
Can this man do no wrong?
- FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach" - Contact:
Re: Can this man do no wrong?
I like it! The Raelians say they have a spaceship, don't they? Let's see if we can buy, borrow or steal theirs, grab Obama and a few pounds of cheese each and go! 

"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
Re: Can this man do no wrong?
yeehaw! We shall not forget the Tapatio sauce, cuz you know them dang people out in space aint gonna have none. 

Her hobbies include perspicacity and building models of the soul in lego.
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Can this man do no wrong?
Agreed. All I am saying is that the resolution is not really about disarmament. It is about the proliferation of nuclear weapons, and I approve. Stopping proliferation is the next best thing to disarmament. Come to think of it, a good case can be made that nuclear armaments have actually contributed to the preservation of peace. "Mutually assured destruction" (also known as the aptly ironic acronym "MAD") may well be the primary reason why the cold war between the USA and the Soviet Union has not developed into a shooting war. We got proxy wars instead (Korea, Vietnam, etc).Rumertron wrote:If they don't one day someone will use them. If it is relatively limited that will end the madness.Seraph wrote:Wow. I say WOW! Does this mean Israel, Pakistan, and India will dismantle and junk their nuclear warheads? And Russia, the USA, China, France and the UK will do likewise? Uhm...The UN Security Council has unanimously adopted a resolution calling for nuclear disarmament, in a session chaired by US President Barack Obama.
I think the key phrase is this:That will help justify bombing the living daylights out of Iran and North Korea when the opportunity arises.The resolution calls for further efforts to stop the spread of nuclear arms
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Re: Can this man do no wrong?
I hope you aren't recommending it as a strategy! I grew up in the Cold War era and the fear of imminent global destruction was pretty constant for a lot of us. I was 10 or 11 during the Cuban missile crisis and we did literally believe we were about to be vaporised. It left a sense of dread in the pit of my stomach which returned whenever one of the proxy wars (and there were many) flared up in one part of the world or another.Seraph wrote: Agreed. All I am saying is that the resolution is not really about disarmament. It is about the proliferation of nuclear weapons, and I approve. Stopping proliferation is the next best thing to disarmament. Come to think of it, a good case can be made that nuclear armaments have actually contributed to the preservation of peace. "Mutually assured destruction" (also known as the aptly ironic acronym "MAD") may well be the primary reason why the cold war between the USA and the Soviet Union has not developed into a shooting war. We got proxy wars instead (Korea, Vietnam, etc).
The present situation is probably less stable, but perceptually, rightly or wrongly I don't ever feel that fear any more.
Re: Can this man do no wrong?




Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
- FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach" - Contact:
Re: Can this man do no wrong?
They haven't the last few times I've been!Dasein wrote:yeehaw! We shall not forget the Tapatio sauce, cuz you know them dang people out in space aint gonna have none.

"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Can this man do no wrong?
I was almost ten when that crisis occurred and keenly aware of it. The atmosphere throughout Europe was incredibly oppressive. It was mandatory to include atom bomb shelters in new housing in Switzerland. Likewise, a huge underground car park in our city was designed to double as a shelter as well. There were emergency drills at school, and of course Dr. Strangelove's take on the brittleness of peace did nothing for ease of mind. In fact, the situation was so worrisome to my parents that they decided to get as far away from the focus of the conflict as possible, which they did by migrating to Australia. MAD is about as appropriate an acronym as acronyms can get.Rumertron wrote:I hope you aren't recommending it as a strategy! I grew up in the Cold War era and the fear of imminent global destruction was pretty constant for a lot of us. I was 10 or 11 during the Cuban missile crisis and we did literally believe we were about to be vaporised. It left a sense of dread in the pit of my stomach which returned whenever one of the proxy wars (and there were many) flared up in one part of the world or another.Seraph wrote: Agreed. All I am saying is that the resolution is not really about disarmament. It is about the proliferation of nuclear weapons, and I approve. Stopping proliferation is the next best thing to disarmament. Come to think of it, a good case can be made that nuclear armaments have actually contributed to the preservation of peace. "Mutually assured destruction" (also known as the aptly ironic acronym "MAD") may well be the primary reason why the cold war between the USA and the Soviet Union has not developed into a shooting war. We got proxy wars instead (Korea, Vietnam, etc).
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
Re: Can this man do no wrong?
Personally I think MAD coming to fruiting is the perfect resolution. The second best is disarmament.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 14 guests