully on the new guy. That career politician with the incoherent speech and the desperate spouting of the 'impeachment' repetitive chant (not followed by action) should be defended because...um...oh yeah.
She's a lady.
She's a democrat.
She's got lots of money.

None of that earns any of MY respect, but I can see why it might gather white knights.

By the way, where is Ruth G? It's like the media forgot about her...

She's gone missing. I haven't heard anything about her since she gave that speech to the Second Circuit Judicial Conference on Friday.

[Cunt]

So CNN is your 'source' of information?

Fucking hilarious! You tease me for using Breitbart and the Tim Pool and you use these guys? lol

[Joe]

So CNN is your 'source' of information?

Fucking hilarious! You tease me for using Breitbart and the Tim Pool and you use these guys? lol

Oh, that was just to tweak you. It's on Breitbart too.