I couldn't be arsed chasing links down, but here's my understanding of a couple of the most recent points: The attack in May was confirmed (or as close to that as you'll get) as being done by the opposition. I thought the UN had made that confirmation. Perhaps it was someone else. Relating to the current inspection, I heard on our ABC (so usually pretty reliable) last night that the inspections aren't tasked with assigning blame, but only confirming if chemical weapons were used. If they find in the affirmative, it will say nothing about who used them (although, they might report off-record who is likely to be the culprit, you'd imagine).
An article today about the opposition:
If Barack Obama decides to attack the Syrian regime, he has ensured – for the very first time in history – that the United States will be on the same side as al-Qa’ida.
Quite an alliance! Was it not the Three Musketeers who shouted “All for one and one for all” each time they sought combat? This really should be the new battle cry if – or when – the statesmen of the Western world go to war against Bashar al-Assad.
The men who destroyed so many thousands on 9/11 will then be fighting alongside the very nation whose innocents they so cruelly murdered almost exactly 12 years ago. Quite an achievement for Obama, Cameron, Hollande and the rest of the miniature warlords.
This, of course, will not be trumpeted by the Pentagon or the White House – nor, I suppose, by al-Qa’ida – though they are both trying to destroy Bashar. So are the Nusra front, one of al-Qa’ida’s affiliates. But it does raise some interesting possibilities.
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/com ... 86680.htmlSent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
