Remarkable projection from a "slack-jawed-goon". But I understand that envy & jealousy is driving you. Perhaps, as your username claims, you're just being a pain in the arse? Back to the point:L'Emmerdeur wrote:I've looked for a thread like this here, and failed to find it. If there is one, please merge.
Here's a good example of the ignorance of white supremacists:
"Alt-right commentator claims Romans weren't ethnically diverse, gets owned by actual historian"The slack-jawed goons of the 'alt-right' will be supplying plenty of material for this thread.
If you're going to pick a fight with someone over ancient Roman facts, arguing with a historian is probably not the best course of action.
Infowars editor at large and right-wing YouTuber Paul Joseph Watson recently tweeted an insinuation that Roman Britain wasn’t ethnically diverse.
A bit of a bizarre claim to make out of the blue, but the reason for his outage stemmed from a five-and-a-half minute BBC educational YouTube video on what life was like in Roman Britain.The video, aimed at supporting teachers, is suitable for 7 to 11 year-olds and details what life was like for a typical family during the Roman period.
- Thank God the BBC is portraying Roman Britain as ethnically diverse.
I mean, who cares about historical accuracy, right? pic.twitter.com/SqE83Pmf2h
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) July 25, 2017
The cartoon that accompanies the video features everything from gladiator battles, the purpose of Hadrian's wall and the religious make up of Roman society.
It also features a series of ethnically diverse characters, which is what appeared to anger the Infowars host, who implied that the BBC didn't care about 'historical accuracy'.
It was following these claims of historical inaccuracy that historian Mike Stuchbery stepped in.
In a series of hugely informative tweets, he described how Roman Britain was ethnically diverse “almost by design”.
He explains that Roman troops were drawn from other parts of the empire, and occupied Britain.
There are many people in various professions who are useless at their job. Especially those who don't even practice their claimed profession. One such is Mike Stuchbery... his knowledge of Roman Britain is appalling. And to challenge an intellectual, such as Paul Joseph Watson, is the height of stupidity. A stupidity that comes naturally to someone who can not comprehend an IQ much higher than his own.
A few true black or Negroid people were found in Roman armies, but generally as low paid hired mercenaries or forced slave combatants set at the front line as expendable pawns. How do I know this? Apart from the art evidence that does not show Ethiops in Roman & earlier Greek armies...in other words, they were invisible because they were derided... it is the fact that Northern Africans were a vassal subject peoples to Rome.
Throughout human history, in every culture, vassals have ALWAYS been seen & treated as inferior peoples. That is nothing new. They were inferior because they were conquered, they proved themselves inferior by losing, and thus of less worth.
The further North one went from the heart of the empire, the fewer unusual military men one encountered. In North Africa they would have been more common, similar to how black Africans served in lowly positions in the white South African regime 40 years ago.
In Britain, there would have been very few black people indeed, in the Roman army or elsewhere. And the handful would certainly not have been in respectable positions. And in addition none would have been allowed to have romantic relationships with white Romans or native English. The only place where such relationships were tolerated was in brothels where the novelty factor was sought for puerile titillation. But such places also had bestiality & pedophilia; that did not make the dogs, horses, and children respectable pillars of society.
So, in summary, a little thought will show you that far from showing up PJW, Mike Stuchbery has made a fool of himself, because he is a PC cart pushing ignoramus, a wishful thinking, naval gazing nincompoop zealot.