All Things Trump: the story continues...

[Cunt]

Oh, I already knew they lied this way. After seeing several examples of them doing character attacks on their opponents, I stopped taking them seriously.

He is gonna get the hat trick. I know it's hard to impeach a guy who is out of office, but this is Trump. They hate him enough. It's going to be a hat trick.

[Joe]

What's that saying about people who live in glass houses?

[Cunt]

I don't know how that applies, the Dems have been impeaching him for four and a half years almost. I think the hat-trick is the virtue signal they need, to show how fearlessly and publicly they hate Trump.

[Joe]

You forgot. Tsk, tsk.

[Cunt]

He's still gonna get the hat trick.

Or is there more 'story continues'? The impeachment has concluded with as much consequence as the first one he enjoyed.

I don't know what they'll charge him with for the third one, but they clearly don't have to be real crimes from the big list of crimes 'code'. I think he can do it. Maybe if he says something mean again it'll get them going. Is he testifying?

[Joe]

[Cunt]

I would say that after the first impeachment went off like a wet fart, that the second one was beating a dead horse.

But I still think he can get a third impeachment. There is PLENTY of hate left in the Dems...they act like he is still their president lol

[Tero]

"He was just doing what Hillary did!" Er, no.

Fact check: What Trump's attorney says he said, and what he actually said
Trump attorney Michael van der Veen claimed on Friday that the president was not in fact trying to derail the certification of the 2020 election results on Jan. 6.

“The entire premise of his remarks was that the democratic process would and should play out according to the letter of the law, including both the Constitution and the Electoral Count Act,” van der Veen said.

But here’s what Trump actually said in his Jan. 6 speech:

“All of us here today do not want to see our election victory stolen by emboldening radical left Democrats which is what they're doing and stolen by the fake news media," Trump said.

He continued: “Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore, and that's what this is all about. And to use a favorite term that all of you people really came up with, we will stop the steal.”

Later, Trump told gathered attendees that he would march on the Capitol with them, where he said it was "up to Congress to confront this egregious assault on our democracy."

Van der Veen went on to claim that Trump was simply advocating for future voting restrictions.

Here’s what Trump said, at the very end of his address: “In addition to challenging the certification of the election, I'm calling on Congress and the state legislatures to quickly pass sweeping election reforms, and you better do it before we have no country left."
Jonathan Allen

6m ago / 11:40 AM CST
Analysis: What Hillary Clinton didn’t do
Trump lawyer Michael van der Veen argued that Trump just did what Democrats did when Hillary Clinton lost: challenge the results, seek recounts and push to reject the certification of electors.

What Hillary Clinton did not do is rally her supporters in Washington, ask them to go to the Capitol, tell them to “stop the steal” and praise them after they stormed the Capitol and looked to kill or otherwise harm elected officials. The reason that she didn’t offer that encouragement is twofold. First, she, at every turn, starting from her concession speech the day after the 2016 election — Trump never gave one — made a point of embracing the rule of law. Second, her supporters didn’t storm the Capitol or threaten elected officials during a riot at the Capitol.

“I still believe in America and I always will. And if you do, then we must accept this result and then look to the future. Donald Trump is going to be our president,” she said on Nov. 9, 2016. “Our constitutional democracy enshrines the peaceful transfer of power and we don’t just respect that — we cherish it."

The whole point of the managers' arguments this week was to demonstrate the difference between legal political discourse and a president inciting his supporters to attack Congress and his vice president.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald ... BlogHeader

[Tero]

Trump starting a riot 4 years later is the Democrats' fault cause they would never believe he got elected

Sen. Ron Johnson, a Republican from Wisconsin, offered up a full-throated endorsement of the defense’s presentation, saying that “the President's lawyers blew the house managers' case out of the water.”

“They just legally eviscerated what the House managers put in front. I mean, the fact of the doctored and falsified facts, starting out with that. But again the video is just powerful I mean we all know that,” he said.

Johnson also charged that incitement began four years ago, and came from Democrats against the former President.

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/ ... 4a1e94757b

[Tero]

[Tero]

Trump lost on account of the negro block voting:
https://mobile.twitter.com/Politidope/s ... 3179472896

[Tero]

Kevin McCarthy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_McC ... olitician)
called Trump during the insurrection, asking Trump to call off his supporters.
Trump: Well Kevin, those people obviously care more about the election than you do.

He did nothing.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/12/politics ... index.html

Trump defense called it hearsay. No such phone call.

[JimC]

Phone company records?

[Tero]

Probably not. He would only talk to republicans on phone.

[Tero]

Go Bernie!
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/538 ... -during-qa