An independent Scotland?

Post Reply
User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by mistermack » Thu Oct 25, 2012 1:02 pm

Tyrannical wrote:So, who gets to be King of Scotland? Who would be Mary's closest Scottish relative? I bet the Pope could crown him while sitting above the coronation stone.
I'm available.
As a direct descendant of Kenneth McAlpin, I'm definitely first in line.
I'm also happy to learn polo, and criticise new buildings.

My geraniums have democratically elected me, and they told me it's my destiny.

I always said Scotland should be free.
Apparently, it's not free, but it is a bargain.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Rum » Thu Oct 25, 2012 1:14 pm

Free Scotland! (with every six packets of porridge oats!)

User avatar
Red Celt
Humanist Misanthrope
Posts: 1349
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 8:30 pm
About me: Crow Philosopher
Location: Fife, Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Red Celt » Thu Oct 25, 2012 1:17 pm

(c) Stereotypes R Us
Image

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23746
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Thu Oct 25, 2012 1:49 pm

Hmmm. Spain not happy with automatic EU membership for Scotland. THe issue is not as clear cut as the Little Scotlanders like to pretend. Salmonella would know this, if he had sought legal advice...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012 ... ship-spain
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23746
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Thu Oct 25, 2012 1:54 pm

Interesting. The separatists like to honk that they are standing on firm ground but it just ain't true.

http://shiftinggrounds.org/2012/10/what ... nd-the-eu/
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41185
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Svartalf » Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:01 pm

Red Celt wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:So, who gets to be King of Scotland? Who would be Mary's closest Scottish relative? I bet the Pope could crown him while sitting above the coronation stone.
Scotland already has a monarch... and her mother was a Scot.
YOu wouldn't secede from UK and keep that harridan, latest of a long line of Hunnish usurpers for a head of state, would you?
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23746
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:02 pm

It would be amusing if HMQ said she didn't want the job.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

ronmcd
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:13 pm
Location: Sunny Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by ronmcd » Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:07 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:Interesting. The separatists like to honk that they are standing on firm ground but it just ain't true.

http://shiftinggrounds.org/2012/10/what ... nd-the-eu/
Two lines of particular interest in that article you linked to:
What emerges from this is that the real determining factors are political rather than legal.
....
I personally have no doubt that Scotland would be allowed to join the EU.

ronmcd
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:13 pm
Location: Sunny Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by ronmcd » Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:11 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:It would be amusing if HMQ said she didn't want the job.
You do realise the Queen is NOT "Queen of England" with all the other commonwealth countries just having her as monarch out of the goodness of her heart?
James VI and I (19 June 1566 – 27 March 1625) was King of Scotland as James VI from 24 July 1567 and King of England and Ireland as James I from the union of the English and Scottish crowns on 24 March 1603 until his death. The kingdoms of England and Scotland were individual sovereign states, with their own parliaments, judiciary, and laws, though both were ruled by James in personal union.
No need to thank us for lending you our monarchy ... :tup:

User avatar
Red Celt
Humanist Misanthrope
Posts: 1349
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 8:30 pm
About me: Crow Philosopher
Location: Fife, Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Red Celt » Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:12 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:Hmmm. Spain not happy with automatic EU membership for Scotland. THe issue is not as clear cut as the Little Scotlanders like to pretend. Salmonella would know this, if he had sought legal advice...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012 ... ship-spain
And what about The Republic of Ireland, CH? (CH = Cunting Hypocrite)
Image

User avatar
Red Celt
Humanist Misanthrope
Posts: 1349
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 8:30 pm
About me: Crow Philosopher
Location: Fife, Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Red Celt » Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:14 pm

Svartalf wrote:
Red Celt wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:So, who gets to be King of Scotland? Who would be Mary's closest Scottish relative? I bet the Pope could crown him while sitting above the coronation stone.
Scotland already has a monarch... and her mother was a Scot.
YOu wouldn't secede from UK and keep that harridan, latest of a long line of Hunnish usurpers for a head of state, would you?
It doesn't really matter what anyone thinks about that. The monarchy is not a part of the independence debate.
Image

User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by klr » Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:18 pm

ronmcd wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:Interesting. The separatists like to honk that they are standing on firm ground but it just ain't true.

http://shiftinggrounds.org/2012/10/what ... nd-the-eu/
Two lines of particular interest in that article you linked to:
What emerges from this is that the real determining factors are political rather than legal.
....
I personally have no doubt that Scotland would be allowed to join the EU.
I'm sorry, but I've just read the full article, and that's quote-mining. Quoting out of context if you will. The gist of the article is this: It's a political matter, but Scotland is not going to be in a very good position at all. That's hardly a revelation BTW.
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Tyrannical » Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:37 pm

You know, the BNP supports a win-win situation for this discussion :zilla:
Give the English an English Parliament, and drastically curtail the UK's parliamentary powers.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

ronmcd
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:13 pm
Location: Sunny Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by ronmcd » Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:46 pm

klr wrote:
ronmcd wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:Interesting. The separatists like to honk that they are standing on firm ground but it just ain't true.

http://shiftinggrounds.org/2012/10/what ... nd-the-eu/
Two lines of particular interest in that article you linked to:
What emerges from this is that the real determining factors are political rather than legal.
....
I personally have no doubt that Scotland would be allowed to join the EU.
I'm sorry, but I've just read the full article, and that's quote-mining. Quoting out of context if you will. The gist of the article is this: It's a political matter, but Scotland is not going to be in a very good position at all. That's hardly a revelation BTW.
No, Clinton seems to think Scotland would not be allowed to join the EU. The article says what others have said: it's not credible to think the EU would not accept Scotland. We WILL be in EU, undoubtedly after negotiations and political discussions.

It would be quote mining if I were trying to change the meaning of the author's words. I wasn't, as I wasn't commenting on the main thrust of his opinion, ie what Scotland would have to do or go through to be accepted. Just pointing out the parts I quoted - that the author like me thinks Scotland would absolutely be in EU.

Incidentally, I disagree with the article. It asserts that UK would be the successor state, with Scotland being a new state. There are many legal opinions which say that is not so, because we are not talking about the UK being a single state with a small chunk becoming a new country for the first time. We are talking about the breaking of a union between two countries, Scotland and England ie GB, rendering the UK potentially non-existent.

ronmcd
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:13 pm
Location: Sunny Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by ronmcd » Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:47 pm

Tyrannical wrote:You know, the BNP supports a win-win situation for this discussion :zilla:
Give the English an English Parliament, and drastically curtail the UK's parliamentary powers.
Why would an English Parliament be a win for the BNP, compared to a UK Parliament?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 28 guests