Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Locked
User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Warren Dew » Sat May 19, 2012 12:22 am

maiforpeace wrote:Why did Zimmerman get out of his car?
Why should he have to stay in his car? He lives in the neighborhood. It's his home. He shouldn't have to lock himself in his car whenever there's a stranger around.

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by kiki5711 » Sat May 19, 2012 12:50 am

Warren Dew wrote:
maiforpeace wrote:Why did Zimmerman get out of his car?
Why should he have to stay in his car? He lives in the neighborhood. It's his home. He shouldn't have to lock himself in his car whenever there's a stranger around.
that makes absolutely no sense. why should he stay in his car? it's not like he's just parked there for the scenery. he was out looking for suspicious persons, and if he thought martin was suspicious he should have called 911 and stayed in his car. Just plain common sense.

What did he think he was going to accomplish by following martin? "a superman saves the day" in the morning paper?

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Warren Dew » Sat May 19, 2012 1:07 am

kiki5711 wrote:What did he think he was going to accomplish by following martin? "a superman saves the day" in the morning paper?
He thought Martin was a burglar. He probably figured he'd deter a burglary, or deter someone from casing a house for burglary. Maybe he did.

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by mistermack » Sat May 19, 2012 1:09 am

tattuchu wrote:I don't think he's a coward. If I were getting the shit beat out of me and in fear for my life, I'd have used my gun as well. I'm no fan of guns, but if I were in Zimmerman's shoes, I would be grateful I'd had one on me. What would be the preferable alternative to using it? Having my head bashed in? Dying? Would that be the brave thing to do?
So you're saying that everybody who gets in a fight, should have the right to kill their opponent?
Nice.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by mistermack » Sat May 19, 2012 1:13 am

Warren Dew wrote:
kiki5711 wrote:What did he think he was going to accomplish by following martin? "a superman saves the day" in the morning paper?
He thought Martin was a burglar. He probably figured he'd deter a burglary, or deter someone from casing a house for burglary. Maybe he did.
His only evidence for that was that the kid was black, and wearing a hoodie.
If that made him think Martin was a burglar, he's going to cop for a federal race-hate crime.
I hope he does.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Warren Dew » Sat May 19, 2012 1:38 am

mistermack wrote:
Warren Dew wrote:He thought Martin was a burglar. He probably figured he'd deter a burglary, or deter someone from casing a house for burglary. Maybe he did.
His only evidence for that was that the kid was black, and wearing a hoodie.
He might have had more evidence than that. He knew what kinds of behavior were normal for the neighborhood, and what were not.

And fortunately, it is not yet a crime in the U.S. for suspecting someone of being a burglar, whatever the reason.

User avatar
tattuchu
a dickload of cocks
Posts: 21889
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by tattuchu » Sat May 19, 2012 1:50 am

mistermack wrote:
tattuchu wrote:I don't think he's a coward. If I were getting the shit beat out of me and in fear for my life, I'd have used my gun as well. I'm no fan of guns, but if I were in Zimmerman's shoes, I would be grateful I'd had one on me. What would be the preferable alternative to using it? Having my head bashed in? Dying? Would that be the brave thing to do?
So you're saying that everybody who gets in a fight, should have the right to kill their opponent?
Nice.
If the other person was trying to kill you, sure. But of course a non-lethal solution would be preferable. If Zimmerman had been carrying a can of mace instead of a gun, he might have achieved the same result without killing someone in the process. I'm not so keen on guns. I don't think they're necessary. But if I were Zimmerman getting my head bashed in, I'd certainly be happy I had one on me.
People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.

But those letters are not silent.

They're just waiting their turn.

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by kiki5711 » Sat May 19, 2012 2:17 am

Warren Dew wrote:
kiki5711 wrote:What did he think he was going to accomplish by following martin? "a superman saves the day" in the morning paper?
He thought Martin was a burglar. He probably figured he'd deter a burglary, or deter someone from casing a house for burglary. Maybe he did.
that only shows that he's delusional/paranoid/and not fit for the job of neighborhood watch. It could have been anyone from the neighborhood, walking in the back, not dressed to well, and then what, zimmerman decided who's a potential burglar and who's not?

His job is to notify the police not be a superman.

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by kiki5711 » Sat May 19, 2012 2:19 am

Warren Dew wrote:
mistermack wrote:
Warren Dew wrote:He thought Martin was a burglar. He probably figured he'd deter a burglary, or deter someone from casing a house for burglary. Maybe he did.
His only evidence for that was that the kid was black, and wearing a hoodie.
He might have had more evidence than that. He knew what kinds of behavior were normal for the neighborhood, and what were not.

And fortunately, it is not yet a crime in the U.S. for suspecting someone of being a burglar, whatever the reason.
Ridiculous. Walking is now considered "suspicious"? and why would this particular person look suspicious? it was all in zimmerman's mind, not reality.

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by kiki5711 » Sat May 19, 2012 2:23 am

and what if some big dude dressed in army outfit was just going for a walk, and he lived there? would that look suspicious too? it seems a lot of things looked suspicious to zimmerman. he needs some deep psychiatric care and not a job as neighborhood watch.

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by maiforpeace » Sat May 19, 2012 2:23 am

Coito ergo sum wrote:
maiforpeace wrote:Why did Zimmerman get out of his car? He was advised to stay there.
He was not advised to stay in his car.
maiforpeace wrote:
He had his own gun, so his personal safety was not an issue while he remained in the car. Martin wasn't brandishing a weapon, and even if Martin taunted or threatened him verbally his only reason for leaving the car was an aggressive and offensive act. That is not self defense or being defensive.
The confrontation did not occur close to the time he got out of his car. He got out of his car, and he was on the phone with the 911 dispatcher. He was telling the dispatcher what he was seeing, and he was following Martin. You can hear the rustling as he's moving. He tells the dispatcher he is following the guy. The dispatcher says "we don't need you to do that." He responds, "o.k." You stop hearing the rustling. Zimmerman states that Martin has run off. He then walks around for about a minute and half to a minute and 45 seconds while coordinates with the dispatcher where to meet the cops.

Getting out of the car was not a hostile act any more than Martin walking around the neighborhood was a hostile act. He's a neighborhood watchman, coordinated with the police, and his job in that regard is to watch the neighborhood and report things. Based on the tape, that seems to be what he's doing.
maiforpeace wrote:
Granted, once he got out of his car it may have been self defense, but even then it must have happened really fast for them to get physical with each other so quickly before he had a chance to pull out his gun.
After the minute and a half chat with the dispatcher, he hangs up the phone. It is at some time after that that the altercation took place. So, it did not happen really soon after getting out of the car. According to the 911 audio tape, Zimmerman had lost sight of Martin.

We don't know how the fight started. We do know that Zimmerman's head is injured on the back and he had a beaten or even broken nose, and a witness told the cops that Martin was on top of him and beating him "mixed martial arts style." Shttp://us.mg205.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.partner=sbc&.rand=28646ujhc66e6o, according that evidence, when Zimmerman fired the gun, he was being beaten with Martin in the superior position.
OK, he wasn't advised to stay in the car. He decided on his own to get out of his car and start following a suspicious person, while simultaneously calling a dispatcher to inform them of this. They tell him not to follow Martin, yet he continues. Then whoops, he just loses the guy somewhere? Wouldn't you be on your guard then and have your gun out? What happened between them that encouraged this kid to take him on in a fight? I'm only interested in hearing about the scenarios that would make Zimmerman not culpable in any way of being aggressive and offensive and merely being defensive.
As I've indicated previously, I think that both were guilty of actions that contributed to Martin's death, and I'm further interested in understanding exactly how that will translate through the stand your ground law...because, sorry, I do think that this particular law had everything to do with how this will all come down in the end, despite many protestations by others here earlier in this thread.
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Warren Dew » Sat May 19, 2012 3:23 am

maiforpeace wrote:They tell him not to follow Martin
People keep saying this, and it's factually mistaken. They told him he didn't have to follow Martin; they never told him that he shouldn't follow Martin.

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by FBM » Sat May 19, 2012 4:46 am

"We don't need you to do that" is an ambiguous statement, I think.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Hermit » Sat May 19, 2012 4:50 am

FBM wrote:"We don't need you to do that" is an ambiguous statement, I think.
I read that as a polite way of telling Zimmerman to not follow the suspect.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by FBM » Sat May 19, 2012 4:56 am

Me, too. But it does stop short of being, "Don't do that". An informative/declarative statement, not actually an imperative.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 19 guests