
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ds-newsxml
They certainly don't deserve that, but they do deserve the normal criminal penalties for their misdeeds. "Everyone else was doing it, guv" is not a valid defense in law...Psychoserenity wrote:I'm getting really sick of hearing, particularly on facebook and youtube, that people "deserve" to be shot.
I'd like to see the evidence that white collar crime costs "billions" "every year".The Red Fox wrote:The City was convenient to use in my analogy to make a point about the use of the military.Cormac wrote:In point of fact, it is the City that pays for the lions share of public services.The Red Fox wrote:At worst, the damage of these riots will cost something along the lines of millions of pounds.
White-collar financial crime such as fraud, embezzlement and tax evasion is theft and looting of resources which costs the economy tens of billions of pounds each and every year.
If we're going to impose martial law in London, something which nobody seems to understand the implications of, the army also needs to be deployed in the City of London to stop these white-collar thieves and looters who systematically rob billions from the economy each year for their personal gain. We're all in this together, after all.
Also, the Blair-Brown axis kissed the arse of the City right through their terms of office, and THEY followed very silly policies that certainly threw fuel on the fire of the rampant idiocy in the markets.
BUT, the accusation you level against the city is not correct.
Do you not agree that financial crimes; fraud, embezzlement and tax evasion, cost this country billions every year? Do you not agree that is a form of looting? I was trying to highlight the disparity in policing and what the public expect from police. We're willing to crack down hard on rioters (rightly so in this instance), who maybe kick off once in a decade or two and cause a few million pounds worth of damage, but do nothing at all to crack down on the rampant financial crimes being committed in this country (and citizens of this country living in tax havens) on a regular basis.
Did I say that politics, sociology, or economics have nothing to say on the issue?Exi5tentialist wrote:So what do you think, Bella F.? Do politics, sociology or economics offer any legitimate explanations for the rioting? Any thoughts?Bella Fortuna wrote:This thread needs to be moved to 'Yes it is etc.'As could a number of threads that go the predictable route of being dominated by a few oft-repeated ideologies.
Robert_S wrote:No, I meant what is the motivation for the location?Exi5tentialist wrote:Be careful. Incitement, don't you know.Robert_S wrote:Why don't these guys go down to the financial district and raise hell?
Although apparently it's ok to incite politicians to shoot the thugs, use baton rounds and plastic bullets to take their eyes out or taze them into cardial arrhythmia, but , you know, upsetting the financial district, that's just beyond the pale.
I know that the right finances and skin color mean you can get away with more crimes, but does that excuse criminality? If it were retaliatory criminality then I'd have a great deal more sympathy but as it stands, these fuckers are just acting like the investment bankers that screwed us all.
I think all this hatred of the Middle Class is hilarious, especially:Crumple wrote:It's capatalism. These are not looters, their the next generation of entrepeneurs removing stock from a weakened and incompetant former middle class. Starting small but this is The Big Society in action, the new middle class claiming what is theirs. Their main mission right now is to increase access, announce their presence, and help overcome the digital divide.Warren Dew wrote:Warren Dew wrote:Evidently it's been implemented in at least a few neighborhoods in London.Exi5tentialist wrote:Well yeah but I'd like to know where you think this concept of 'socialism' as you call it has been implemented. 13 years of Labour Government does not a socialist society make. Actually this Labour Party probably couldn't achieve it in 130 years.Warren Dew wrote: It's not all that roundabout. For those used to living on government handouts under socialism, the concept of private property becomes blurred and even seen as illegitimate and looting then does come to be seen as "getting their share of tax money". To the extent Rum doesn't see that, I agree with Exi5stentialist that he doesn't understand how socialism actually works.Not a joke at all. It's an excellent example of what attitudes and actions, in practice, real socialism encourages.Exi5tentialist wrote:Oh I see - a joke.
Did you read that while having your Middle Class coffee break?Crumple wrote:There's a pincer strategy here with people, of the same kind as the looters but wearing suits, on the floor of the stock exchange looting the pension savings of the same incompetant former middle class who foolishly spread a bet on a imaginary boom. As this middle class broadsheet shows.![]()
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ds-newsxml
Why is it not for you to supply answers?Crumple wrote:I blame the digital camera(in part). Rum wouldn't be half as demoralised if the camera was not present. And I think worklessness is only half the issue(there was that in the eighties but the riots then did not spark organised looting) - there's relentlous violence on the media and through computer games nowadays, these are products of people with aspirations so the social malaise, which is very real, is across society. It is not for me to supply answers but I do think the media, the new social media and those in public office should all genuflect on the model of conduct they are setting the youth of today. We are engaged in countless dodgy military conflicts abroad and imagine this kind of rank behaviour on the international stage won't come home and haunt us?
Ooops.When Britain first, at Heaven's command
Arose from out the azure main;
This was the charter of the land,
And guardian angels sang this strain:
"Rule, Britannia! rule the waves:
"Britons never will be slaves."
Users browsing this forum: Tero and 21 guests