sandinista wrote:Coito ergo sum wrote:Gawdzilla and Crumple.
Crumple? I had no problems with what he was writing...zilla, well, that's just silly.
I did not suggest you had a problem with either of their writings, and whether you had a problem with either of them is irrelevant.
sandinista wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:For all we know it will be worse, or the same.
That is a possibility. Sure.
Perhaps even likely, if history is a guide. Can you think of an example in history where something better has emerged? Monarchy? Oligarchy? Capitalism? Aristocracy? Fascism? It seems like the odds are not in favor of "something better" emerging - well, unless you have something specific you're thinking about that I'm missing. What do you consider a reasonable possibility?
sandinista wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:What better thing do you think will come of it?
Already covered.
No. You said what it would not be, which still left almost an infinite number of iterations possible. You never said what it was you were talking about. Don't worry, though, we all know why you evade being specific in that regard.
sandinista wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:Not to the degree that a greater global collapse would cause.
Speculation.
Reasonable conclusion based on the evidence. If the current state of affairs has produced the sordid state of affairs we have now, certainly a far worse state of affairs can reasonably be surmised to very probably produce an even more sordid state of affairs.
sandinista wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:The current situation is peanuts compared to what I was attempting to describe.
again, speculation. You want me to have a crystal ball, get one yourself. Prove what your saying.
We both appear to agree on the point that a global collapse will destroy the current system, don't we? You've made the assertion that you hope some better system will arise. I do too. I hope that a better system arises whether or not there is a global collapse. Everyone wants things to be better. The question is, however, do you have anything more specific than that? Or, are you just wishing for good things?
As for proving what I'm saying - do you really take issue with the fact that a global economic collapse that is worse than the turmoil we are in right now will cause greater negative effects world wide than we are experiencing now? First I want to make sure you are really taking issue with that statement.
sandinista wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:Hopeful for what? What do you hope for? (
already covered
Hasn't been, and you know it. What system do you see as a better system that might come out of the chaos? Or, if it could be one of many, give me one of your main examples - one of the top 3 - or the one you know the best and in most detail - or the one you think is most likely.
sandinista wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:Could you clue us in on what system you want to see born?
are you serious. You want an entire outline of an complete social/economic system written out for you on an internet forum.

Ask the impossible much?
No, not an entire outline. You could hit the high points, or at least give us the name of the system you're talking about.
If what you're suggesting you hope emerges is so indescribably complex, then who is going to facilitate its emergence? A bunch of people without the capacity to even articulate what they are trying to form?