

Sucks to be you then, since no such society exists, has ever existed, or will ever exist.MrJonno wrote:Correct and nor would I want to, I also know nothing about how to survive a nuclear attack in a bunker or what to do if a wing falls of in an aircraft.But I wouldn't really expect you to understand anything at all about the tactics of armed encounters in the first place.
Far better to live in a society where that the chances of that are as minimised as possible instead of preparing for them which actually makes the chances of of it happening far more likely
Yeah I pretty much only like guns that are black, brown or stainless steel.Kristie wrote:My cousin has a bright pink one. I loathe it.hadespussercats wrote:It is pretty funny. No realistic waterpistols, either.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:That came from a series of events where realistic toy guns were brandished or pointed at police officers and they reacted. Separating the sheep from the goats.Animavore wrote:There's something hilarious about that.
But it makes sense. Especially since there are also people who make real guns look like toys, too-- painted goofy colors, all that.
It's sad.
The ancient Egyptians probably didn't have to know how to react to an armored shooter in a crowded movie theater, nor were they likely to find information on how to survive nuclear attacks or plane crashes useful.Seth wrote:Sucks to be you then, since no such society exists, has ever existed, or will ever exist.MrJonno wrote:Correct and nor would I want to, I also know nothing about how to survive a nuclear attack in a bunker or what to do if a wing falls of in an aircraft.But I wouldn't really expect you to understand anything at all about the tactics of armed encounters in the first place.
Far better to live in a society where that the chances of that are as minimised as possible instead of preparing for them which actually makes the chances of of it happening far more likely
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/2 ... 02740.htmlJames Holmes, Aurora Theater Gunman, May Have Used Federal Student Grants To Fund Shooting
James Holmes may have used grant money from the National Institutes of Health to purchase the weapons he allegedly used to kill 12 people and injure 58 others.
Wumbologist wrote:hadespussercats wrote: But it makes sense. Especially since there are also people who make real guns look like toys, too-- painted goofy colors, all that.
It's sad.
Many factors would come into play when making the shoot/don't shoot decision, including target identification and sight picture acquisition, what's in front of and beyond the target, what other risks might exist in taking a shot. In this specific scenario, because he was standing on the stage at the front of the house, the potential for hitting unwanted targets behind him was minimal, but the possibility of someone darting into the line of fire in the chaos was a very real possibility. However, given the fact that he was heavily armed and potentially could kill hundreds of people, I would have likely engaged him as best I could regardless of the potential for hitting someone darting into the line of fire. In such a situation, it's a matter of reducing the casualties, not necessarily avoiding all possible casualties.Twoflower wrote:Hey Seth, Would you engage the shooter if it was difficult to see from the tear gas he had tossed in the theater? If your eyesight was compromised wouldn't that mean you might accidentally hit someone else while aiming for the shooter? I'm curious if you would shoot no matter what, or decide based on other factors?
If I've got to die at the hands of a mass murderer, I'll admit I'd at least appreciate it if he took stainfighting into consideration.Seth wrote: they will use dynamite, plastic explosives or gallon glass jugs filled with Tide laundry detergent and gasoline to commit mass murder.
Wumbologist wrote:If I've got to die at the hands of a mass murderer, I'll admit I'd at least appreciate it if he took stainfighting into consideration.Seth wrote: they will use dynamite, plastic explosives or gallon glass jugs filled with Tide laundry detergent and gasoline to commit mass murder.
Tide laundry detergent + gasoline = homebrew napalm. Sticks and burns.Wumbologist wrote:If I've got to die at the hands of a mass murderer, I'll admit I'd at least appreciate it if he took stainfighting into consideration.Seth wrote: they will use dynamite, plastic explosives or gallon glass jugs filled with Tide laundry detergent and gasoline to commit mass murder.
But no stains!!!Seth wrote:Tide laundry detergent + gasoline = homebrew napalm. Sticks and burns.Wumbologist wrote:If I've got to die at the hands of a mass murderer, I'll admit I'd at least appreciate it if he took stainfighting into consideration.Seth wrote: they will use dynamite, plastic explosives or gallon glass jugs filled with Tide laundry detergent and gasoline to commit mass murder.
The gun is a symptom, not the disease.JimC wrote:Some of the responses here by gun enthusiasts are utterly surreal to anybody from the rest of the world outside the US... (yes, there is a world outside...)
They begin to suggest that the real problem is not too many guns, but not enough...
Arm everybody!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests