mistermack wrote:
Well, it's a theory, but not a very good one.
You are hinting that it had to be one, or the other. That's rubbish.
Yeah, a man eating the face off another man couldn't have torn open his carotid, given the time and opportunity to inflict more damage.
As I've already pointed out, the cop had other options. Much better options that didn't involve nearly killing the man he was supposed to be rescuing.
None of the other options you've pointed out would have been acceptable, according to his training. Too much potential risk to himself, too much opportunity for the situation to get worse. I've explained why a law enforcement officer would not want to get close in on a situation like this with what information they had available, whether or not you choose to accept those reasons isn't something I can control, I can't make logic happen in your head if it won't on its own.
But that's what happens, when stupid people carry guns. What little brains they had stop working, and all they can think of is pulling the trigger.
To be honest I find stupid people with internet access much more unsettling.
It took the loony about twenty minutes to do all that damage to the guy's face. He clearly wasn't going to die within seconds.
But seconds is all it would have taken for the cop to pull his baton, and do enough damage to stop the attack.
Monday. Morning. Quarterback. This is all after the fact speculation about what COULD have happened if he did something your way instead of his. Yes, this man COULD have killed his victim within seconds. The carotid artery is relatively accessible, and if he was already tearing off chunks of the man's face it would have been no big deal for him to move a few inches down and bite straight through that. Victim would have bled out before the cop even closed the distance with his baton.
If the cop had killed the guy by hitting him too hard with the baton, nobody would have blamed him. And at least he wouldn't have shot the victim.
It doesn't seem anyone with the faintest sense of reason is blaming him for his actions as they transpired anyway.