All Things Canada Eh

[pErvinalia]

At least one presumes that Canadian elected representatives don't benefit from egregious manipulation of their constituency boundaries to ensure the dominance of a party with consistently few votes than their rivals, as their cousins across the Southern border are want to do.

Gerrymandering isn't limited to the actions of one side down there.

But of course it is only one side that you care about.

[Brian Peacock]

Maybe they ARE 'want to do' it (whatever that means)

If you meant 'wont to do', then it makes a bit more sense, but both sides of the border will play all the dirty games they can.

Curious. I really don't think you can blame me for your own assumption that I was talking about, or taking a pop at, one particular party.

Nonetheless, 'want to do' simply means to wish, need, or desire to do something.

If both sides are as bad as each other why do you choose to bat for one particular side against the other?

[Cunt]

Because one side (the left) is consistently enraged by those on the right having freedoms.

The left, in particular commies, can't abide freedoms like owning property, or being allowed to speak freely. It's why they got so darned angry when Musk took twitter away from them.

[Brian Peacock]

How many people do you know who actually believe or advocate for the rescinding of all property rights, nationalisation of the means of production, or a violent revolution against the state etc? Seems to me that the Communists Of The Mind have far more power and are far more threatening to you than the communists of reality. I find it interesting that you should bemoan 'The Left' of twitter for getting angry at Musk when virtually the entire right, far-right, and alt-right are mobilised and motivated around a weaponisation of the politics of grievance. One suspects there's rather a lot of psychological projection coming from that quarter.

[Cunt]

They did.

Consider for the moment, that all western countries (the successful ones) got a 'Mass Immigration'. Show me where those countries voted for it.

Consider, in the next moment, any western country that resisted such. Are they labeled 'far right' or 'evil'?

Do citizens own their countries? Or does the UN compaq on migration, and the various commie agendas own them?

[NineBerry]

[Joe]

[macdoc]

Or does the UN compaq on migration, and the various commie agendas own them?

Oh will you stop with the World Government shite.....it gets realllllly irksome. FFS grow up.

[Cunt]

Or does the UN compaq on migration, and the various commie agendas own them?

Oh will you stop with the World Government shite.....it gets realllllly irksome. FFS grow up.

I am growed up. Plenty enough to recognize when world government organizations rule over nations.

If you don't know the facts, go learn them. For instance, the w in 'WHO' is bullshit. The Chinese-owned group outed themselves years ago. Did you catch it? Or do you still suppose they represent the world health concerns, over their commie bullshit?

[Brian Peacock]

Or does the UN compaq on migration, and the various commie agendas own them?

Oh will you stop with the World Government shite.....it gets realllllly irksome. FFS grow up.

I am growed up. Plenty enough to recognize when world government organizations rule over nations.

If you don't know the facts, go learn them. For instance, the w in 'WHO' is bullshit. The Chinese-owned group outed themselves years ago. Did you catch it? Or do you still suppose they represent the world health concerns, over their commie bullshit?

Those 'talking points' are from over the border. Why not give an example of how the World Government impacts Canada rather than repeating the bleating about how a rules-based international order is a real pisser for US plutocrats (and Israel) instead.

[Tyrannical]

Dear Canada,

Please save us from the Evil Republicans! Only by joining can we be strong enough to stop their evil plans!

Signed,
Not-Trump

[Cunt]

Or does the UN compaq on migration, and the various commie agendas own them?

Oh will you stop with the World Government shite.....it gets realllllly irksome. FFS grow up.

I am growed up. Plenty enough to recognize when world government organizations rule over nations.

If you don't know the facts, go learn them. For instance, the w in 'WHO' is bullshit. The Chinese-owned group outed themselves years ago. Did you catch it? Or do you still suppose they represent the world health concerns, over their commie bullshit?

Those 'talking points' are from over the border. Why not give an example of how the World Government impacts Canada rather than repeating the bleating about how a rules-based international order is a real pisser for US plutocrats (and Israel) instead.

The fact that you think the UN compak on immigration, or the WHO, don't affect Canada informs me on how seriously to take your questions.

Those 'talking points' as you call them, are just points.

[Brian Peacock]

How does the WHO, for example, impact Canada and what is bad about that impact?

[macdoc]

Cunt
Take the comments about the shite you are dishing out seriously enough that the actual "powers that be" on this board may have had enough.

[Cunt]

How does the WHO, for example, impact Canada and what is bad about that impact?

The WHO leadership was caught hanging up their call, rather than answering whether Taiwan is a country.

So maybe lets start there. Is the who a 'world' org? Or doing China's bidding?