Merica does it right!

[Coito ergo sum]

Will you two please put a sock in it?! I don't care who started it - I want no more fighting.


(These are, obviously, the same words I use on my kids on a near daily basis.)

You're not my dad!

Well, I'll accept some discipline from you, Bella... will there be spankings? Or, wankings?

[Gawdzilla Sama]

[Kristie]

I was just about to post this one!

[Gawdzilla Sama]

I was just about to post this one!

[Jason]

I think he was saying that with the soul music intro to his speech.

[camoguard]

I will continue to bankrupt America by voting to sell to China unless you give me one million litres of vodka.

[Robert_S]

As Chuck Norris predicted, Obama got re-elected so we now enter a thousand four more years of darkness blackness.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

I hope Chuck hemorrhages.

[Ian]

546857_498373330197089_1195815228_n.jpg (26.69 KiB) Viewed 273 times

Romney Rewatches First Presidential Debate Alone In Living Room: http://onion.com/T5dCVO

[Gawdzilla Sama]

62% is a squeaker?

[Gerald McGrew]

546857_498373330197089_1195815228_n.jpg

Romney Rewatches First Presidential Debate Alone In Living Room: http://onion.com/T5dCVO

Swear to FSM...if I see anyone cite Dick Morris as an authority ever again, I'm going to slap them in the face.

[Gerald McGrew]

Love this quote:

Here's why political prediction is morally inferior to sports-line wagering or other kinds of normal betting: In pundit-world, the losers never have to pay off. You can assert with blowhard certitude that this or that candidate looks strong, this or that voting bloc is going to turn out, this or that strategy will be effective. If you're right, you play up that fact. If you're wrong, no one seems to notice or care. In Vegas, you have to pay up.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc ... ts/264578/

[mistermack]

I've been wondering why the Republicans self-harm, by banging on about god and abortion and stuff.
After all, they simply cannot lose in their banker states, they are just preaching to the converted.
You would think that they would keep quiet, and try harder to con the voters in the swing states.

But I suppose, on an individual basis, they are competing for position in their own back yards. So to get on the ladder and stay there, they are constantly forced to charm the right wing with the hardest-right rhetoric.
So in effect, it's the right-wing nutters who lost it for Mitt.

That gives me a warm feeling inside.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

I've been wondering why the Republicans self-harm, by banging on about god and abortion and stuff.
After all, they simply cannot lose in their banker states, they are just preaching to the converted.
You would think that they would keep quiet, and try harder to con the voters in the swing states.

Moderate Republicans don't do that. Just the Far Right/Fundamentalists. Therein lies the problem. You have a bifurcation of the party that will, I think, eventually split it into two different parties.

But I suppose, on an individual basis, they are competing for position in their own back yards. So to get on the ladder and stay there, they are constantly forced to charm the right wing with the hardest-right rhetoric.
So in effect, it's the right-wing nutters who lost it for Mitt.

That gives me a warm feeling inside.

Ed Zachery.

[amused]

Some of the punditocracy are predicting a Tea Party sweep of Republican positions in the mid-terms and full on Tea for 2016. At which point their loss should be devastating and allow the normal Republicans a chance to regroup.