No Compromise - Being A Moderate is a Bad Thing

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: No Compromise - Being A Moderate is a Bad Thing

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sun May 20, 2012 11:07 pm

maiforpeace wrote:Too bad all the Tea party bothers to learn about is all the crap and none of the positive useful stuff that helps everyone, not just themselves.
Wouldn't be Tea Baggettes without the "me first, devil take the hindmost" attitude, now would they?
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: No Compromise - Being A Moderate is a Bad Thing

Post by Robert_S » Mon May 21, 2012 12:05 am

andrewclunn wrote:Yeah, out with the rhinos!
Either that "h" doesn't belong in there or someone's in danger of getting poached for teh horney horn!
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: No Compromise - Being A Moderate is a Bad Thing

Post by Robert_S » Mon May 21, 2012 12:13 am

An oldie, but apropos:

What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Thumpalumpacus
Posts: 1357
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:13 pm
About me: Texan by birth, musician by nature, writer by avocation, freethinker by inclination.
Contact:

Re: No Compromise - Being A Moderate is a Bad Thing

Post by Thumpalumpacus » Mon May 21, 2012 2:08 am

The inability to compromise will ruin this nation.

Left wing, right wing ... same goddamned turkey.
these are things we think we know
these are feelings we might even share
these are thoughts we hide from ourselves
these are secrets we cannot lay bare.

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: No Compromise - Being A Moderate is a Bad Thing

Post by maiforpeace » Mon May 21, 2012 3:41 am

Thumpalumpacus wrote:The inability to compromise will ruin this nation.

Left wing, right wing ... same goddamned turkey.
Gobble, gobble is exactly what is happening too.
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39291
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: No Compromise - Being A Moderate is a Bad Thing

Post by Animavore » Mon May 21, 2012 11:19 am

I never did understand this seeming yawning chasm between left and right (through the filter of the media at least) in America. In Ireland the parties are all so close around the centre I have to look up who's left and who's right on Wiki.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
Drewish
I'm with stupid /\
Posts: 4705
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:31 pm
Contact:

Re: No Compromise - Being A Moderate is a Bad Thing

Post by Drewish » Mon May 21, 2012 12:00 pm

Robert_S wrote:
andrewclunn wrote:Yeah, out with the rhinos!
Either that "h" doesn't belong in there or someone's in danger of getting poached for teh horney horn!
Those cocky horned mammals. They're endangered for a reason, bastards! :lay:
Nobody expects me...

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: No Compromise - Being A Moderate is a Bad Thing

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Mon May 21, 2012 12:14 pm

Animavore wrote:I never did understand this seeming yawning chasm between left and right (through the filter of the media at least) in America. In Ireland the parties are all so close around the centre I have to look up who's left and who's right on Wiki.
Remember, we fought a civil war over things like this. We're rather bloody-minded that way, no figuring it out. We even resist multi-party systems because the two-party system makes it easier to figure out who to hate.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: No Compromise - Being A Moderate is a Bad Thing

Post by Robert_S » Mon May 21, 2012 12:47 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
Animavore wrote:I never did understand this seeming yawning chasm between left and right (through the filter of the media at least) in America. In Ireland the parties are all so close around the centre I have to look up who's left and who's right on Wiki.
Remember, we fought a civil war over things like this. We're rather bloody-minded that way, no figuring it out. We even resist multi-party systems because the two-party system makes it easier to figure out who to hate.
Now they're hating the ones who don't hate the baddies hard enough.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: No Compromise - Being A Moderate is a Bad Thing

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Mon May 21, 2012 12:52 pm

Robert_S wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Animavore wrote:I never did understand this seeming yawning chasm between left and right (through the filter of the media at least) in America. In Ireland the parties are all so close around the centre I have to look up who's left and who's right on Wiki.
Remember, we fought a civil war over things like this. We're rather bloody-minded that way, no figuring it out. We even resist multi-party systems because the two-party system makes it easier to figure out who to hate.
Now they're hating the ones who don't hate the baddies hard enough.
Yep, but we're getting more and more of the fringe and less of the center. I think the Internet is a force-multiplier for insanity.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: No Compromise - Being A Moderate is a Bad Thing

Post by Hermit » Mon May 21, 2012 1:49 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:we're getting more and more of the fringe and less of the center.
Don't know about that. When was it the last time that a political force with real clout maintained that the private ownership of the means of production is a crime and set about actually doing something to fix it? At the other end, has there ever been a party with enough electoral appeal to enact the principle of "taxation is theft"? Given the breadth of this political spectrum, the ideological differences between the Demogocical and the Repugnicant parties is minuscule. If anything can be said about political drifts, it is that both have been slowly sliding to the right, just like two-party systems in other countries have.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: No Compromise - Being A Moderate is a Bad Thing

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Mon May 21, 2012 3:38 pm

Hermit wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:we're getting more and more of the fringe and less of the center.
Don't know about that. When was it the last time that a political force with real clout maintained that the private ownership of the means of production is a crime and set about actually doing something to fix it? At the other end, has there ever been a party with enough electoral appeal to enact the principle of "taxation is theft"? Given the breadth of this political spectrum, the ideological differences between the Demogocical and the Repugnicant parties is minuscule. If anything can be said about political drifts, it is that both have been slowly sliding to the right, just like two-party systems in other countries have.
I meant "on the Internet".
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: No Compromise - Being A Moderate is a Bad Thing

Post by Ian » Mon May 21, 2012 3:54 pm

Thumpalumpacus wrote:The inability to compromise will ruin this nation.

Left wing, right wing ... same goddamned turkey.
There are plenty of turkeys to be found in DC, but this sort of statement might imply an inherently equal balance on both sides in terms of their unwillingness to compromise. That would be incorrect; it's known as false balance. Truth is, while both parties have been drifting apart for more than 30 years, but the Republicans are the ones for whom moderation and compromising is now anathema, distinctly more so than it is for the Democrats.

Nevermind my opinion though, read some quantifiable data on the subject:
http://www.voteview.com/political_polarization.asp
http://www.voteview.com/
http://www.voteview.com/polarizedamerica.asp

User avatar
Thumpalumpacus
Posts: 1357
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:13 pm
About me: Texan by birth, musician by nature, writer by avocation, freethinker by inclination.
Contact:

Re: No Compromise - Being A Moderate is a Bad Thing

Post by Thumpalumpacus » Mon May 21, 2012 5:01 pm

Ian wrote:
Thumpalumpacus wrote:The inability to compromise will ruin this nation.

Left wing, right wing ... same goddamned turkey.
There are plenty of turkeys to be found in DC, but this sort of statement might imply an inherently equal balance on both sides in terms of their unwillingness to compromise. That would be incorrect; it's known as false balance. Truth is, while both parties have been drifting apart for more than 30 years, but the Republicans are the ones for whom moderation and compromising is now anathema, distinctly more so than it is for the Democrats.

Nevermind my opinion though, read some quantifiable data on the subject:
http://www.voteview.com/political_polarization.asp
http://www.voteview.com/
http://www.voteview.com/polarizedamerica.asp
Those first two links show that polarization is increasing, but not that one party owns a greater share of intolerance for the other.

The last seems to indicate that among the wealthy, a Libertarian leaning is associated with less tolerance for other views, althoughit doesn't strike me as definitive. I also notice that while the abstract takes pains to address the position on tolerance held by the upperclass, it is silent about that of the lower class. The information about party means is interesting, but when looked at from a historical perspective, the differences seem to blur.

Do you have any data more directly pertinent?

Looking at it from a layman's view, the greater body of the polity seems equally intolerant to me. If we take "willingness to march publicly in support of one's views" as a measure of intensity of feeling, the two sides seem to be fairly drawn: Tea Party rallies on one side, Occupy rallies on the other. There seems to be more violence accompanying the demonstrations of the left ... which strikes me as a form of intolerance, too.

Those are some interesting links, but not really conclusive, given that my complaint was not where they lie on the political spectrum, but how willing they are to compromise in order to achieve a functional government. You seem to be confusing where they lie in their views with their willingness to bend on those views ... and those are two disparate things. I know to-the-bone racists who work with minorities daily.
these are things we think we know
these are feelings we might even share
these are thoughts we hide from ourselves
these are secrets we cannot lay bare.

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: No Compromise - Being A Moderate is a Bad Thing

Post by maiforpeace » Mon May 21, 2012 5:47 pm

Ian wrote:
Thumpalumpacus wrote:The inability to compromise will ruin this nation.

Left wing, right wing ... same goddamned turkey.
There are plenty of turkeys to be found in DC, but this sort of statement might imply an inherently equal balance on both sides in terms of their unwillingness to compromise. That would be incorrect; it's known as false balance. Truth is, while both parties have been drifting apart for more than 30 years, but the Republicans are the ones for whom moderation and compromising is now anathema, distinctly more so than it is for the Democrats.

Nevermind my opinion though, read some quantifiable data on the subject:
http://www.voteview.com/political_polarization.asp
http://www.voteview.com/
http://www.voteview.com/polarizedamerica.asp
Even if the evidence shows that Democrats are unwilling to compromise in lesser degree than Republicans, those that choose this route are basically throwing in the towel and saying, if you can't beat them, join them. Or, that is a position that is respectable in Washington.
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests