World population

Post Reply
User avatar
Atheist-Lite
Formerly known as Crumple
Posts: 8745
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:35 pm
About me: You need a jetpack? Here, take mine. I don't need a jetpack this far away.
Location: In the Galactic Hub, Yes That One !!!
Contact:

Re: World population

Post by Atheist-Lite » Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:09 am

JimC wrote:
Crumple wrote:The birth rate is declining because human beings are moving from population growth towards a steep collapse in human population. This is the top of the rollar coaster folks - it won't go any higher but will go down, quite fast. Are you ready for your future? :smoke:
Crumple, thy name is schadenfreude...
I'm only pointing out you've train headlights not the other end of the tunnel up ahead. There are limits to social complexity, these can be pushed for a time(thinks IT revolution and the credit boom) but the rebound is over-simplification and this is what I believe will ultimately crash global population levels below the threshold for maintaining industrial civilization. Those with the best educated populations will be also areas that have the most population density & in the 'over-simplification phase will experience the greatest social chaos...amid the social chaos very little can be done. Famines will ultimately sweep the earth as the green revolution fades and climate change, resoruce depletion. collapse of social customs etc etc all feed on themselves, until all is done...very few will be left. :zig:
nxnxm,cm,m,fvmf,vndfnm,nm,f,dvm,v v vmfm,vvm,d,dd vv sm,mvd,fmf,fn ,v fvfm,

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74293
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: World population

Post by JimC » Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:11 am

Eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow is sorrow beyond belief...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Exi5tentialist
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 4:55 pm
Location: Coalville
Contact:

Re: World population

Post by Exi5tentialist » Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:57 am

Crumple wrote:I'm only pointing out you've train headlights not the other end of the tunnel up ahead. There are limits to social complexity, these can be pushed for a time(thinks IT revolution and the credit boom) but the rebound is over-simplification and this is what I believe will ultimately crash global population levels below the threshold for maintaining industrial civilization. Those with the best educated populations will be also areas that have the most population density & in the 'over-simplification phase will experience the greatest social chaos...amid the social chaos very little can be done. Famines will ultimately sweep the earth as the green revolution fades and climate change, resoruce depletion. collapse of social customs etc etc all feed on themselves, until all is done...very few will be left. :zig:
The only causes of this population decline you posit are resource depletion and limits to social complexity. They're relevant as factors in the future of humanity, but not convincing as causes of a population crash. Could you elaborate a bit? Your theory seems to need a bit of padding out. And I mean of the causes, not the effects of population decline.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: World population

Post by Hermit » Sat Oct 15, 2011 12:08 pm

Crumple wrote:The birth rate is declining because human beings are moving from population growth towards a steep collapse in human population.
Wow! The profundity is awesome.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: World population

Post by Hermit » Sat Oct 15, 2011 12:11 pm

surreptitious57 wrote:And also remember large areas of the planet relatively uninhabited such as Australia for example.
...and Antarctica. There are some pretty good reasons why both of them are so sparsely populated.

Just repeating what has already been said in case you are not inclined to catch up on all of the previous posts that have been made since your last one.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: World population

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:22 pm

PordFrefect wrote:I forget the stats now, but sub-Saharan Africa has the highest predicted population growth rate last I heard.
Great place for over-population. :coffee:
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23746
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: World population

Post by Clinton Huxley » Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:28 pm

There's plenty of space between Liverpool and Manchester that is just ruined, overgrown former factories and the like. We could squeeze a few million in there.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Atheist-Lite
Formerly known as Crumple
Posts: 8745
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:35 pm
About me: You need a jetpack? Here, take mine. I don't need a jetpack this far away.
Location: In the Galactic Hub, Yes That One !!!
Contact:

Re: World population

Post by Atheist-Lite » Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:29 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
PordFrefect wrote:I forget the stats now, but sub-Saharan Africa has the highest predicted population growth rate last I heard.
Great place for over-population. :coffee:
Like California with camels. :smoke:
nxnxm,cm,m,fvmf,vndfnm,nm,f,dvm,v v vmfm,vvm,d,dd vv sm,mvd,fmf,fn ,v fvfm,

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: World population

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:47 pm

Crumple wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
PordFrefect wrote:I forget the stats now, but sub-Saharan Africa has the highest predicted population growth rate last I heard.
Great place for over-population. :coffee:
Like California with camels. :smoke:
More like China.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Atheist-Lite
Formerly known as Crumple
Posts: 8745
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:35 pm
About me: You need a jetpack? Here, take mine. I don't need a jetpack this far away.
Location: In the Galactic Hub, Yes That One !!!
Contact:

Re: World population

Post by Atheist-Lite » Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:53 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
Crumple wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
PordFrefect wrote:I forget the stats now, but sub-Saharan Africa has the highest predicted population growth rate last I heard.
Great place for over-population. :coffee:
Like California with camels. :smoke:
More like China.
Outsourcing again.... :fp:
nxnxm,cm,m,fvmf,vndfnm,nm,f,dvm,v v vmfm,vvm,d,dd vv sm,mvd,fmf,fn ,v fvfm,

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: World population

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:54 pm

Crumple wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Crumple wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
PordFrefect wrote:I forget the stats now, but sub-Saharan Africa has the highest predicted population growth rate last I heard.
Great place for over-population. :coffee:
Like California with camels. :smoke:
More like China.
Outsourcing again.... :fp:
:funny:
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: World population

Post by mistermack » Sat Oct 15, 2011 6:21 pm

Exi5tentialist wrote: Education of women is a function of increase in wealth. Churches probably do wield a big influence, but not big enough to counter the increase in wealth. Please do not misquote me, I am not arguing that everybody in Brazil is suddenly rich. We are talking about relative trends, not absolutes.
I'm certainly not trying to put words in your mouth.

I was just pointing out that the article I read about Brazil made it clear that it seems to be a special case, and it's not just improved living conditions that are at work.
I agree it's normally directly related to poverty. But Brazil seems to have bucked that trend.

I've found it again, the link is below. It actually seems to be women taking a lead, and the influence of TV soap operas, that are changing opinions.
National Geographic on the drop in the Brazilian birth rate
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Exi5tentialist
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 4:55 pm
Location: Coalville
Contact:

Re: World population

Post by Exi5tentialist » Sat Oct 15, 2011 6:55 pm

mistermack wrote:
Exi5tentialist wrote: Education of women is a function of increase in wealth. Churches probably do wield a big influence, but not big enough to counter the increase in wealth. Please do not misquote me, I am not arguing that everybody in Brazil is suddenly rich. We are talking about relative trends, not absolutes.
I'm certainly not trying to put words in your mouth.

I was just pointing out that the article I read about Brazil made it clear that it seems to be a special case, and it's not just improved living conditions that are at work.
I agree it's normally directly related to poverty. But Brazil seems to have bucked that trend.

I've found it again, the link is below. It actually seems to be women taking a lead, and the influence of TV soap operas, that are changing opinions.
National Geographic on the drop in the Brazilian birth rate
There are lots of very inconclusive articles out there about Brazil's falling birth rate. However, the basic factor is obvious. Brazil has increased is per capita income over the last 20-30 years. All the women's movements in the world can't achieve anything on the basis of continuing, absolute poverty. Soap operas are a detail on top of the decrease in poverty. Brazil is not bucking any trends.

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: World population

Post by Warren Dew » Sun Oct 16, 2011 2:12 am

charlou wrote:
MarkS wrote:No idea if it's actually true, but i read somewhere the most effective way of reducing population growth was to make sure girls got a decent education.
I think so. I wouldn't underestimate the benefit of education for boys in this as well, though.
The primary effect of education in women appears to be a delay in marriage and childbirth. One province in China simply increased the minimum age for marriage - and didn't use the "one child" policy - and got the same effect. The women don't have to learn anything from their continued education for it to cut the birth rate.

Educating the men doesn't have the same effect, since male fertility doesn't drop as rapidly with age.
That and the availability of effective means of fertility control (for both sexes), 'morning after' remedies and abortion, all of which should be readily available to anyone.
Some effective means of birth control needs to be available - and it probably needs to be under the control of women and not men. Mistermack's article suggests that even just one means of birth control may be sufficient, though.

User avatar
Atheist-Lite
Formerly known as Crumple
Posts: 8745
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:35 pm
About me: You need a jetpack? Here, take mine. I don't need a jetpack this far away.
Location: In the Galactic Hub, Yes That One !!!
Contact:

Re: World population

Post by Atheist-Lite » Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:59 am

Birth controls leads to a unsustainable ageing population and this will have it's own catastrophic effects. The first world is plundering the third/second world for medical social care needs with its ageing population...all I'm saying is this will lead to overlooked backfiring feedback loops that'll almost certainly leed to more population growth elsewhere. The human population, as a whole, will continue to grow until natural limits are met....eventually brought down by things like contagious disease, warfare and resource depletion, climate change induced famine or a asteroid strike. Any plan to do with birth control must really include age control to prevent the burden of a ageing population overwhelming a smaller youth population. Otherwise it is going to fail, like it appears to be doing in the first world today. :smoke:
nxnxm,cm,m,fvmf,vndfnm,nm,f,dvm,v v vmfm,vvm,d,dd vv sm,mvd,fmf,fn ,v fvfm,

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests