Wumbologist wrote:
And Switzerland, which does have comparative ease of access for handguns, somehow magically doesn't count because their homicide is low. But yeah, if you specifically tailor the criteria so that the US is the only nation that fits the criteria, then you'll find that the US stands out quite a bit in that narrow field.
The narrow field, as I explained before is simply the advanced western nations. I have applied no bias. The lists published on Wiki are ones I go through, and pick out the European, Australasian, and North American countries that can be compared to each other for wealth and for social and technological development.
Switzerland is certainly an interesting case. it is second on the list for firearm ownership. USA has 89% gun ownership and Switzerland 46% - just over half the American figure. Latest figure for homicide rate is USA 4.2 and Switzerland 0.7. Does this mean the Swiss are more civilised, or that they have fewer hand guns? I will need to investigate further.
For your information, I have 19 nations which I call advanced western. They are :
USA, Switzerland,Finland, Sweden, Norway, Netherlands,France, Canada, Austria, Germany, Iceland, New Zealand, Australia, Greece, Belgium, Denmark, Italy, Spain, and the UK.
I feel these are appropriate comparisons for the social impact of gun ownership, rather than Russia, Swaziland, Uganda, China, Myanmar etc.
Edit : I checked on Switzerland. They are different from the USA in that they have fewer hand guns, and it is totally forbidden to carry a hand gun in public unless the person has a special license which is given only to people who can justify that in terms of their vocation. ie. police or security personnel. So their lower homicide rate would appear to be due to the fact that there are no people out in public with those lethal hand guns, except a few specialists on duty.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.