As one of the people whom he would like to see dead I have to disagree.Pappa wrote:I don't think it's at all accurate to describe Gawd as having "a pathological hatred of human beings".Gawdzilla wrote:It is accurate, no?Pappa wrote:Is that really necessary?Ian wrote:Somebody with a pathological hatred of human beings will never understand the difference.
Do Governments Represent Their People?
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Do Governments Represent Their People?
- Robert_S
- Cookie Monster
- Posts: 13416
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
- About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
Re: Do Governments Represent Their People?
Hatred? maybe, but i don't see that as necessarily being Gawd's primary motivator. But then, I can't say anything really about Gawd except his political views.
I have no idea about his musical or aesthetic tastes. I've no idea what he wants to replace US/Israeli corporate capitalism. I've no idea his views on cheese, bacon custard or celery. Does he like action films or chick flicks? I should at least like to hear from him that there's more to him than his politics even if he never shares the details with us.
I have no idea about his musical or aesthetic tastes. I've no idea what he wants to replace US/Israeli corporate capitalism. I've no idea his views on cheese, bacon custard or celery. Does he like action films or chick flicks? I should at least like to hear from him that there's more to him than his politics even if he never shares the details with us.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Do Governments Represent Their People?
Words ought to mean things, and not be flung about where they don't belong.Gawd wrote:The negative of a negative is a positive. Or if you prefer, I'm against American & Israeli systematic war mongering & apartheid. That's a positive expression.Robert_S wrote:Yes, but that is still pro-anti-US/Israel.Gawd wrote:I've posted in favor of the downfall of the US & Israel.
Essentially, it's a position against something.
Apartheid: any system or practice that separates people according to race, caste, etc.
That's not the US practice, and neither is it the Israeli practice. 20% of Israel is Arab-Muslim, and they are not segregated or separated at all.
And, to suggest that the US and Israel mongers wars is ridiculous. Israel hasn't participated in wars, except against those who attack it, and the odd bombing of a nuclear facility in Iraq. The US isn't mongering any wars - the Afghan conflict was brought on by a direct attack on the US from Al Qaeta who was harbored there. Even if one disagrees with the Iraq War, it's one war, certainly not to be in and of itself considered "mongering." Plenty of other wars have been started all around the world in the last 10-20 years, and not by the United States.
Re: Do Governments Represent Their People?
Ditto.Gawdzilla wrote:As one of the people whom he would like to see dead I have to disagree.Pappa wrote:I don't think it's at all accurate to describe Gawd as having "a pathological hatred of human beings".Gawdzilla wrote:It is accurate, no?Pappa wrote:Is that really necessary?Ian wrote:Somebody with a pathological hatred of human beings will never understand the difference.
I call it as I see it, and I think he's a borderline sociopath at least. Politics is merely his excuse for focusing the hatred he has onto specific groups of people.
Gawd calls it as he sees it. All Israelis and Americans -regardless of their ideology, gender, class, race, age, education or musical preferences- deserve to be hated and attacked because of the country in which they live. If he read in the news that some lunatic blew himself and fifty other people up on a street in downtown Washington, he'd praise the guy as a freedom fighter, nevermind if my wife and kids, or anyone else's, were walking past the bomber when it happened. He's got his cherished list of people he hates (and posts about nothing else), grouped together by nationalism above all other factors, or perhaps by no other factors at all. And if people in those countries suffer or die, then they've earned it; their government is a reflection of them, after all.
Psychologically, he should seek help. Politically, he ought to go back to 1914 where he belongs.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Do Governments Represent Their People?
He is all inclusive, hating people who are beaten down by the system simply because they're Americans. Helpless, hopeless Americans, but because they're Americans, and for no other reason, they should be killed. This is not the attitude of a healthy mind.
- Warren Dew
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
- Location: Somerville, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Do Governments Represent Their People?
No system of apartheid is perfect. The U.S. system of Indian reservations qualifies as apartheid, as does the Israeli treatment of most of the west bank territories.Coito ergo sum wrote:Apartheid: any system or practice that separates people according to race, caste, etc.
That's not the US practice, and neither is it the Israeli practice. 20% of Israel is Arab-Muslim, and they are not segregated or separated at all.
Re: Do Governments Represent Their People?
Indeed. And I'm all for ending that apartheid in America. Repudiate all treaties, turn over all reservation lands to the tribes and dismantle the BIA, eliminate all notions of "domestic dependent nation" sovereign status, pay off the debt we owe them over "management" of their natural resources (which is being done as we speak) and remove all "sovereign status" perks they enjoy on their reservations and subject them to all of the same laws and regulations that every other American citizen enjoys and stop treating them like children.Warren Dew wrote:No system of apartheid is perfect. The U.S. system of Indian reservations qualifies as apartheid, as does the Israeli treatment of most of the west bank territories.Coito ergo sum wrote:Apartheid: any system or practice that separates people according to race, caste, etc.
That's not the US practice, and neither is it the Israeli practice. 20% of Israel is Arab-Muslim, and they are not segregated or separated at all.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests