NineBerry wrote:Both the penis and the vagina produce secrets..

NineBerry wrote:Both the penis and the vagina produce secrets..
Secretions! For God's sake. Stupid English language!pErvin wrote:NineBerry wrote:Both the penis and the vagina produce secrets..
It's a pretty sound argument, although it's not the argument being made.Animavore wrote:Beating a child is obviously wrong, but the odd smack won't hurt them.
Another version of the "degrees of harm" argument.
If it was extremely painful, I would certainly not like it. I did some googling, and this seems to be a problem with some small percentage of penises, not a selling point.NineBerry wrote:It's like talking to a blind person about colours. The glans touching a dry object without lubrication is VERY intense. You can certainly get used to it, but do you want to?
Interesting, but hardly particularly relevant to the discussion of the relative merits of circumcision.NineBerry wrote: I remember the first time I saw a porn video of a cut person masturbating by going on forcefully throbbing his glans for minutes without lubrication. I cancelled masturbation plans for that night, such a shock was this.
What people?Forty Two wrote:. So far, nobody else has posted anything in the way of evidence, outside of people who aren't circumcised declaring that they personally suffer extreme, almost debilitating, pain if the head of their penis so much as brushes against a piece of fabric.
Yes, that's one. You mentioned "people". That's a plural, boss.Forty Two wrote:Mistermack, for example.
Nineberry mentioned something similar. He said that it is "VERY intense" if the penis head touches fabric, and he says "you can get used to it, but do you want to?" That didn't sound like he was referring to it feeling good, but intense. It sounds like it's something unpleasant. In context, he seemed to be agreeing with mistermack, although I don't think he used the word "pain."pErvin wrote:Yes, that's one. You mentioned "people". That's a plural, boss.Forty Two wrote:Mistermack, for example.
They won't, and the benefits outweigh the downsides, according to the recent data. Or, do you have some other data to present?Animavore wrote:They won't remember it. That's actually an argument I've heard.
Rohypnol victims don't either.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests