Problem is you are assuming I think either side desires and end to the occupation and as I have said several times I do not think they do. I'm not sure your question about "lands being occupied" are genuine because you've either read nothing about this conflict (which is false) or you don't accept the International community, the International Court of Justice, the U.N. General assembly and the Security council, the European Union the Arab League nor the humanitarian groups definition that there is an occupation of the lands, as such use "occupied" in quote like that if you wish or even "disputed territories" as the Israelis would have it. Still I'll be generous and consider you ignorant.Coito ergo sum wrote:Audley Strange wrote:Wait a minute though. During the time of Arafat and the P.L.O. Israel gave support to Islamist groups like Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood in order to undermine the popularity of the more secular nationalist P.L.O. within Palestine. You know, just like the U.S. supported Islamist groups to undermine the Soviets (with help from Egypt and Israel too.)
So what does this tell us other than Israel will do anything and support anyone that impedes the end of this occupation? They do not wish for a solution because peace in the region means they are a trivial little squirt of a nation that no-one would give one single fuck about. The same also applies for the Islamist groups.
Quick questions as an aside -- what would Israel have to do to "end the occupation?" Which lands are the lands being occupied? And, what lands does Hamas think are "occupied?"
The occupied territories are the lands grabbed in the 6 day war. The Golan Heights, The West Bank East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip, which are globally considered Palestinian Territory.
However if you are asking me as a hypothetical what I think? I think there should be a single state solution.