I'll give a report when I learn more from my sources, though I just know it has to do with that stupid Nazism, and I've spoken to Don about that in the past National Socialism is an alien anti-American political philosophy that has no place in this country
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
Sean Hayden wrote:That's pretty shallow Tyrannical.
How was that shallow? I thought it was pretty accurate.
I assume you want to talk about the different technological development of various peoples. I said your statement was shallow mostly because it doesn't appear to take into account other possible causes for the different histories besides superior races.
It also fails to acknowledge reasons less appealing to your own beliefs, and it doesn't allow people their own reasons. It's just a shallow statement about why you think some people come to "our countries".
Sean Hayden wrote:That's pretty shallow Tyrannical.
How was that shallow? I thought it was pretty accurate.
I assume you want to talk about the different technological development of various peoples. I said your statement was shallow mostly because it doesn't appear to take into account other possible causes for the different histories besides superior races.
It also fails to acknowledge reasons less appealing to your own beliefs, and it doesn't allow people their own reasons. It's just a shallow statement about why you think some people come to "our countries".
I happily entertain any factually based reason regardless of my current personal beliefs. Call it rational skepticism if you will
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:If I was god for the day, you'd wake up black, Tyr.
Race is far more than skin deep.
Some women have sworn I must have some black genetics, mainly from the waste down to about mid-way down my thigh...
Are you saying women think your ancestors engaged in bestiality with farm animals? Doesn't sound so "cool" when you put it into perspective, does it?
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:If I was god for the day, you'd wake up black, Tyr.
Race is far more than skin deep.
Some women have sworn I must have some black genetics, mainly from the waste down to about mid-way down my thigh...
Are you saying women think your ancestors engaged in bestiality with farm animals? Doesn't sound so "cool" when you put it into perspective, does it?
What the fuck are you talking about Tyr?
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
“Advocating for white nationalism means that we are opposed to minority attempts to elevate themselves to a position equal to our own,” wrote Black
Minorities are free not to emigrate to the US just as Blacks are free to immigrate back to Africa. Couloreds come to our countries for one reason, Whites can build what they never can.
I'm pretty sure some minorities were imported to the U.S. to build things that whites couldn't on their own - the transcontinental railway being an example.
“Advocating for white nationalism means that we are opposed to minority attempts to elevate themselves to a position equal to our own,” wrote Black
Minorities are free not to emigrate to the US just as Blacks are free to immigrate back to Africa. Couloreds come to our countries for one reason, Whites can build what they never can.
I'm pretty sure some minorities were imported to the U.S. to build things that whites couldn't on their own - the transcontinental railway being an example.
Oh, just a cotton-pickin' minute...
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
“Advocating for white nationalism means that we are opposed to minority attempts to elevate themselves to a position equal to our own,” wrote Black
Minorities are free not to emigrate to the US just as Blacks are free to immigrate back to Africa. Couloreds come to our countries for one reason, Whites can build what they never can.
I'm pretty sure some minorities were imported to the U.S. to build things that whites couldn't on their own - the transcontinental railway being an example.
How possibly could "minorities" be imported to build things that Whites "could" not?
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
“Advocating for white nationalism means that we are opposed to minority attempts to elevate themselves to a position equal to our own,” wrote Black
Minorities are free not to emigrate to the US just as Blacks are free to immigrate back to Africa. Couloreds come to our countries for one reason, Whites can build what they never can.
I'm pretty sure some minorities were imported to the U.S. to build things that whites couldn't on their own - the transcontinental railway being an example.
Oh, just a cotton-pickin' minute...
You got a laugh put of me with that one
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows. I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak. When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:If I was god for the day, you'd wake up black, Tyr.
Race is far more than skin deep.
Some women have sworn I must have some black genetics, mainly from the waste down to about mid-way down my thigh...
Are you saying women think your ancestors engaged in bestiality with farm animals? Doesn't sound so "cool" when you put it into perspective, does it?
Are you implying that black people consort with farm animals? Or that black people are farm animals? Either way, you can be thoroughly sickening at times.
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return. Salman Rushdie You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic. House MD Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view. Sandy Denny This is the wrong forum for bluffing Paco Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish! Calilasseia I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants. Twoflower Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse Millefleur
I'm not implying anything, I'm clearly stating that blacks are obsolete farm machinery.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.