The US Supreme Court

Post Reply
User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 73481
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by JimC » Wed Mar 20, 2024 7:10 pm

Duelling courts...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 48529
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by Tero » Tue Mar 26, 2024 1:27 am

US Supreme soon to ban abortion pill.
Alito
http://karireport.blogspot.com/2022/07/ ... n-our.html
will be explaining that supervision of abortion pills is not in our history and tradition. Best to ban them all. Throw in the birth control pill too.
https://karireport.blogspot.com/
International disaster, gonna be a blaster
Gonna rearrange our lives
International disaster, send for the master
Don't wait to see the white of his eyes
International disaster, international disaster
Price of silver droppin' so do yer Christmas shopping
Before you lose the chance to score (Pembroke)

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 48529
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by Tero » Tue Mar 26, 2024 12:23 pm

The likely outcome is that the Consitutuion in all its wisdom does not authorize the federal gov't to regulate dangerous abortion drugs. Because life begins at conception.
https://karireport.blogspot.com/
International disaster, gonna be a blaster
Gonna rearrange our lives
International disaster, send for the master
Don't wait to see the white of his eyes
International disaster, international disaster
Price of silver droppin' so do yer Christmas shopping
Before you lose the chance to score (Pembroke)

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 48529
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by Tero » Wed Mar 27, 2024 1:03 am

Comstock act bans all mailing of sex related stuff:
RS
Thomas was more blunt as he questioned a lawyer for Danco Laboratories, manufacturer of mifepristone: “How do you respond to an argument that mailing your product and advertising it would violate the Comstock Act?” He added the statute “is fairly broad, and it specifically covers drugs such as yours.” The lawyer responded that the law had not been enforced in decades and “I don’t believe that this case presents an opportunity for this court to opine on the reach of the statute.”

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/p ... 234994335/
https://karireport.blogspot.com/
International disaster, gonna be a blaster
Gonna rearrange our lives
International disaster, send for the master
Don't wait to see the white of his eyes
International disaster, international disaster
Price of silver droppin' so do yer Christmas shopping
Before you lose the chance to score (Pembroke)

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 48529
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by Tero » Thu Apr 04, 2024 7:55 pm

Made up "legal" tool:
De Girolami also neglects to consider that, in each of these cases, the court dishonestly manipulated the history it purported to rely on, each time ignoring briefs by historians that attempted vainly to educate the judges. (The dishonesty is nicely anatomized in Jack Balkin’s important new book, “Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation.”)

The basic problem is that tradition does not come in packaged units. Any invocation of tradition will select some aspects of the past, in a way constrained only by the writer’s inventiveness. In these cases, “tradition” is so malleable that it has no independent capacity to influence the outcome.
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4 ... icans/amp/
https://karireport.blogspot.com/
International disaster, gonna be a blaster
Gonna rearrange our lives
International disaster, send for the master
Don't wait to see the white of his eyes
International disaster, international disaster
Price of silver droppin' so do yer Christmas shopping
Before you lose the chance to score (Pembroke)

User avatar
Sean Hayden
Microagressor
Posts: 18307
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
About me: recovering humanist
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by Sean Hayden » Thu Apr 04, 2024 9:14 pm

The basic problem is that too many people wake up every day knowing how the world ought to be. You want one thing, and some other asshole wants another, and you're both producing bullshit just as fast as you can to get it. That's why the idea of freedom is so appealing, it promises to protect me from the majority of bullshit. I can choose not to engage in the dumbfuckery and pursue my own agenda instead...but alas, the shit has been spread so far, and piled so high, I can't help stepping in it. :FBM:
Imagine that. I guess it's only coincidental that you'd already be the perfect citizen in the ideal world you're selling.

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 38758
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by Brian Peacock » Sat Apr 13, 2024 11:52 am

Your neck deep in it. Time to head for higher ground?
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 48529
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by Tero » Sun Apr 14, 2024 11:44 am

SC to determine if homelessness is a crime. Oregon case up soon.
https://karireport.blogspot.com/
International disaster, gonna be a blaster
Gonna rearrange our lives
International disaster, send for the master
Don't wait to see the white of his eyes
International disaster, international disaster
Price of silver droppin' so do yer Christmas shopping
Before you lose the chance to score (Pembroke)

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 73481
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by JimC » Sun Apr 14, 2024 8:24 pm

Being anything other than a rich, white conservative US male is a crime...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
macdoc
Twitcher
Posts: 7852
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:20 pm
Location: Planet Earth on slow boil
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by macdoc » Sun Apr 14, 2024 9:01 pm

a rich, white conservative US male
is suspect as well....
Resident in Cairns Australia Australia> Yamaha MT-03 • Travel photos https://500px.com/p/macdoc?view=galleries

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 73481
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by JimC » Sun Apr 14, 2024 9:53 pm

Only by the woke... :tea:
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 48529
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by Tero » Wed Apr 24, 2024 8:57 pm

Breaking: The MAGA Supreme Court majority appears ready to rule that the right to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" doesn't extend to women with pregnancy complications or who otherwise need abortions.

