If they hire you while you're pregnant, they become obligated to provide you with, I believe, six weeks of unpaid family medical leave when you deliver, which means they lose your work capacity for a time, and have to find a replacement temporarily and train that person, and they have to keep your job open for you until you return.hadespussercats wrote:Thanks for pointing out that last bit-- might help shut Seth up. Well, probably not.Robert_S wrote:Hades, What was Warren's question that you passed along?
You might have a point about being pregnant and that being in some way -I don't know of oppressive is the right word- maybe intimidating or emotionally distressing to women who are already facing emotional stress.
And i love Planned Parenthood. I used to get condoms from them occasionally when I was broke.
And I would totally understand if PP decided I might upset abortion clients (though when I went there, one of my doctors was heavily showing-- and my interviewer pointed out something similar in our meeting.) After all, that concern was why I brought up my pregnancy in the interview in the first place-- I wasn't showing then. I could have just kept my mouth shut. It'd be nice if they said so, though.
I wonder if the reason they haven't is because telling me they're turning me down because of pregnancy might open them up to a discrimination suit. (I wouldn't sue-- but they might not believe that.)
But I don't see how my pregnancy would cause a problem if I was working at a computer or preparing mailings in the offices next door.
Warren wanted to know if it was possible to donate directly to his local clinic, instead of making a donation to the national organization.
In France, you have a right by law to get your old job back for up to THREE YEARS after you have had a child, and you get paid by the government to have the child to boot. I have acquaintances who are French citizens, and the woman was a high-level bank executive. She got pregnant and left her job to raise her child, and then got pregnant THREE MORE TIMES within 3 years of the last birth, which means that she was able to get paid and return to her job FIFTEEN YEARS after she left it, and they were required by law to put her back in her old position, at her old pay scale, which meant firing the person they had replaced her with after 15 years of service. And she was 15 years behind the power curve in banking and has had to be massively reeducated, at company expense, not to mention the waste of money associated with firing her stand-in. It probably cost the bank more than a million dollars over 15 years to obey French maternity leave laws. That's hardly good business practice.
The only reason she's not still sucking at the French public teat is that she failed to get pregnant in time after the birth of her last child, although she tried very hard to do so. She intended to milk the system for the rest of her life if she'd been able to do so.
Totally fucked up, the French, and they deserve what they get, which is economic bankruptcy.