Come on, Tyrannical, be fair. How many corpses have you dug up from the graveyard who were in shape to walk down to the DMV and apply for an ID?Tyrannical wrote:Who exactly does not have ID?
Having a form of identification to vote.
- Warren Dew
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
- Location: Somerville, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Having a form of identification to vote.
- mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
- Contact:
Re: Having a form of identification to vote.
Of course not, that's rubbish.Audley Strange wrote: I would vote against any attempt to make it mandatory to vote, it is dictatorial. People have a right to choose not to choose that is part and parcel of liberty. Vote or be punished, you like to see that? just add "for me" in after that vote, you're on the path already.
Just because you make it compulsory to vote, that doesn't mean you have to choose.
You just have a box titled "none of the above". At least you have fulfilled the obligation.
If you don't vote, you lose a one-off part of your benefit.
And voter ID could be handed out at the benefits office. They check your ID, or should do.
Why can't they issue a voter ID card? If they are issueing money, then it should be safe enough to issue voter ID.
Anyway, who knows, "none of the above" might actually get in.
Mit Romney might change his name to "none of the above", he would stand more chance that way.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
- Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: Having a form of identification to vote.
Voting is a privilege, and not a right. Therefor I'm against mandatory voting.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
- Audley Strange
- "I blame the victim"
- Posts: 7485
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
- Contact:
Re: Having a form of identification to vote.
Two things. First of all making anything compulsory takes away the choice not to involve yourself. You are creating a law which forces people to take part in a politically motivated spectacle. It's not rubbish to say that is dictatorial, it is dictatorial by definition. You are being dictated to, legally forced to do what you've told when there is no reason for it at all. Your parochial attitude says people should be punished for not doing what you think they should do. You are creating a crime for no other reason that a political motivation.mistermack wrote:Of course not, that's rubbish.Audley Strange wrote: I would vote against any attempt to make it mandatory to vote, it is dictatorial. People have a right to choose not to choose that is part and parcel of liberty. Vote or be punished, you like to see that? just add "for me" in after that vote, you're on the path already.
Just because you make it compulsory to vote, that doesn't mean you have to choose.
You just have a box titled "none of the above". At least you have fulfilled the obligation.
If you don't vote, you lose a one-off part of your benefit.
And voter ID could be handed out at the benefits office. They check your ID, or should do.
Why can't they issue a voter ID card? If they are issueing money, then it should be safe enough to issue voter ID.
Anyway, who knows, "none of the above" might actually get in.
Mit Romney might change his name to "none of the above", he would stand more chance that way.
Secondly this "none of the above" bullshit is just a glib toss away line that sounds good to those who don't think. It is an insane idea because without radical changes to the system of governance to support such a change, (and such radical changes would be an admission to a broken system. So why not attempt to fix it, if you are making an effort anyway, why not address the problems rather than just admit you recognise it with a stupid and dangerous "none of the above" option?) it would lead to a temporary cessation of the democratic process. If a majority vote "none of the above" then the current administration even if just in power to oversee the next election would have no mandate to do so. No one would, so what police state? Military Junta? Just go, "fuck it game over" and see what happens?
Any other crazy ideas?
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man
Re: Having a form of identification to vote.
Voting should be compulsory (with none of the above as an option) as its a good anti-libertarian symbol. It reminds people that while they live in society they are part of something bigger themselves whether they like it or not. Reminds people that not everything in life is about personal choice
When only criminals carry guns the police know exactly who to shoot!
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41178
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Having a form of identification to vote.
Compulsory voting is a bad idea... it turns every would be abstentionist into a loose cannon; if we had compulsory voting, Le Pen would likely have been elected in 2002 so fed up was the electorate.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Clinton Huxley
- 19th century monkeybitch.
- Posts: 23746
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: Having a form of identification to vote.
I think the marijuana party candidate would be my MP right now if we had compulsory voting....Svartalf wrote:Compulsory voting is a bad idea... it turns every would be abstentionist into a loose cannon; if we had compulsory voting, Le Pen would likely have been elected in 2002 so fed up was the electorate.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"
AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!
http://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"
AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Having a form of identification to vote.
Is that a vote against Democracy?Svartalf wrote:Compulsory voting is a bad idea... it turns every would be abstentionist into a loose cannon; if we had compulsory voting, Le Pen would likely have been elected in 2002 so fed up was the electorate.
- Audley Strange
- "I blame the victim"
- Posts: 7485
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
- Contact:
Re: Having a form of identification to vote.
Yeah, in fact why not lock em up if you don't like their vote and why not stop people standing for elections if you don't like their opinions. In fact, fuck voting let's just enslave anyone who doesn't agree with us, that'll solve the problem.MrJonno wrote:Voting should be compulsory (with none of the above as an option) as its a good anti-libertarian symbol. It reminds people that while they live in society they are part of something bigger themselves whether they like it or not. Reminds people that not everything in life is about personal choice
THINK FFS.
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41178
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Having a form of identification to vote.
You know what, that's a powerful argument pro you're bringing up... Pot Party might be better for the country than any of the others.Clinton Huxley wrote:I think the marijuana party candidate would be my MP right now if we had compulsory voting....Svartalf wrote:Compulsory voting is a bad idea... it turns every would be abstentionist into a loose cannon; if we had compulsory voting, Le Pen would likely have been elected in 2002 so fed up was the electorate.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41178
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Having a form of identification to vote.
Against the established molitical classes. Nobody wants blue shirts and tricolore armbands to become a near uniform.Coito ergo sum wrote:Is that a vote against Democracy?Svartalf wrote:Compulsory voting is a bad idea... it turns every would be abstentionist into a loose cannon; if we had compulsory voting, Le Pen would likely have been elected in 2002 so fed up was the electorate.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 4:17 am
- Location: U.S.A
- Contact:
Having a form of identification to vote.
It really is impossible in your opinion for the state to trespass against and individual, isn't it? No compulsion is unjustifiable, so long as whoever happens to wield power at the moment dictates it, whether elected or a dictator. I don't understand and don't mean to derail, can you briefly tell me what you base your philosophy on so I can try to read something about it? Sincere question.MrJonno wrote:Voting should be compulsory (with none of the above as an option) as its a good anti-libertarian symbol. It reminds people that while they live in society they are part of something bigger themselves whether they like it or not. Reminds people that not everything in life is about personal choice
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Having a form of identification to vote.
Well, if you're suggesting they would win the election if they voted, obviously a lot of people want that...Svartalf wrote:Against the established molitical classes. Nobody wants blue shirts and tricolore armbands to become a near uniform.Coito ergo sum wrote:Is that a vote against Democracy?Svartalf wrote:Compulsory voting is a bad idea... it turns every would be abstentionist into a loose cannon; if we had compulsory voting, Le Pen would likely have been elected in 2002 so fed up was the electorate.
- Audley Strange
- "I blame the victim"
- Posts: 7485
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
- Contact:
Re: Having a form of identification to vote.
Sometimes voter apathy is a good thing.
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist
- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: Having a form of identification to vote.
I'm not apathetic about politics, quite the opposite. But usually I don't vote for anyone because there's nobody worth voting for. Voting against isn't much of an option either, because they're all so fucking similar. Occasionally I vote for a minor party that I might identify with in certain ways, but a couple of times I've just drawn spunky cocks all over my ballot paper.Audley Strange wrote:Sometimes voter apathy is a good thing.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.
When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests