Why should he have to stay in his car? He lives in the neighborhood. It's his home. He shouldn't have to lock himself in his car whenever there's a stranger around.maiforpeace wrote:Why did Zimmerman get out of his car?
Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...
- Warren Dew
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
- Location: Somerville, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...
- kiki5711
- Forever with Ekwok
- Posts: 3954
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
- Contact:
Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...
that makes absolutely no sense. why should he stay in his car? it's not like he's just parked there for the scenery. he was out looking for suspicious persons, and if he thought martin was suspicious he should have called 911 and stayed in his car. Just plain common sense.Warren Dew wrote:Why should he have to stay in his car? He lives in the neighborhood. It's his home. He shouldn't have to lock himself in his car whenever there's a stranger around.maiforpeace wrote:Why did Zimmerman get out of his car?
What did he think he was going to accomplish by following martin? "a superman saves the day" in the morning paper?
- Warren Dew
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
- Location: Somerville, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...
He thought Martin was a burglar. He probably figured he'd deter a burglary, or deter someone from casing a house for burglary. Maybe he did.kiki5711 wrote:What did he think he was going to accomplish by following martin? "a superman saves the day" in the morning paper?
- mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
- Contact:
Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...
So you're saying that everybody who gets in a fight, should have the right to kill their opponent?tattuchu wrote:I don't think he's a coward. If I were getting the shit beat out of me and in fear for my life, I'd have used my gun as well. I'm no fan of guns, but if I were in Zimmerman's shoes, I would be grateful I'd had one on me. What would be the preferable alternative to using it? Having my head bashed in? Dying? Would that be the brave thing to do?
Nice.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
- mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
- Contact:
Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...
His only evidence for that was that the kid was black, and wearing a hoodie.Warren Dew wrote:He thought Martin was a burglar. He probably figured he'd deter a burglary, or deter someone from casing a house for burglary. Maybe he did.kiki5711 wrote:What did he think he was going to accomplish by following martin? "a superman saves the day" in the morning paper?
If that made him think Martin was a burglar, he's going to cop for a federal race-hate crime.
I hope he does.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
- Warren Dew
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
- Location: Somerville, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...
He might have had more evidence than that. He knew what kinds of behavior were normal for the neighborhood, and what were not.mistermack wrote:His only evidence for that was that the kid was black, and wearing a hoodie.Warren Dew wrote:He thought Martin was a burglar. He probably figured he'd deter a burglary, or deter someone from casing a house for burglary. Maybe he did.
And fortunately, it is not yet a crime in the U.S. for suspecting someone of being a burglar, whatever the reason.
- tattuchu
- a dickload of cocks
- Posts: 21889
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
- About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
- Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
- Contact:
Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...
If the other person was trying to kill you, sure. But of course a non-lethal solution would be preferable. If Zimmerman had been carrying a can of mace instead of a gun, he might have achieved the same result without killing someone in the process. I'm not so keen on guns. I don't think they're necessary. But if I were Zimmerman getting my head bashed in, I'd certainly be happy I had one on me.mistermack wrote:So you're saying that everybody who gets in a fight, should have the right to kill their opponent?tattuchu wrote:I don't think he's a coward. If I were getting the shit beat out of me and in fear for my life, I'd have used my gun as well. I'm no fan of guns, but if I were in Zimmerman's shoes, I would be grateful I'd had one on me. What would be the preferable alternative to using it? Having my head bashed in? Dying? Would that be the brave thing to do?
Nice.
People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
- kiki5711
- Forever with Ekwok
- Posts: 3954
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
- Contact:
Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...
that only shows that he's delusional/paranoid/and not fit for the job of neighborhood watch. It could have been anyone from the neighborhood, walking in the back, not dressed to well, and then what, zimmerman decided who's a potential burglar and who's not?Warren Dew wrote:He thought Martin was a burglar. He probably figured he'd deter a burglary, or deter someone from casing a house for burglary. Maybe he did.kiki5711 wrote:What did he think he was going to accomplish by following martin? "a superman saves the day" in the morning paper?
His job is to notify the police not be a superman.
- kiki5711
- Forever with Ekwok
- Posts: 3954
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
- Contact:
Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...
Ridiculous. Walking is now considered "suspicious"? and why would this particular person look suspicious? it was all in zimmerman's mind, not reality.Warren Dew wrote:He might have had more evidence than that. He knew what kinds of behavior were normal for the neighborhood, and what were not.mistermack wrote:His only evidence for that was that the kid was black, and wearing a hoodie.Warren Dew wrote:He thought Martin was a burglar. He probably figured he'd deter a burglary, or deter someone from casing a house for burglary. Maybe he did.
And fortunately, it is not yet a crime in the U.S. for suspecting someone of being a burglar, whatever the reason.
- kiki5711
- Forever with Ekwok
- Posts: 3954
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
- Contact:
Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...
and what if some big dude dressed in army outfit was just going for a walk, and he lived there? would that look suspicious too? it seems a lot of things looked suspicious to zimmerman. he needs some deep psychiatric care and not a job as neighborhood watch.
- maiforpeace
- Account Suspended at Member's Request
- Posts: 15726
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
- Location: under the redwood trees
Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...
OK, he wasn't advised to stay in the car. He decided on his own to get out of his car and start following a suspicious person, while simultaneously calling a dispatcher to inform them of this. They tell him not to follow Martin, yet he continues. Then whoops, he just loses the guy somewhere? Wouldn't you be on your guard then and have your gun out? What happened between them that encouraged this kid to take him on in a fight? I'm only interested in hearing about the scenarios that would make Zimmerman not culpable in any way of being aggressive and offensive and merely being defensive.Coito ergo sum wrote:He was not advised to stay in his car.maiforpeace wrote:Why did Zimmerman get out of his car? He was advised to stay there.
The confrontation did not occur close to the time he got out of his car. He got out of his car, and he was on the phone with the 911 dispatcher. He was telling the dispatcher what he was seeing, and he was following Martin. You can hear the rustling as he's moving. He tells the dispatcher he is following the guy. The dispatcher says "we don't need you to do that." He responds, "o.k." You stop hearing the rustling. Zimmerman states that Martin has run off. He then walks around for about a minute and half to a minute and 45 seconds while coordinates with the dispatcher where to meet the cops.maiforpeace wrote:
He had his own gun, so his personal safety was not an issue while he remained in the car. Martin wasn't brandishing a weapon, and even if Martin taunted or threatened him verbally his only reason for leaving the car was an aggressive and offensive act. That is not self defense or being defensive.
Getting out of the car was not a hostile act any more than Martin walking around the neighborhood was a hostile act. He's a neighborhood watchman, coordinated with the police, and his job in that regard is to watch the neighborhood and report things. Based on the tape, that seems to be what he's doing.
After the minute and a half chat with the dispatcher, he hangs up the phone. It is at some time after that that the altercation took place. So, it did not happen really soon after getting out of the car. According to the 911 audio tape, Zimmerman had lost sight of Martin.maiforpeace wrote:
Granted, once he got out of his car it may have been self defense, but even then it must have happened really fast for them to get physical with each other so quickly before he had a chance to pull out his gun.
We don't know how the fight started. We do know that Zimmerman's head is injured on the back and he had a beaten or even broken nose, and a witness told the cops that Martin was on top of him and beating him "mixed martial arts style." Shttp://us.mg205.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.partner=sbc&.rand=28646ujhc66e6o, according that evidence, when Zimmerman fired the gun, he was being beaten with Martin in the superior position.
As I've indicated previously, I think that both were guilty of actions that contributed to Martin's death, and I'm further interested in understanding exactly how that will translate through the stand your ground law...because, sorry, I do think that this particular law had everything to do with how this will all come down in the end, despite many protestations by others here earlier in this thread.
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]
- Warren Dew
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
- Location: Somerville, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...
People keep saying this, and it's factually mistaken. They told him he didn't have to follow Martin; they never told him that he shouldn't follow Martin.maiforpeace wrote:They tell him not to follow Martin
- FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach" - Contact:
Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...
"We don't need you to do that" is an ambiguous statement, I think.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...
I read that as a polite way of telling Zimmerman to not follow the suspect.FBM wrote:"We don't need you to do that" is an ambiguous statement, I think.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach" - Contact:
Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...
Me, too. But it does stop short of being, "Don't do that". An informative/declarative statement, not actually an imperative.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 19 guests