But the reviews will all be glowing.JimC wrote:Someone has been doing naughty things with fissionable isotopes...
There will be tears before bedtime, mark my words...

But the reviews will all be glowing.JimC wrote:Someone has been doing naughty things with fissionable isotopes...
There will be tears before bedtime, mark my words...
It does, however make it a sectarian state, which makes it democratically illegitimate.HomerJay wrote:Gawd wrote:And of course I am being racist.A racist is someone who is being racist , QED you is racist.Gawd wrote:I'm not racist
Israel isn't a racist State because it excludes some Palestinians.
It is a gerrymandered state, set up to ensure a Jewish Israeli majority.
You could say that makes it electorially corrupt, but it doesn't make it racist.
So you're reflecting gerrymandering by being racist.
Problem being, since we brought babies up, that the other side is complicit because they're providing the provocation. We can't tell the Israelis "no" and have it stick because the Palestinians keep shooting rockets at unarmed Israeli civilians, i.e. blowing up babies, the very definition of indiscriminate fire and therefore a war crime.JimC wrote:The trouble with Gawd's posts on Israel is that he goes so far over the top that most people simply dismiss him (fair enough) and his criticisms of Israeli actions, which may be throwing the baby out with the bath-water...
You bet. And it would be great if the Palestinians hadn't been assholes for all those years and we could beat up on the Israelis about their human rights violations and actually get a plurality of Israeli citizens to agree. But they did what they did, and they're doing what they're doing, and they won't stop, so there's no handle we can use to stop the Israelis either. And now they wanna come blow our shit up instead of admitting they did it to themselves; and sorry, man, but that shit's not OK and we're gonna send our army to deal with it. Which we did, followed by extensive whining.JimC wrote:Sometimes, Gawd posts straightforward examples of clear-cut human rights abuses by Israel against its own arab population, and the way that Judaic biases by their government are part of the issue. I have no time for Hamas and the rest of the terrorist crowd, but Israel does some pretty appalling things...
They're our allies, and as long as the Palestinians keep blowing shit up we haven't a leg to stand on trying to get them to stop shooting Palestinians. It really is as simple as that.JimC wrote:The almost automatic support they get from the US makes them like a spoiled child who is going to get supported by his big brother no matter how obnoxious he is being... (The US may be critical of Israel from time to time over the settlement program etc. but it would be fair to dismiss that as window dressing, given that it is only ever words...)
:facepalm:Crumple wrote:Back on topic more or less. Trace amounts of Iodine 131 have been detected drifting across Europe the past couple of weeks. The source hasn't yet been idenified but this material is used in nuclear weapons.![]()
Unfortunately, that is not connected to the sectarian nature of the state in question. Zionism as a concept was fully formed in the late 1800s, and was pretty much mapped out by the time of the Balfour Declaration.Gawdzilla wrote:Israel has a rather justifiable siege mentality to some extent, I think.
You can't discuss Iran without including Israel given the propensity of Israel to attack Iranians and carry out extra judicial murders. And especially given this suspicious event and Israel gearing up to attack Iran and beating the war drums again.klr wrote:Once again, Gawd manages to drag a thread off the rails and onto his favourite (nay only) hobby horse. Don't we have a sub-forum for that? Unless and until there's some prima facie evidence that Israel is somehow involved in this, then any wider discussion of the whys and wherefores of the Middle East is well off-topic IMHO.
tl:drGawdzilla wrote:
I'm not a fan of Israel, but to the extent they can slow down or stop Iran's nuclear weapons program, more power to them.Gawd wrote:You can't discuss Iran without including Israel given the propensity of Israel to attack Iranians and carry out extra judicial murders. And especially given this suspicious event and Israel gearing up to attack Iran and beating the war drums again.
Iran has the right to defend itself. To single it out when Israel and half the countries in the world already have nukes is anti-Semitic. /SnarkWarren Dew wrote:I'm not a fan of Israel, but to the extent they can slow down or stop Iran's nuclear weapons program, more power to them.Gawd wrote:You can't discuss Iran without including Israel given the propensity of Israel to attack Iranians and carry out extra judicial murders. And especially given this suspicious event and Israel gearing up to attack Iran and beating the war drums again.
It seems like the computer virus attack has been renewed, too:
http://www.jpost.com/IranianThreat/News ... ?id=245467
As long as they stay away from the negotiating table there's nothing to be done.JimC wrote:If the Israelis were purely responding to incidents of Palestinian terrorism, such as rocket lanches from Gaza, then fair enough; an armed response is perfectly reasonable. However, it is the treatment of ordinary civilian arabs, nominally citizens of their country, which is the appalling thing. The settlement programs gradually eat away at their small-holdings, and they have no redress...
It is slow and remorseless ethnic cleansing, with religious overtones. No amount of pointing out the evil deeds of Palestinian terrorist groups can change that.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 27 guests