Peter Tatchell fail

User avatar
Exi5tentialist
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 4:55 pm
Location: Coalville
Contact:

Re: Peter Tatchell fail

Post by Exi5tentialist » Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:53 pm

Robert_S wrote:The "Far Right" should have been a clue.
Problem is, as you know, the far right (and others) generally use the word 'islamists' as a generalised attack on anything to do with muslims. So Tatchell goes to a march in defence of muslims and holds up a placard which is using the same slogans the EDL and their like use. It's unnecessarily confusing. But there again, that's what makes Tatchell such a good self-publicist, albeit at great risk to himself, because everybody ends up talking about his contradictions.

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Peter Tatchell fail

Post by Robert_S » Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:06 pm

Exi5tentialist wrote:
Robert_S wrote:The "Far Right" should have been a clue.
Problem is, as you know, the far right (and others) generally use the word 'islamists' as a generalised attack on anything to do with muslims. So Tatchell goes to a march in defence of muslims and holds up a placard which is using the same slogans the EDL and their like use. It's unnecessarily confusing. But there again, that's what makes Tatchell such a good self-publicist, albeit at great risk to himself, because everybody ends up talking about his contradictions.
Actually, I don't know very much about Islam or the EDL type of right wingers in the UK.


How do the Jews and the EDL get on BTW?
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Azathoth
blind idiot god
blind idiot god
Posts: 9418
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Peter Tatchell fail

Post by Azathoth » Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:20 pm

Nobody really gives a shit about jews in the UK. They are a very small minority and don't have anything like the political clout they do in the US
Outside the ordered universe is that amorphous blight of nethermost confusion which blasphemes and bubbles at the center of all infinity—the boundless daemon sultan Azathoth, whose name no lips dare speak aloud, and who gnaws hungrily in inconceivable, unlighted chambers beyond time and space amidst the muffled, maddening beating of vile drums and the thin monotonous whine of accursed flutes.

Code: Select all

// Replaces with spaces the braces in cases where braces in places cause stasis 
   $str = str_replace(array("\{","\}")," ",$str);

User avatar
Exi5tentialist
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 4:55 pm
Location: Coalville
Contact:

Re: Peter Tatchell fail

Post by Exi5tentialist » Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:26 pm

My impression is that the EDL have latched onto a supposed alternative to racism because they know how badly racism plays in this country. Therefore they dress their stall with slightly subtler visions of western supremacism. Their targets are those who who they see as undermining the 'west'. The foundations of the west in the eyes of the EDL include the nation state (England, in our case) and all that the western nation state has achieved. They would probably therefore make a show of welcoming jews, gay men, bisexuals and even people of asian or african/carribean racial origin if they speak in the relevant local english accent and have been properly westernised.

The main ostensible target for the EDL is non-westerners and those who do not 'integrate' into the west. Therefore they would latch onto all the same anti-muslim hate speech that Dawkins, Hitchens etc are adept in. They might even welcome (again, ostensibly) some muslims who express 'anti-islamist' views.

I keep using the words ostensibly, because it's all for show really. Beneath the wafer-thin front, the EDL are the same racist thugs as the BNP, and I wouldn't rate any jew's chances going anywhere near them.

Lozzer
First Only Gay
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Peter Tatchell fail

Post by Lozzer » Thu Sep 08, 2011 10:08 am

Robert_S wrote:
Exi5tentialist wrote:
Robert_S wrote:The "Far Right" should have been a clue.
Problem is, as you know, the far right (and others) generally use the word 'islamists' as a generalised attack on anything to do with muslims. So Tatchell goes to a march in defence of muslims and holds up a placard which is using the same slogans the EDL and their like use. It's unnecessarily confusing. But there again, that's what makes Tatchell such a good self-publicist, albeit at great risk to himself, because everybody ends up talking about his contradictions.
Actually, I don't know very much about Islam or the EDL type of right wingers in the UK.


How do the Jews and the EDL get on BTW?
Like a house on fire. The EDL have a penchant for supporting Israel, and carry Israeli national flags amongst Union Jacks. They have their own Jewish division, too.
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee

User avatar
Atheist-Lite
Formerly known as Crumple
Posts: 8745
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:35 pm
About me: You need a jetpack? Here, take mine. I don't need a jetpack this far away.
Location: In the Galactic Hub, Yes That One !!!
Contact:

Re: Peter Tatchell fail

Post by Atheist-Lite » Thu Sep 08, 2011 10:20 am

Lozzer wrote:
Robert_S wrote:
Exi5tentialist wrote:
Robert_S wrote:The "Far Right" should have been a clue.
Problem is, as you know, the far right (and others) generally use the word 'islamists' as a generalised attack on anything to do with muslims. So Tatchell goes to a march in defence of muslims and holds up a placard which is using the same slogans the EDL and their like use. It's unnecessarily confusing. But there again, that's what makes Tatchell such a good self-publicist, albeit at great risk to himself, because everybody ends up talking about his contradictions.
Actually, I don't know very much about Islam or the EDL type of right wingers in the UK.


How do the Jews and the EDL get on BTW?
Like a house on fire. The EDL have a penchant for supporting Israel, and carry Israeli national flags amongst Union Jacks. They have their own Jewish division, too.
:nono:
nxnxm,cm,m,fvmf,vndfnm,nm,f,dvm,v v vmfm,vvm,d,dd vv sm,mvd,fmf,fn ,v fvfm,

User avatar
HomerJay
Posts: 2512
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:06 pm
Location: England
Contact:

Re: Peter Tatchell fail

Post by HomerJay » Thu Sep 08, 2011 4:48 pm

Exi5tentialist wrote:It really didn't help that Tatchell's placard included the phrase, 'Stop far right Islamists'. The term 'islamist' just confuses the issue completely, 'islamism' means different things to different people, its inclusion makes it very difficult to know whether it was the gay bit or the 'anti-islamist' bit of his placard people were objecting to.
If you read the full account Tatchell makes it clear that the muslims were agreeing with the first but not the gayness thing.

The placards were double sided, one side islamist the other gayness, it was only when the gayness was displayed that things got nasty.

User avatar
Exi5tentialist
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 4:55 pm
Location: Coalville
Contact:

Re: Peter Tatchell fail

Post by Exi5tentialist » Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:18 pm

HomerJay wrote:
Exi5tentialist wrote:It really didn't help that Tatchell's placard included the phrase, 'Stop far right Islamists'. The term 'islamist' just confuses the issue completely, 'islamism' means different things to different people, its inclusion makes it very difficult to know whether it was the gay bit or the 'anti-islamist' bit of his placard people were objecting to.
If you read the full account Tatchell makes it clear that the muslims were agreeing with the first but not the gayness thing.

The placards were double sided, one side islamist the other gayness, it was only when the gayness was displayed that things got nasty.
Yeah but it's Tatchell's account (talking to the Pink Paper). He's not in the most objective position. If the placard had just been about Gays and Muslims in solidarity against the EDL then it would have made things a lot simpler, but introducing the slogan about far-right islamism thoroughly confuses the whole thing. If there are any reports other than Tatchell's I'd be happy to hear them.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests