Guns Used.....cont

Locked
User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Guns Used.....cont

Post by Blind groper » Sun Nov 25, 2012 12:06 am

Seth

I said home invasions are rare. They happen, just as meteorites fall from the sky from time to time. They get lots of publicity when they happen because they are rare. This means you can find anecdotes if you want to, and of course they happened. But they are still rare.

There is a difference between a home invasion and a burglary, even if the burglar enters an occupied home. The burglar will do his best to avoid that error, but of course it happens from time to time. The difference is that a home invasion involves people being held, while a burglary that happens in error when people are at home will involve the burglar avoiding contact with the residents. A burglar is simply after your property and does not want to even see you. A home invader will deliberately threaten the occupants. A totally different event.

Nor do hand guns alter that. We have no hand guns in NZ, and home invasions are very rare here. The fact that they are rare in the USA is for the same reason. The criminals involved prefer to avoid serious trouble, and the police take home invasions very seriously. In my country, pretty much every home invasion crime is solved, and the criminals involved locked up for a long period. They are caught because the police put in a big effort. Burglaries are common, but burglars will avoid people. Police do not try very hard to solve burglaries, and relatively few burglars are ever caught by the police, making burglary a much more attractive option than home invasion for criminals.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Guns Used.....cont

Post by Robert_S » Sun Nov 25, 2012 12:17 am

http://www.digitalspy.com/odd/news/a440 ... opper.html
A queue of Black Friday shoppers scattered after a man in the line pulled out his gun.

The Sears store at South Park Mall in San Antonio, Texas opened at 8pm yesterday (November 22) when one shopper tried to push his way to the front.

According to San Antonio Express-News, he began arguing with people and soon punched someone in the face.

The man who was punched, in retaliation, drew his gun.

The crowd quickly dispersed, and the line-cutter fled the shop. Normal business resumed after ten minutes.

According to police, the man with the gun carries a licence for the weapon and thus will not be charged.

Read more: http://www.digitalspy.com/odd/news/a440 ... z2DBmJUsKC
Follow us: @digitalspy on Twitter | digitalspyuk on Facebook
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Guns Used.....cont

Post by Jason » Sun Nov 25, 2012 1:22 am

That man should have his all his firearms confiscated for a period of no less than 90 days, and receive a temporary restriction in being in possession of any firearm until he completes an intensive 4 week state regulated education course and/or pays a hefty fine.. say $2500.

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Guns Used.....cont

Post by FBM » Sun Nov 25, 2012 1:24 am

Why? Some shithead cut in line! Blast him!!

Oh. And punched him. If someone physically assaulted me, I wouldn't want to be afraid to defend myself with a gun. No telling how big that guy was. :dunno:
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Guns Used.....cont

Post by Jason » Sun Nov 25, 2012 1:28 am

Dude punched someone else in the face, not the guy with the gun. Besides, what's in a punch? I've known people to call a closed palm slap a punch. From the description all some hero had to do was step in and say chill out bud and get back to the end of the line, not recklessly brandish a gun in a crowd. What if he accidentally fired? What if he intentionally fired? How many innocents would have been injured. Morons like that need to be educated on when and where it's appropriate to haul iron.

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51696
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 8-34-20
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Guns Used.....cont

Post by Tero » Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:12 am

Sorry guys, we just can't have the guns. When we put plan B into effect, you are just going to be trouble. So we will need to isolate and contain all of you. Ammunition will be a strictly controlled item then.

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Guns Used.....cont

Post by Robert_S » Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:23 am

PordFrefect wrote:Dude punched someone else in the face, not the guy with the gun. Besides, what's in a punch? I've known people to call a closed palm slap a punch. From the description all some hero had to do was step in and say chill out bud and get back to the end of the line, not recklessly brandish a gun in a crowd. What if he accidentally fired? What if he intentionally fired? How many innocents would have been injured. Morons like that need to be educated on when and where it's appropriate to haul iron.
I'd rather take a risk like that and have one less rude fuck in the world. I'm not a gun nut though, I just hate rude bullying pushy fucks who cut in line and push people around. As far as I'm concerned, a large knife, jack handle, tire iron, or other garden tool would suffice.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Guns Used.....cont

Post by Gallstones » Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:59 am

This will crack a skull, or an arm.

Image
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Guns Used.....cont

Post by Blind groper » Sun Nov 25, 2012 4:01 am

A can of pepper spray would have taken care of the punch happy asshole, and no one permanently hurt. He would then think twice before he tried that act again.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Guns Used.....cont

Post by Gallstones » Sun Nov 25, 2012 4:04 am

Blind groper wrote:A can of pepper spray would have taken care of the punch happy asshole, and no one permanently hurt. He would then think twice before he tried that act again.
And everyone in the vicinity would have gotten exposed to the spray, including children, asthmatics or anyone with COPD.

Pepper spray isn't the be-all-end-all of self defense tools.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Guns Used.....cont

Post by Blind groper » Sun Nov 25, 2012 4:24 am

Gallstones.

You suggest a lethal club. I suggest a non lethal pepper spray, and you tell me that it is too harmful?????????????????????????????
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Guns Used.....cont

Post by Gallstones » Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:11 am

Uhm, yeah.
A "lethal" club can be targeted to the deserving party.
Pepper spray can not and will have collateral affect in a group. Collateral parties don't deserve to be affected by the spray, they've already been exposed to the asshole.

Have you ever been exposed to pepper spray--it makes for a miserable time that doesn't wear off very fast.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Guns Used.....cont

Post by Blind groper » Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:15 am

I accept the point, but collateral effects should be minimal unless the sprayer is very careless.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Guns Used.....cont

Post by Robert_S » Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:24 am

Gallstones wrote:
Blind groper wrote:A can of pepper spray would have taken care of the punch happy asshole, and no one permanently hurt. He would then think twice before he tried that act again.
And everyone in the vicinity would have gotten exposed to the spray, including children, asthmatics or anyone with COPD.

Pepper spray isn't the be-all-end-all of self defense tools.
Not if you shove it up his nose! :irate:
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Guns Used.....cont

Post by FBM » Sun Nov 25, 2012 6:00 am

PordFrefect wrote:Dude punched someone else in the face, not the guy with the gun. Besides, what's in a punch? I've known people to call a closed palm slap a punch. From the description all some hero had to do was step in and say chill out bud and get back to the end of the line, not recklessly brandish a gun in a crowd. What if he accidentally fired? What if he intentionally fired? How many innocents would have been injured. Morons like that need to be educated on when and where it's appropriate to haul iron.
Robert_S wrote:http://www.digitalspy.com/odd/news/a440 ... opper.html
...The man who was punched, in retaliation, drew his gun.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests