I read somewhere that badgers break out in non-sequiturs when fact checked.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 12:37 amOh look over there... an angry badger with a loaded non-sequitur.![]()

I read somewhere that badgers break out in non-sequiturs when fact checked.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 12:37 amOh look over there... an angry badger with a loaded non-sequitur.![]()
He was though. He hid in the basement, and picked the least popular candidate for his running mate. Then called a lid on his campaign, while a compliant media did stuff like hiding the damaging stories for him.BarnettNewman wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:01 amWhat’s embarrassing was that he was the better candidate.Cunt wrote:Did he really just take on the 'build that wall' thing from his predecessor?
He really is a clown, holy shit. It must be embarrassing to have him be the 'good candidate'.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Lol. The media didn't hide those stories. We all know about them and what the details are. It just turned that there wasn't very much to those stories. Perhaps it's comforting to think that a significant majority of the electorate voted for a less than perfect candidate because they were ignorant or unwilling to accept certain 'truths' about him - it means one doesn't have to consider that voters actually made a deliberate choice for one guy over another. It also speaks to the wider idea that votes for Biden are somehow less legitimate than votes for Trump, which is the basic narrative that inspired the 'stop the steal' movement.Cunt wrote:He was though. He hid in the basement, and picked the least popular candidate for his running mate. Then called a lid on his campaign, while a compliant media did stuff like hiding the damaging stories for him.BarnettNewman wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:01 amWhat’s embarrassing was that he was the better candidate.Cunt wrote:Did he really just take on the 'build that wall' thing from his predecessor?
He really is a clown, holy shit. It must be embarrassing to have him be the 'good candidate'.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The voters have a strong opinion on the guy the media hated, and a strong acceptance of the one the media preferred.
Maybe I should just trust the incoherent Trump hate though. He's been banned from all the platforms, by all the wealthiest social media leaders, so it must be legit.
Yeah, the hated guy sure was popular in his clan. They keep giving and giving to him. I think they are still paying to him monthly. What were the faults of this basement guy? He kept sniffing hair? His dog bit a journalist?Cunt wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:08 amHe was though. He hid in the basement, and picked the least popular candidate for his running mate. Then called a lid on his campaign, while a compliant media did stuff like hiding the damaging stories for him.BarnettNewman wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:01 amWhat’s embarrassing was that he was the better candidate.Cunt wrote:Did he really just take on the 'build that wall' thing from his predecessor?
He really is a clown, holy shit. It must be embarrassing to have him be the 'good candidate'.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The voters have a strong opinion on the guy the media hated, and a strong acceptance of the one the media preferred.
Maybe I should just trust the incoherent Trump hate though. He's been banned from all the platforms, by all the wealthiest social media leaders, so it must be legit.
He is the one you guys all wanted. You guys, Twitter, grindr, reddit, ABC, NBC, CBC, BBC and all the largest beneficiaries of the Amazon lockdowns.
I see this is your latest Tourettes compulsion. What's it supposed to mean?
He just repeats the talking points. It's probably asking too much for him to explain them.pErvinalia wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:45 pmI see this is your latest Tourettes compulsion. What's it supposed to mean?![]()
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests