Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

User avatar
Mysturji
Clint Eastwood
Posts: 5005
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:08 pm
About me: Downloading an app to my necktop
Location: http://tinyurl.com/c9o35ny
Contact:

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Mysturji » Thu May 31, 2012 4:21 pm

I would suggest a surgical, precision air-strike to obliterate the Presidential Palace at a time when Assad is known to be inside (e.g. right after Kofi Annan leaves their next meeting), but considering the success rate of such missions by the USAF in recent years, they may be just as likely to hit Siberia as they are Syria.
Sir Figg Newton wrote:If I have seen further than others, it is only because I am surrounded by midgets.
Cormac wrote:Doom predictors have been with humans right through our history. They are like the proverbial stopped clock - right twice a day, but not due to the efficacy of their prescience.
IDMD2
I am a twit.

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Audley Strange » Thu May 31, 2012 5:41 pm

Alright.

The U.S. is doing the right thing. As CES points out there is a disconnect between the reality of foreign policy and the idiocy of the "Think of the babies!!" brigade. The ugly fact is that people are being killed but to intervene is to potentially exacerbate the situation where your own people might be getting killed in reprisals, not to mention get bogged down in another costly exercise and for what exactly?

If your damned if you do or don't take the path of least resistence. No one has any moral obligation to help out Syria, plus the place is a nest of vipers and deranged cultists. Who the fuck do you support?
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Ian » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:38 pm

Did the shit just hit the international fan? :ask: :?
Syrian military says it downed Turkish fighter jet
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18561219

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74295
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by JimC » Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:24 am

Ian wrote:Did the shit just hit the international fan? :ask: :?
Syrian military says it downed Turkish fighter jet
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18561219
One would assume a local commander who fired first, and thought second...

Assad needs this complication like he needs a heart attack. One thinks the commander who issued the order is not long for this world...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Warren Dew » Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:50 am

Ian wrote:
Syrian military says it downed Turkish fighter jet
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18561219
Interesting. Turkish jet flying low but fast into Syrian air space and shot down before it was identified. Sounds to me like the plane lost some instruments and was trying to get home using visual landmarks, and the Syrians mistook it for an incoming cruise missile.

The Turks could use it as a pretence if they wanted to intervene, but I don't think they want to.

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Schneibster » Sat Jun 23, 2012 6:18 am

It remains to be seen, I think. I can't imagine Turkey actually invading, but they sure could get rough, tough, and remarkably ugly. They're right next door, and could elect to supply the rebels and open their border to them, and station their army to interdict any move by the Syrians across the border. All without invading.

The Russians could try to pressure them, but that could backfire extremely badly: Turkey is a member of NATO. And NATO is not backing down to Russia this century.

AFA whether I support intervention by the US, no, not unilaterally. If NATO or the UN asks our help and puts up some money, and some of their own blood, I think we can accommodate that. Otherwise, they don't want it bad enough and are just looking for a scapegoat.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 21 guests