Petraeus Condemns Church's Plan to Burn Quarans

[Brian Peacock]

OK. So you can't justify your claims with evidence because their isn't enough evidence to convince people. So what convinced you?

[pErvinalia]

[Cunt]

OK. So you can't justify your claims with evidence because their isn't enough evidence to convince people. So what convinced you?

No, I have evidence enough for me. If you knew more, there might be evidence enough for you. I couldn't possibly know.

When I mention something like Project Veritas exposing the cover-up by ABC, it is part of the evidence. Haven't heard anyone say whether they had seen it, or if it was convincing evidence in any way. I also mentioned the Weinstein podcast where he nervously told his story of meeting Epstein for work. Again, don't know if that is in any kind of 'evidence' for you, unless you comment on it.

There were customers. I don't mind if you think I don't have enough 'evidence' . I think the more outlandish claim is that there were NOT any customers who's identity is protected by court order.

[Cunt]

Ya, most often I skip your vids, in favour of your own thoughts or opinions.

[Brian Peacock]

OK. So you can't justify your claims with evidence because their isn't enough evidence to convince people. So what convinced you?

No, I have evidence enough for me. If you knew more, there might be evidence enough for you. I couldn't possibly know.

Your short term memory isn't great is it? I know you're convinced, which is why I asked you what in particular convinced you?

When I mention something like Project Veritas exposing the cover-up by ABC, it is part of the evidence. Haven't heard anyone say whether they had seen it, or if it was convincing evidence in any way. I also mentioned the Weinstein podcast where he nervously told his story of meeting Epstein for work. Again, don't know if that is in any kind of 'evidence' for you, unless you comment on it.

OK. So it's not so much about the amount of evidence there is, but whether it fits in with what you've come across already.

There were customers. I don't mind if you think I don't have enough 'evidence' . I think the more outlandish claim is that there were NOT any customers who's identity is protected by court order.

You don't have anything to prove to me. I'm not your employer or your dad. Asking you to give your reasons for saying 'X is true' isn't a challenge to your authority, or a challenge from authority. And it doesn't mean that your challenger automatically holds the opposite opinion, or morally disapproves of you - so perhaps you could stop reaction as if they do. Eh?

[rasetsu]

OK. So you can't justify your claims with evidence because their isn't enough evidence to convince people. So what convinced you?

No, I have evidence enough for me. If you knew more, there might be evidence enough for you. I couldn't possibly know.

When I mention something like Project Veritas exposing the cover-up by ABC, it is part of the evidence. Haven't heard anyone say whether they had seen it, or if it was convincing evidence in any way. I also mentioned the Weinstein podcast where he nervously told his story of meeting Epstein for work. Again, don't know if that is in any kind of 'evidence' for you, unless you comment on it.

There were customers. I don't mind if you think I don't have enough 'evidence' . I think the more outlandish claim is that there were NOT any customers who's identity is protected by court order.

Opinions are like assholes, everybody's got one. If you don't have good evidence, you're just another asshole.

[Cunt]

OK. So you can't justify your claims with evidence because their isn't enough evidence to convince people. So what convinced you?

No, I have evidence enough for me. If you knew more, there might be evidence enough for you. I couldn't possibly know.

When I mention something like Project Veritas exposing the cover-up by ABC, it is part of the evidence. Haven't heard anyone say whether they had seen it, or if it was convincing evidence in any way. I also mentioned the Weinstein podcast where he nervously told his story of meeting Epstein for work. Again, don't know if that is in any kind of 'evidence' for you, unless you comment on it.

There were customers. I don't mind if you think I don't have enough 'evidence' . I think the more outlandish claim is that there were NOT any customers who's identity is protected by court order.

Opinions are like assholes, everybody's got one. If you don't have good evidence, you're just another asshole.

You didn't comment on any of the evidence I shared. You didn't say what kind of evidence would be acceptable.

You haven't convinced me that you have anything relevant to add to this particular discussion.

But keep going. It makes you seem like you are winning.

[Cunt]

Ayaan Hirsi Ali Wrote an interesting piece about trans activists negative effects on the rights of women.

To be against militant trans activists’ gender ideology is not to be transphobic.

She's been stalwart in her criticism of rabid religionists before, so I know she's not naive about this stuff, but I hope she doesn't get 'Theo-d'

[rasetsu]

You haven't convinced me that you have anything relevant to add to this particular discussion.

Oh gnoes!