All Things Biden: Is It Over Yet?

[Brian Peacock]

I just call those people "wrong".

[laklak]

"Wet-brained imbeciles" works.

[Cunt]

I won't try to paraphrase, the topics are too controversial for me to navigate here. Good for you for giving them a try though. Maybe they aren't as interesting as I thought.

You misunderstood my post. I expressed my dislike of being told that someone has "GREAT insights", then being expected to find them in a 90 minute podcast.

Sorry, but there are topics too contrary to talk about here. If you want to discuss the difficult subjects, you'll have to find someone willing.

[Cunt]

[Sean Hayden]

Mossad chief to meet Biden to press Israeli demands on Iran nuclear deal: Report
Meeting within the next month would make Yossi Cohen the first senior Israeli official to meet with the US president

Mossad head Yossi Cohen is set to meet with US President Joe Biden in Washington next month to discuss the Iran nuclear deal and Israel’s expectations for any overhaul of the treaty, Channel 12 news reported Saturday night.

Cohen, an major ally of Netanyahu, will be the first senior Israeli official to meet with US President Joe Biden, who was sworn in on 2o January.

In the first official contact between the Biden administration and the Israeli government, Israeli National Security Adviser Meir Ben-Shabbat, and his US counterpart, Jake Sullivan, spoke by phone on Saturday.

US National Security Council spokesperson Emily Horne said the two men had "discussed opportunities to enhance the partnership over the coming months, including by building on the success of Israel's normalisation arrangements with UAE, Bahrain, Sudan, and Morocco" and that "Mr Sullivan confirmed the United States will closely consult with Israel on all matters of regional security".

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/isra ... clear-deal

Didn't they just murder another Iranian scientist? Who's going to respect a contract with someone like that?

[Cunt]

Obama. Then Biden.

It doesn't matter that they shot down a planeload of Canadians, so why would one more scientist matter?

[Sean Hayden]

It's odd. It's just not believable that we expect this to work. So, what's the point?

[Cunt]

It's odd. It's just not believable that we expect this to work. So, what's the point?

I don't know, but it is about time that the US government ships giant piles of cash over there, to diplomacy. Political Justice.

[JimC]

...I would like to point out that not all right wing loonies are racists and not all racists are right wing loonies. Also, that not all loonies are right wing.

However, the intersection of those sets is very, very substantial.

[Tero]

Also, leftists believe in behaviors such as political correctness, whereas right wingers idolize Trump like authoritarians who simply repeat a lie over and over to followers. A lie they were likely to believe before Trump said it. Conspiracies are favorites. The leftie leader is replaced by a similar one, no idol needed.

[Cunt]

Yes, the left went so far into political correctness, it made liberals appear 'right-wing' when they defend basic freedoms.

'PC' was once mocked as standing for 'Pretentious Cocksucker', but now it is expected and required.

[Brian Peacock]

I won't try to paraphrase, the topics are too controversial for me to navigate here. Good for you for giving them a try though. Maybe they aren't as interesting as I thought.

You misunderstood my post. I expressed my dislike of being told that someone has "GREAT insights", then being expected to find them in a 90 minute podcast.

Sorry, but there are topics too contrary to talk about here. If you want to discuss the difficult subjects, you'll have to find someone willing.

[Brian Peacock]

Yes, the left went so far into political correctness, it made liberals appear 'right-wing' when they defend basic freedoms.

'PC' was once mocked as standing for 'Pretentious Cocksucker', but now it is expected and required.

'Political correctness' is a trigger word conservatives use to frighten each other.

[Cunt]

I won't try to paraphrase, the topics are too controversial for me to navigate here. Good for you for giving them a try though. Maybe they aren't as interesting as I thought.

You misunderstood my post. I expressed my dislike of being told that someone has "GREAT insights", then being expected to find them in a 90 minute podcast.

Sorry, but there are topics too contrary to talk about here. If you want to discuss the difficult subjects, you'll have to find someone willing.

Not sure what you mean by referencing the brave, noble chicken (other than that they are tasty)

Maybe someone courageous enough to talk with him about it will appear. For now, I won't know what he might say about it. I know what the science says though, and that is pretty useful.

[Brian Peacock]

Ah, so you know something which you think is pretty useful but you don't want to actually talk about it, because, erm, reasons...

Is that another of these great insights we keep hearing about, eh?