Going public is one avenue for justice. I won't fault them for it.Schneibster wrote:Nor should there ever be. School discipline of a child should not appear in public in any context unless there is criminal activity involved, and then only if public safety information must be disseminated or there is a question of adult wrongdoing. That these people would violate that precept by disseminating pictures of their own child tells me everything I need to know.Gallstones wrote:Not enough information to tell definitively.
I am not convinced that the school was correct.
No. Was there an offense that warranted discipline? There isn't enough information there for me to be able to tell.Schneibster wrote:Would you recommend that school officials not discipline?Gallstones wrote:Based solely on what was presented in the OP, my judgment is no, it is not racist.
Expulsion seems a bit extreme given that all that happened was a comparison between one notable person and another was made.
What makes that comparison racist?
In the US, a person is not subject to persecution for holding bigoted views, or of expressing them as long as they aren't threats to do bodily harm or violate some Federal statute.
Minors get some protection from publicity of their alleged crimes.Schneibster wrote:Or that they disseminate the details in public to defend themselves?
If there is a lawsuit the school would get no automatic protection from details being made public.
Whether making the details known best serves the school or the child I can't say. But I am suspicious of those who make efforts to hide such details.