JK Rowling weighs more than a duck. Burn her!

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: JK Rowling weighs more than a duck. Burn her!

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:36 pm

AshtonBlack wrote:Anything that get the kiddies reading instead of watching the goggle box is good by me...
You cannot deny the Potter series has done just that, even if only for 6 books (or what ever it is).
Seven books, eight movies, and the legendary "8th Harry Potter Book" thread at RDF. (R.I.P.)
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Chinaski
Mazel tov cocktail
Posts: 3043
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:33 am
About me: Barfly
Location: Aberdeen
Contact:

Re: JK Rowling weighs more than a duck. Burn her!

Post by Chinaski » Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:43 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:She doesn't deserve it anyway. Shoddy writer. Erect a statue to Bukowski instead.
What don't you like about her CHILDREN'S BOOKS?
They suck? Even for kids. I remember being bowled over by Redwall, but Harry Potter just made me giggle, and later sigh in annoyance.
Is there for honest poverty
That hangs his heid and a' that
The coward slave, we pass him by
We dare be puir for a' that.

Imagehttp://imagegen.last.fm/iTunesFIXED/rec ... mphony.gif[/img2]

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: JK Rowling weighs more than a duck. Burn her!

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:58 pm

FrigidSymphony wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:She doesn't deserve it anyway. Shoddy writer. Erect a statue to Bukowski instead.
What don't you like about her CHILDREN'S BOOKS?
They suck? Even for kids. I remember being bowled over by Redwall, but Harry Potter just made me giggle, and later sigh in annoyance.
Okay, that's your opinion.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: JK Rowling weighs more than a duck. Burn her!

Post by FBM » Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:02 pm

I'm all for getting kids into books, too, FS, and even fantasy books accomplish that. But I would try to keep my kids (if I had any) from getting permanently hooked on escapism, magical thinking, etc. Or to put it another way, I'd try to substitute curiosity for fantasy as they matured.

"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: JK Rowling weighs more than a duck. Burn her!

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:06 pm

FBM wrote:I'm all for getting kids into books, too, FS, and even fantasy books accomplish that. But I would try to keep my kids (if I had any) from getting permanently hooked on escapism, magical thinking, etc. Or to put it another way, I'd try to substitute curiosity for fantasy as they matured.
Very true. J.K. doesn't have the responsibility of raising any kids but her own. She can help us raise ours, but without guidance from us the kids are screwed by all the crap.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: JK Rowling weighs more than a duck. Burn her!

Post by FBM » Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:17 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
FBM wrote:I'm all for getting kids into books, too, FS, and even fantasy books accomplish that. But I would try to keep my kids (if I had any) from getting permanently hooked on escapism, magical thinking, etc. Or to put it another way, I'd try to substitute curiosity for fantasy as they matured.
Very true. J.K. doesn't have the responsibility of raising any kids but her own. She can help us raise ours, but without guidance from us the kids are screwed by all the crap.
Well said! :td:
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
Deep Sea Isopod
Bathynomus giganteus
Posts: 7806
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
Location: Gods blind spot.
Contact:

Re: JK Rowling weighs more than a duck. Burn her!

Post by Deep Sea Isopod » Thu Oct 01, 2009 12:18 pm

tattuchu wrote:What is the criteria by which these awards are, um, awarded? I'm not sure Rowling deserves it because, while I enjoy them immensely, I wouldn't exactly call the Harry Potter series great literature. As for the books "promoting sorcery," that's a absolute bullshit reason not to award her the, um, award. Do these fucktards actually believe witchcraft and sorcery are real?! Are we still living in the fucking Dark Ages?! :lay:
Well they believe in giant sky fairies and magic tricks. :?
I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous Image

Image

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: JK Rowling weighs more than a duck. Burn her!

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Thu Oct 01, 2009 12:29 pm

Deep Sea Isopod wrote:
tattuchu wrote:What is the criteria by which these awards are, um, awarded? I'm not sure Rowling deserves it because, while I enjoy them immensely, I wouldn't exactly call the Harry Potter series great literature. As for the books "promoting sorcery," that's a absolute bullshit reason not to award her the, um, award. Do these fucktards actually believe witchcraft and sorcery are real?! Are we still living in the fucking Dark Ages?! :lay:
Well they believe in giant sky fairies and magic tricks. :?
Ever see kids shows these days?
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Deep Sea Isopod
Bathynomus giganteus
Posts: 7806
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
Location: Gods blind spot.
Contact:

Re: JK Rowling weighs more than a duck. Burn her!

Post by Deep Sea Isopod » Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:52 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
Deep Sea Isopod wrote:
tattuchu wrote:What is the criteria by which these awards are, um, awarded? I'm not sure Rowling deserves it because, while I enjoy them immensely, I wouldn't exactly call the Harry Potter series great literature. As for the books "promoting sorcery," that's a absolute bullshit reason not to award her the, um, award. Do these fucktards actually believe witchcraft and sorcery are real?! Are we still living in the fucking Dark Ages?! :lay:
Well they believe in giant sky fairies and magic tricks. :?
Ever see kids shows these days?

Spongebob Squarepants!!! :toot:
I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous Image

Image

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: JK Rowling weighs more than a duck. Burn her!

Post by Pappa » Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:55 pm

Deep Sea Isopod wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Deep Sea Isopod wrote:
tattuchu wrote:What is the criteria by which these awards are, um, awarded? I'm not sure Rowling deserves it because, while I enjoy them immensely, I wouldn't exactly call the Harry Potter series great literature. As for the books "promoting sorcery," that's a absolute bullshit reason not to award her the, um, award. Do these fucktards actually believe witchcraft and sorcery are real?! Are we still living in the fucking Dark Ages?! :lay:
Well they believe in giant sky fairies and magic tricks. :?
Ever see kids shows these days?

Spongebob Squarepants!!! :toot:
Spongebob is awesome. :biggrin:
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests