PETA miffed at President Obama's fly "execution"
- Clinton Huxley
- 19th century monkeybitch.
- Posts: 23739
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: PETA miffed at President Obama's fly "execution"
I am so hungry right now.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"
AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!
http://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"
AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!
- Existentialist1844
- Clique Infiltrator
- Posts: 6373
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:45 pm
- About me: Trying to avoid existential despair.
- Contact:
Re: PETA miffed at President Obama's fly "execution"
Eat some flies. Maybe you can get Obama to kill some for you.Clinton Huxley wrote:I am so hungry right now.


"Anyone can give up, it's the easiest thing in the world to do. But to hold it together when everyone else would understand if you fell apart, that's true strength."


- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: PETA miffed at President Obama's fly "execution"
A fly for exi.Existentialist1844 wrote:Eat some flies. Maybe you can get Obama to kill some for you.Clinton Huxley wrote:I am so hungry right now.![]()
- ScholasticSpastic
- Inscrutable Inoculator
- Posts: 2942
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:50 am
- Location: In Absentia
- Contact:
Re: PETA miffed at President Obama's fly "execution"
There are two very valid reasons for an organism to kill another: Resource partitioning and resource partitioning.Xamonas Chegwé wrote: I don't believe Obama was intending to eat the fly, was he? Both Obama and the teenager killed an animal for no reason other than it happened to cross their path.
In one sense, predation is resource partitioning: All your resource are belong to me!
In another sense, protecting resources from predation is resource partitioning: Don't you fucking taint my food! *swat*
I leave flies alone outside. They do good work. But flies in my home constitute an unhealthy sharing of my resources. If my arachnid roommates were more efficient predators, I might let nature take its course, but I can kill a fly anywhere in my home without having to wait for it to stumble into a web.
Some people are particularly stupid and refuse to share their space with spiders. For them, manual fly killing is the only viable option. As I stated earlier, it tends to be more energy efficient than catching and releasing them, leaving more energy resources for sex or, in my case, forum whoring. I do treat parasitoid wasps differently than flies: they tend to produce fewer offspring and their benefits to humanity are significantly greater than just being a ready food source for other animals, so I will go out of my way to catch and release parasitoid wasps or more dangerous spiders (I tend to prefer living with spiders which don't pack quite so big a punch in the venom department. I particularly enjoy living with members of family Salticidae, as I can have all of the benefits of spider roommates without having to clean up old webs).
"You've got to be a real asshole to quote yourself!"
~ScholasticSpastic
(I am not a police officer. I am unarmed.)
~ScholasticSpastic
(I am not a police officer. I am unarmed.)
Re: PETA miffed at President Obama's fly "execution"
I reckon we should round them up and put them into gas chambers.
Damn flies
Damn flies

Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
Re: PETA miffed at President Obama's fly "execution"
Or Clinton Huxley's stew.Animavore wrote:I reckon we should round them up and put them into gas chambers.

no fences
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests