US Supreme Court Orders 46,000 criminals released

Post Reply
User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32530
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: US Supreme Court Orders 46,000 criminals released

Post by charlou » Tue May 24, 2011 3:33 am

It's probably worth pointing out that state police (South Australian Police, for example) are trained in all aspects of their roles as law enforcement officers, and that community policing is generally sensitive to the community demographic. Branches within the state police department take care of the various areas of crime prevention, law enforcement and community services.
no fences

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: US Supreme Court Orders 46,000 criminals released

Post by Warren Dew » Tue May 24, 2011 5:09 am

Adenosine wrote:Two, reduce the number of cops you have. Sounds counter-intuitive but it isn't. You have three or fours layers of cops in some areas and they all need to look busy. So they get busy busting people for stupid shit that everywhere else in the world would get them a raised eyebrow and a move on order. Why do you need city/town cops, county cops, highway cops, state cops and the FBI? All you need is state cops and the FBI.
I don't think you understand how things work here.

The only police I ever see are state police patrolling the expressways and local police everywhere else. Overlapping jurisdictions do not result in extra police. In fact, it's probably the opposite: FBI agents are more expensive than local police because they have to be trained in things local police don't have to know, so it would actually be far more expensive to have the FBI and state police doing everything.

Honestly, if you wanted to cut down on the levels of police, you'd get rid of the state police and the FBI and just have local police. The problem with that is that there would no longer be anyone to investigate police corruption.

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: US Supreme Court Orders 46,000 criminals released

Post by Warren Dew » Tue May 24, 2011 5:16 am

Coito ergo sum wrote:Simple solution. End incarceration for non-violent crimes. Create a system of tethered house arrest, where GPS encoded tethers or better yet, implants, are used to track the whereabouts of non-violent criminals. Have them restricted in movements outside of their jobs, and have them closely monitored with periodic check ins with a parole officer. That should free up plenty of space in the prison system.
It would also mean there would be a big increase in auto theft and similar crimes, since those people would never be incarcerated.

Decriminalize victimless crimes like drug use, sure. Some nonviolent crimes have victims, though.
Ian wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:I think we're just putting a lot of people in jail who ought not to be.
DEFINITELY. Such as a lot of marijuana-related convicts. And "three strikes" violators. And mandatory-minimum sentences. The prison population doesn't have to be nearly so high.
Other than those in for drug use, the "three strikes" convicts are the last ones that should be let out, since they're the ones who are practically guaranteed to commit more crimes.

User avatar
Atheist-Lite
Formerly known as Crumple
Posts: 8745
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:35 pm
About me: You need a jetpack? Here, take mine. I don't need a jetpack this far away.
Location: In the Galactic Hub, Yes That One !!!
Contact:

Re: US Supreme Court Orders 46,000 criminals released

Post by Atheist-Lite » Tue May 24, 2011 5:59 am

The prison system is a money making racket in the US. When the collapse is underway here in the UK we've only 80,000 prisoners on the street whilsts over in the US you'll have to deal with miliions (could execute them & turn them into biscuits and decend into barbarism that way).
nxnxm,cm,m,fvmf,vndfnm,nm,f,dvm,v v vmfm,vvm,d,dd vv sm,mvd,fmf,fn ,v fvfm,

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: US Supreme Court Orders 46,000 criminals released

Post by Gallstones » Tue May 24, 2011 6:01 am

Adenosine wrote:
Gallstones wrote:
Adenosine wrote:I said all along that states should have their police. I've also said that I don't get the point of county and town police. Or highway police for that matter. Can't state police drive on the highways? Would having to learn the Highway Code overheat their brains?

I've also never said that Americans are homogeneous. I know you aren't. Christ sake, your culture is the most invasive in the world, I can't fail to know. But how non-homogeneous are you? State to state I get that. But county to county, town to town? Does Bumfuck Montana think sister fucking is okay but the next town over, WeloveJesus Montana think that sex should only be between married couples over thirty years of age, with the lights off and their Minister in the room? Do they both frown on drug use? Murder? Theft?

Wait, stop.
We have city cops which are the same as county cops because a person pays their property taxes to the county.
We have state highway patrol.
We have federal Fish and Game et al.

And then the FBI.

Bumfuck Montana? Now you are being gratuitously insulting.
FYI, there is no We Love Jesus, Montana. People pretty much mind their own business. Read some of my comments about this.

You know nothing about us at all.
No, I'm not being gratuitously insulting, you're being gratuitously humourless. It's obvious you take Montana very seriously so I'll hold the humour.

Okay, so you have just city cops also known as county cops. Good for you. There are other parts of America, LA for instance, that has city and county cops. And of course state cops. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_enforc ... _of_police If you don't like it you can edit that page to make it more suitable to your lived experience.

Also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billings_Police_Department :smoke:

http://ci.billings.mt.us/index.aspx?nid=101 :smoke:

http://www.co.yellowstone.mt.gov/Sheriff/ :smoke:

But then, I know nothing about you at all. :smoke:

Great, now I have lung cancer.

Crap, included humour. Sorry.
:hilarious: Thank you for that.


I'm not apologizing for taking Montana seriously. This is a great place to live--the last best place.
What is with all the stuff about Billings?

BTW, you ignored this part
FYI, there is no We Love Jesus, Montana. People pretty much mind their own business. Read some of my comments about this.
  • :coffee:
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41170
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: US Supreme Court Orders 46,000 criminals released

Post by Svartalf » Tue May 24, 2011 7:57 am

Gawdzilla wrote:
MarkS wrote:Why does the us have such a large prison population? someone told me they are used as slave labour. is this true?
They're used as sex slaves for the Canadians.
That's not prison population, that's an elk flock
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41170
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: US Supreme Court Orders 46,000 criminals released

Post by Svartalf » Tue May 24, 2011 8:00 am

Azathoth wrote:In Iceland there is a waiting list to get into Butlins prison. If it is full you have to wait until there is a space to do your time. Strange fucking country sometimes.
and are offenders banished for 3 years while those who are already in finish their time?
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60954
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: US Supreme Court Orders 46,000 criminals released

Post by pErvinalia » Tue May 24, 2011 8:06 am

Adenosine wrote:
Gallstones wrote:
Adenosine wrote:I said all along that states should have their police. I've also said that I don't get the point of county and town police. Or highway police for that matter. Can't state police drive on the highways? Would having to learn the Highway Code overheat their brains?

I've also never said that Americans are homogeneous. I know you aren't. Christ sake, your culture is the most invasive in the world, I can't fail to know. But how non-homogeneous are you? State to state I get that. But county to county, town to town? Does Bumfuck Montana think sister fucking is okay but the next town over, WeloveJesus Montana think that sex should only be between married couples over thirty years of age, with the lights off and their Minister in the room? Do they both frown on drug use? Murder? Theft?

Wait, stop.
We have city cops which are the same as county cops because a person pays their property taxes to the county.
We have state highway patrol.
We have federal Fish and Game et al.

And then the FBI.

Bumfuck Montana? Now you are being gratuitously insulting.
FYI, there is no We Love Jesus, Montana. People pretty much mind their own business. Read some of my comments about this.

You know nothing about us at all.
No, I'm not being gratuitously insulting, you're being gratuitously humourless.
:lol: :clap:
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60954
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: US Supreme Court Orders 46,000 criminals released

Post by pErvinalia » Tue May 24, 2011 8:08 am

charlou wrote:It's probably worth pointing out that state police (South Australian Police, for example) are trained in all aspects of their roles as law enforcement officers, and that community policing is generally sensitive to the community demographic. Branches within the state police department take care of the various areas of crime prevention, law enforcement and community services.
Yep. Only one level of major bureaucracy vs. the 3 or more in the states.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: US Supreme Court Orders 46,000 criminals released

Post by Hermit » Tue May 24, 2011 10:55 am

MarkS wrote:Why does the us have such a large prison population? someone told me they are used as slave labour. is this true?
In 2009 Pennsylvanian judges Ciavarella and Conahan were discovered to have given hundreds of accused youths custodial sentences when non-custodial penalties would have been appropriate. They were getting kickbacks from privately owned and run juvenile gaols for each "customer" they thus delivered.

I think nobody should be gaoled for smoking pot. Does anyone know the number of prisoners in the USA who are clogging up the prison spaces that ought to be occupied by bona fide criminals?
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: US Supreme Court Orders 46,000 criminals released

Post by Coito ergo sum » Tue May 24, 2011 11:30 am

Warren Dew wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:Simple solution. End incarceration for non-violent crimes. Create a system of tethered house arrest, where GPS encoded tethers or better yet, implants, are used to track the whereabouts of non-violent criminals. Have them restricted in movements outside of their jobs, and have them closely monitored with periodic check ins with a parole officer. That should free up plenty of space in the prison system.
It would also mean there would be a big increase in auto theft and similar crimes, since those people would never be incarcerated.
Except that they would be tethered by GPS monitoring systems. If a car is reported stolen in a given area, then the first thing that would be checked would be which GPS tethers were in the vicinity at the time, and they should be set to allow movement only to and from designated places at designated times.
Warren Dew wrote:
Decriminalize victimless crimes like drug use, sure. Some nonviolent crimes have victims, though.
I agree, but with some some thought, a GPS based tether system can replace prisons for those who are non-violent, and that would end the unfortunate cycle wherein non-violent criminals become better criminals and even violent criminals as a result of the rigors of prison.
Warren Dew wrote:
Ian wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:I think we're just putting a lot of people in jail who ought not to be.
DEFINITELY. Such as a lot of marijuana-related convicts. And "three strikes" violators. And mandatory-minimum sentences. The prison population doesn't have to be nearly so high.
Other than those in for drug use, the "three strikes" convicts are the last ones that should be let out, since they're the ones who are practically guaranteed to commit more crimes.
I think if we all agree just to end prison terms for possession and personal use of drugs, and even sale of, drugs, a good deal of prison space would be freed up.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74293
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: US Supreme Court Orders 46,000 criminals released

Post by JimC » Tue May 24, 2011 11:31 am

Seth wrote:
Gallstones wrote:Legalizing marijuana would go a long way to taking some of the burden off the criminal justice system. It would create an entrepreneurial opportunity where people who are now felons and on the public dime would instead be legitimate businesspersons making money and contributing capital to their counties and the state. It would also remove the incentive for some crime based business.
What should happen is that all non-violent, non-dealer FEDERAL marijuana prisoners should be released, and the FEDERAL prisons should be stuffed with as many of the state felons as they can get away with, as a start.

Then all state marijuana non-violent, non-dealer prisoners should be released, and California, like every other state, should REFUSE to cooperate with the feds on marijuana investigations, arrests, bookings, trials or incarcerations.
Sounds good to me... :tup:
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: US Supreme Court Orders 46,000 criminals released

Post by Coito ergo sum » Tue May 24, 2011 11:33 am

rEvolutionist wrote:
charlou wrote:It's probably worth pointing out that state police (South Australian Police, for example) are trained in all aspects of their roles as law enforcement officers, and that community policing is generally sensitive to the community demographic. Branches within the state police department take care of the various areas of crime prevention, law enforcement and community services.
Yep. Only one level of major bureaucracy vs. the 3 or more in the states.
I'm not sure you have an accurate understanding of US law enforcement.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74293
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: US Supreme Court Orders 46,000 criminals released

Post by JimC » Tue May 24, 2011 11:37 am

Coito ergo sum wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:
charlou wrote:It's probably worth pointing out that state police (South Australian Police, for example) are trained in all aspects of their roles as law enforcement officers, and that community policing is generally sensitive to the community demographic. Branches within the state police department take care of the various areas of crime prevention, law enforcement and community services.
Yep. Only one level of major bureaucracy vs. the 3 or more in the states.
I'm not sure you have an accurate understanding of US law enforcement.
I must admit the rather large number of different organisations and levels of enforcement agencies in the US has puzzled me; one reads of examples where there is friction between them, to the detriment of efficiency...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Adenosine
Posts: 718
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 4:19 am
Contact:

Re: US Supreme Court Orders 46,000 criminals released

Post by Adenosine » Tue May 24, 2011 11:41 am

Gallstones wrote:
Adenosine wrote:
Gallstones wrote:
Adenosine wrote:I said all along that states should have their police. I've also said that I don't get the point of county and town police. Or highway police for that matter. Can't state police drive on the highways? Would having to learn the Highway Code overheat their brains?

I've also never said that Americans are homogeneous. I know you aren't. Christ sake, your culture is the most invasive in the world, I can't fail to know. But how non-homogeneous are you? State to state I get that. But county to county, town to town? Does Bumfuck Montana think sister fucking is okay but the next town over, WeloveJesus Montana think that sex should only be between married couples over thirty years of age, with the lights off and their Minister in the room? Do they both frown on drug use? Murder? Theft?

Wait, stop.
We have city cops which are the same as county cops because a person pays their property taxes to the county.
We have state highway patrol.
We have federal Fish and Game et al.

And then the FBI.

Bumfuck Montana? Now you are being gratuitously insulting.
FYI, there is no We Love Jesus, Montana. People pretty much mind their own business. Read some of my comments about this.

You know nothing about us at all.
No, I'm not being gratuitously insulting, you're being gratuitously humourless. It's obvious you take Montana very seriously so I'll hold the humour.

Okay, so you have just city cops also known as county cops. Good for you. There are other parts of America, LA for instance, that has city and county cops. And of course state cops. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_enforc ... _of_police If you don't like it you can edit that page to make it more suitable to your lived experience.

Also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billings_Police_Department :smoke:

http://ci.billings.mt.us/index.aspx?nid=101 :smoke:

http://www.co.yellowstone.mt.gov/Sheriff/ :smoke:

But then, I know nothing about you at all. :smoke:

Great, now I have lung cancer.

Crap, included humour. Sorry.
:hilarious: Thank you for that.


I'm not apologizing for taking Montana seriously. This is a great place to live--the last best place.
What is with all the stuff about Billings?
The Billings stuff was proving that you have city and county cops in one place. Billings PD and Yellowstone County cops. That's all. Just my little contribution to the smartass quotient of the universe.
Gallstones wrote:BTW, you ignored this part
FYI, there is no We Love Jesus, Montana. People pretty much mind their own business. Read some of my comments about this.
  • :coffee:
I didn't think you actually wanted an answer to that. I was pretty sure there was no Welovejesus Montana just as I was pretty sure there is no Bumfuck in Montana (because it's in Idaho dontchaknow?). I picked those names as allegories. I could have easily used Prudeville and Inbredton Montana. They served a purpose. For the rest, I'm happy for you, that you live in an area like that. Not everybody has that privilege.

Can I suggest that you don't take sweeping generalisations about the US to mean your little corner of paradise?

Also Queensland > Montana. Bigger, better beaches (lol), better Great Barrier Reef, better people (like me fer instance), better everything. :dance:
Ignore me, I'm just here for the Mafia.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests