
US Philadelphia Student Carrying Legal Firearm Shoots It Out
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: US Philadelphia Student Carrying Legal Firearm Shoots It
Well...now you're taking all the fun out of it.... 

Re: US Philadelphia Student Carrying Legal Firearm Shoots It
Completely inaccurate most of them do make it back to somewhere with a roof, they fall over at least 3 times a week not just Sunday and whats this shit about only half.Half your women under 30 wake up drunk every Sunday morning in the gutter
But more importantly how is this a bad thing?, better than lets have the men take women on an expensive restuaurant without a guarantee of shag, thats fraud in my books!.
Sorry this just sounds like jealousy of a decent public transport system allowing women to become completely wasted and give geeks like me at least a chance to occassionaly have sex
When only criminals carry guns the police know exactly who to shoot!
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: US Philadelphia Student Carrying Legal Firearm Shoots It
MrJonno wrote:But more importantly how is this a bad thing?Half your women under 30 wake up drunk every Sunday morning in the gutter



Again with the "we're better than you" bullshit from a fucking Brit.MrJonno wrote: Sorry this just sounds like jealousy of a decent public transport system allowing women to become completely wasted and give geeks like me at least a chance to occassionaly have sex
Look - your country is the size of fucking a small US State. We have excellent public transport systems in the US -- prime examples are New York City and Chicago. There is plenty of public transport to get all over most major cities. We don't have subway systems in every town, though, for obvious reasons.
And, if you like banging fat chicks, you should be able to accomplish that feat without the need of alcohol...
Re: US Philadelphia Student Carrying Legal Firearm Shoots It
Even they expect a few beers!And, if you like banging fat chicks, you should be able to accomplish that feat without the need of alcohol..
When only criminals carry guns the police know exactly who to shoot!
- klr
- (%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
- Posts: 32964
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
- About me: The money was just resting in my account.
- Location: Airstrip Two
- Contact:
Re: US Philadelphia Student Carrying Legal Firearm Shoots It
People! People! Enough of this petty bickering I say, You must unite against your common enemy.
The French
The French

God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers
It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson



Re: US Philadelphia Student Carrying Legal Firearm Shoots It
The French think they are better than everyone else while we British just are 

When only criminals carry guns the police know exactly who to shoot!
- mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
- Contact:
Re: US Philadelphia Student Carrying Legal Firearm Shoots It
Jonesville ? Bit worse than a few drunken women ?



While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
- klr
- (%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
- Posts: 32964
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
- About me: The money was just resting in my account.
- Location: Airstrip Two
- Contact:
Re: US Philadelphia Student Carrying Legal Firearm Shoots It
"Drink the wine, they're coming!"
- from one old enough to remember the film made shortly after
- from one old enough to remember the film made shortly after
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers
It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson



- Gallstones
- Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
- Posts: 8888
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
- About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.
Re: US Philadelphia Student Carrying Legal Firearm Shoots It
mistermack wrote:Jonesville ? Bit worse than a few drunken women ?
Dammit mistermack, you know how to put a punch behind your posts.
Emotive manipulation is kind of in poor form don't you think?
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
Re: US Philadelphia Student Carrying Legal Firearm Shoots It
Sure it does, because you don't have a point, you have a fallacious opinion based in gross ignorance, hoplophobia, and an irrational fear of your fellow man. People in cars are far, far more dangerous to you than I, or any other law-abiding gun-carrying citizen, and that's just a fact.Clinton Huxley wrote:I've never questioned your fantasticalness but a handful of car-related anecdotes do not really refute my point.Wumbologist wrote:Clinton Huxley wrote:Anecdotes. Well done,old chap.Wumbologist wrote:http://articles.latimes.com/1994-10-10/ ... bus-driverClinton Huxley wrote: Nobody gets into their car to commit a massacre, at a school or university say, with the intention of running dozens of people over.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akihabara_massacre
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-10837287
Factual news stories are not anecdotes. You claimed nobody gets into a car to commit a massacre, and I've just shown that they do. Nobody will think less of you if you go ahead and admit that you're wrong and I'm right and that makes me fantastic.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
- Robert_S
- Cookie Monster
- Posts: 13416
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
- About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
Re: US Philadelphia Student Carrying Legal Firearm Shoots It
'Twas a Chevy Van what my neighbor used to kill his roomy a few weeks back.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
- amok
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:23 am
- About me: Bearer of bad news.
- Location: Nova Scotia
- Contact:
Re: US Philadelphia Student Carrying Legal Firearm Shoots It
It's very odd and unpleasant (for me) to read the insults from both sides of this debate.
It really does require a massive leap of logic, in my opinion, to believe that Americans who carry guns are either psychotic or paranoid. It doesn't take into account at all the social/historical factors that make it acceptable, normal (or even desirable), depending on where one lives in the country. I also have been educated about (legal) gun ownership/use in the U.S., in that I now know that it's not quite the gun-happy free-for-all that it's sometimes portrayed. Depending on the state, there does seem to be quite a bit of gun ownership legislation.
However, it also takes a big leap to get to the belief that the unarmed, either in America or in other countries, are fearful so-called sheeple.
A few people have suggested we're walking targets. I don't believe that. I honestly have very, very little to fear in the way of being victimized, and that's how I live my life. And, yes, I know, there's always the off chance, but I long ago decided that other than using basic common sense and knowing a few basic self-defence tactics, it's not good (just for me, personally, because I know my own mind and abilities), to embrace the "possible victim" mentality. It just wouldn't work, for me.
And to be fair, I believe part of that involves my overall world view and personal attitude, which means I will walk where I want, when I want, and let the chips fall where they may. Maybe that attitude actually inhibits those who would victimize someone else, but I don't think there's anyway of knowing that. As an aside, I recently had a very amusing argument with someone about how tall I am - I'm average height (five-foot-four) for a woman my age (I'll be 54 in a couple of months, and I say my age because I know average height is going up with later generations), and this person was INSISTING I was taller. I think it's because I "stand" straight and tall. I also take long, purposeful strides, in general, because that's my nature.
Anyway... so, while I can appreciate that legal gun-owners in America can be both capable and responsible, and certainly aren't de facto nuts, it doesn't mean that people in other countries who opt for stricter gun-control laws are blind slaves to some kind of master class. We democratically elect, year after year and decade after decade, the people who enact the type of gun-control laws we like.
Finally, even if I was somehow magically dropped into a dangerous city in America (or elsewhere, where I would be allowed to carry a handgun for self-defence), I still wouldn't. I'd rely on other methods. And it's not because I'm afraid of guns. It's because I know myself. Half the time, I can't even get my cellphone out of my handbag in time to catch the call. If I was relying on a pistol in my purse to save myself, I'd also have to rely on an attacker patiently waiting while I got it out.
It really does require a massive leap of logic, in my opinion, to believe that Americans who carry guns are either psychotic or paranoid. It doesn't take into account at all the social/historical factors that make it acceptable, normal (or even desirable), depending on where one lives in the country. I also have been educated about (legal) gun ownership/use in the U.S., in that I now know that it's not quite the gun-happy free-for-all that it's sometimes portrayed. Depending on the state, there does seem to be quite a bit of gun ownership legislation.
However, it also takes a big leap to get to the belief that the unarmed, either in America or in other countries, are fearful so-called sheeple.
A few people have suggested we're walking targets. I don't believe that. I honestly have very, very little to fear in the way of being victimized, and that's how I live my life. And, yes, I know, there's always the off chance, but I long ago decided that other than using basic common sense and knowing a few basic self-defence tactics, it's not good (just for me, personally, because I know my own mind and abilities), to embrace the "possible victim" mentality. It just wouldn't work, for me.
And to be fair, I believe part of that involves my overall world view and personal attitude, which means I will walk where I want, when I want, and let the chips fall where they may. Maybe that attitude actually inhibits those who would victimize someone else, but I don't think there's anyway of knowing that. As an aside, I recently had a very amusing argument with someone about how tall I am - I'm average height (five-foot-four) for a woman my age (I'll be 54 in a couple of months, and I say my age because I know average height is going up with later generations), and this person was INSISTING I was taller. I think it's because I "stand" straight and tall. I also take long, purposeful strides, in general, because that's my nature.
Anyway... so, while I can appreciate that legal gun-owners in America can be both capable and responsible, and certainly aren't de facto nuts, it doesn't mean that people in other countries who opt for stricter gun-control laws are blind slaves to some kind of master class. We democratically elect, year after year and decade after decade, the people who enact the type of gun-control laws we like.
Finally, even if I was somehow magically dropped into a dangerous city in America (or elsewhere, where I would be allowed to carry a handgun for self-defence), I still wouldn't. I'd rely on other methods. And it's not because I'm afraid of guns. It's because I know myself. Half the time, I can't even get my cellphone out of my handbag in time to catch the call. If I was relying on a pistol in my purse to save myself, I'd also have to rely on an attacker patiently waiting while I got it out.
Last edited by amok on Thu Sep 29, 2011 2:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me, but it can keep him from lynching me, and I think that's pretty important.
- Martin Luther King Jr.
- Martin Luther King Jr.
- Gallstones
- Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
- Posts: 8888
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
- About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.
Re: US Philadelphia Student Carrying Legal Firearm Shoots It
Guns do have a unique utility.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
- amok
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:23 am
- About me: Bearer of bad news.
- Location: Nova Scotia
- Contact:
Re: US Philadelphia Student Carrying Legal Firearm Shoots It
Pardon?Gallstones wrote:Guns do have a unique utility.
It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me, but it can keep him from lynching me, and I think that's pretty important.
- Martin Luther King Jr.
- Martin Luther King Jr.
- Gallstones
- Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
- Posts: 8888
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
- About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.
Re: US Philadelphia Student Carrying Legal Firearm Shoots It
They are designed to perform a select function.amok wrote:Pardon?Gallstones wrote:Guns do have a unique utility.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 10 guests