This is horrifying, and it is because of Donald Trump.
https://karireport.blogspot.com/
International disaster, gonna be a blaster
Gonna rearrange our lives
International disaster, send for the master
Don't wait to see the white of his eyes
International disaster, international disaster
Price of silver droppin' so do yer Christmas shopping
Before you lose the chance to score (Pembroke)

User avatar
L'Emmerdeur
Posts: 5883
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:04 pm
About me: Yuh wust nightmaya!
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by L'Emmerdeur » Wed May 15, 2024 3:24 am

The Supreme Court of the US has become unbalanced, in more than one meaning of the word. I happened to come across a discussion here from 2019 about the decision in Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt, specifically (now retired) Justice Breyer's dissent in which he noted the majority's disregard for stare decisis (overturning a long-established decision for essentially ideological reasons) and alluded to possible future decisions which might overturn significant decisions like Roe v. Wade. Breyer was correct to be concerned, and I don't think the right wing ideologues on the court have finished with slashing away at the civil rights of Americans and paving the way for right wing authoritarian rule.

The author of the piece below discusses the overtly political motivations of Federalist Society judges Trump got onto the bench. All three of the justices he nominated to the Supreme Court were members of the Federalist Society as were 56% of the federal judges he nominated. Specifically, a letter in which 13 of these FedSoc judges announce that they will not hire Columbia University graduates as clerks because of the anti-genocide demonstration on the Columbia campus.

'Federalist Society Judges Acting Badly: An Ongoing Saga'
Many of the judges selected by Leonard Leo and Don McGhan during the Trump years have been acting very badly. A little over a year ago, I documented this terrible behavior by discussing many different judges. For example, Justin Walker was only 37 when he was nominated to be a federal trial judge despite absolutely no trial experience. What Walker possessed were ties to conservative groups, including the Federalist Society. Less than one year later he was confirmed as a judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

In his brief time as a district court judge, Walker issued a decision in a case involving COVID restrictions and prayers on Easter Sunday that reads "less like a judicial decision and more like a screed against Democrats published in an outlet like Breitbart." The first seven pages of the opinion rant about Christians and other religious groups suffering major persecution throughout the ages. The last lines of his opinion speak for themselves: "Christ’s sacrifice isn’t about the logic of this world. Nor is their Easter Sunday celebration. The reason they will be there for each other and their Lord is the reason they believe He was and is there for us. For them, for all believers, it isn’t a matter of reason; finally, it’s a matter of love."

In between these odes to religion, Walker decided to name a bunch of prominent Democrats who long ago belonged to the KKK. There is no connection between that list and any issue in the case. Walker's reward for all this religious and political posturing, as mentioned above, was a promotion to the Court of Appeals.

In that post from a year ago, I also discussed Judge James Ho's decision not to hire graduates of Yale Law School as his clerks. His reasons were quite obscure, centering around, I really don't know, maybe Yale is just too liberal a place for him. I summarized that incident as follows:
Ho was under no obligation to hire Yale clerks in the first place, so why make such a public fuss and call for other federal judges to join the "boycott?" One theory is that he is auditioning for the Supreme Court. Another theory is that he just likes publicity. But the theory does not matter. Except to the extent that actual cases before him sometimes call for judgments that are as much political as legal--which is substantially less frequently for a lower court judge than for the Supreme Court--Judge Ho has no business getting involved in culture wars and taking obvious political sides. To do so is inappropriate for a sitting federal judge.
Well, Judge Ho is back at it again. On Monday, he and 12 other Trump/Leo/McGhan Federalist Society judges sent a letter to the President of Columbia University saying they will no longer hire law clerks who attend Columbia either as an undergraduate or a law student. Again, the reasoning of the boycott is quite obscure but has something to do with vague and unsubstantiated charges of viewpoint discrimination (totally undocumented) and other aspects of how Columbia has handled the student protests over Gaza.

As an aside, it's worth noting that the letter makes various factual assertions, some of which are highly contestable and others which are flatly wrong. For example, the letter concludes by citing a supposed precedent, stating that "Justice William Brennan refused to hire law clerks from Harvard Law School because he disliked criticisms of the Supreme Court by some of its faculty." But that's nonsense, as Judge Ho and his buddies could have discovered by looking at a list of Justice Brennan's clerks. They would have then realized that from 1956 to 1965, Justice Brennan hired clerks only from Harvard; thereafter, he hired from a variety of schools, including from Harvard in most years. The tiny kernel of truth in this mostly false retelling is that for a short period of time Justice Brennan apparently was angry at Harvard over personal matters but he nevertheless consistently hired Harvard graduates throughout his career. But why let facts get in the way of a good rant?

...

These thirteen judges are acting like immature and hormonal teenagers believing that the world does and should revolve around them and their daily need to unleash terror on those they dislike. Most teens grow out of that particular mindset but not so for these and many other Federalist Society federal judges. For them, public outbursts of anger and bitterness towards the left are more than fair game; they lead to rewards and promotions. And that is what happens when the leaders of the Federalist Society get to choose our nation's judges.
On the Supreme Court in particular, an interview with a state supreme court justice:

'A State Supreme Court Justice Decries the “Horrors and Treachery” Coming From SCOTUS'
Perhaps no lower court judge has condemned the U.S. Supreme Court’s reliance on bogus history and racist values as sharply as Hawaii Supreme Court Justice Todd Eddins. In several scathing opinions, Eddins has decried the conservative supermajority’s radical reversal of settled precedent in the name of a conservative theory, originalism, that’s both dangerously retrograde and totally unworkable. In Tuesday’s Slate Plus bonus episode of Amicus, Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern interviewed the justice about his very public criticisms of SCOTUS and his embrace of state constitutionalism to limit the fallout in Hawaii.

...

Eddins: [I]t’s absolutely astounding that originalism revives the value judgments of a racist, misogynistic, homophobic society and constrains the value judgments of contemporary judges. You’re talking about times when human beings enslaved other human beings, when women were just an appendage of their husbands and had no contractual rights and no property rights. It makes no sense for contemporary society to pledge allegiance to the founding era’s culture ...

You know, when precedent is for suckers and we don’t know whether settled law will become unsettled every June [when Supreme Court decisions are announced], it’s really hard for the judiciary to function. It’s hard for judges to operate when there’s a lack of stability. And it’s not just judges; it’s the litigants, the lawyers, the law professors who have to tear up their syllabuses. I mean, it’s fundamental to our American system of justice that law works incrementally, that cases build upon cases, and that we rely on precedent. That’s the stability of the law. And when you have a group of people who come in and disregard precedent, it really unsettles things; it causes chaos. People don’t know how to operate.

The law is now constantly shifting—you said nihilism, and that’s actually what it is. I think it’s also a lack of humility, a lack of respect for all the law that’s been out there for centuries of the American judicial system. Who gave these originalists the right to kill the Constitution? And when the Constitution is killed, where do we stand? It makes it so difficult for courts throughout the land.

...

Stern: Over the last few years, conservative litigants and justices tried to strip the ability to protect voting rights from state Supreme Courts. And it’s hard not to think they were motivated by fear of state Supreme Courts acting independently, departing from the phony originalism of the Roberts court and actually protecting the right to vote, which we used to consider fundamental.

Eddins: Absolutely. And again, that’s just more dishonesty. The U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions are really destroying democracy. It’s just race to the extreme in case after case. It tears at the fabric of our nation and what I view our federal Constitution to be. And now, over the last few weeks, it seems like it’s not just personal values and preferences that they’re injecting into their jurisprudence; they also give preference to specific individuals, and that’s where the court is truly eroding confidence in the judicial system.

Stern: When you say they’re giving preference to specific individuals, you’re thinking about Donald Trump in the presidential immunity case?

Eddins: I am.

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 38758
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by Brian Peacock » Wed May 15, 2024 4:53 pm

Thanks for that L'Emmy.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
L'Emmerdeur
Posts: 5883
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:04 pm
About me: Yuh wust nightmaya!
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by L'Emmerdeur » Thu May 16, 2024 2:52 am

The right wing ideologues on the court apparently are intent on enabling a Trumpist regime. It'll be a hinge-point for American society if they and the Trumpist Republican Party are successful. Even if the relatively sane majority of the country manages to keep Trump out of office, the court is working on shaping things in favor of a Christo-fascist hegemony.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests