SEX SEX SEX

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23746
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: SEX SEX SEX

Post by Clinton Huxley » Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:05 pm

Whats wrong with a packet of hobnobs and a thumb through Wisdens?

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: SEX SEX SEX

Post by Bella Fortuna » Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:06 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:Whats wrong with a packet of hobnobs and a thumb through Wisdens?
Keep your nobs hobbed, and lord knows where that thumb has been...
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: SEX SEX SEX

Post by Tyrannical » Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:10 pm

In a perfect world their would be no annoying homosexuals.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Drewish
I'm with stupid /\
Posts: 4705
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:31 pm
Contact:

Re: SEX SEX SEX

Post by Drewish » Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:12 pm

Tyrannical wrote:In a perfect world their would be no annoying homosexuals.
Only the considerate kind that give you the reach around? :hehe:
Nobody expects me...

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: SEX SEX SEX

Post by Tyrannical » Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:17 pm

andrewclunn wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:In a perfect world their would be no annoying homosexuals.
Only the considerate kind that give you the reach around? :hehe:
Certainly not the annoying bastards that show up to protests wearing ridiculous costumes.
If Liberace can keep people wondering, so can all the rest of you.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Atheist-Lite
Formerly known as Crumple
Posts: 8745
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:35 pm
About me: You need a jetpack? Here, take mine. I don't need a jetpack this far away.
Location: In the Galactic Hub, Yes That One !!!
Contact:

Re: SEX SEX SEX

Post by Atheist-Lite » Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:26 pm

Too much sex sends you blind.
nxnxm,cm,m,fvmf,vndfnm,nm,f,dvm,v v vmfm,vvm,d,dd vv sm,mvd,fmf,fn ,v fvfm,

surreptitious57
Posts: 1057
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:07 am

Re: SEX SEX SEX

Post by surreptitious57 » Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:58 pm

Well we can get round the
problems of not being attracted
to whichever gender you are not attracted
to : first of all anal is not an absolute. You could
engage in gentler activity of a sexual nature : you all know
what I mean. A big fat hairy geezer might not get your juices flowing
but I defy any straight man here to say hand on heart that he could not find some
trans attractive. Human sexuality is a very broad church. And it is very easy by the way
if you are gay : all you need is a strap on. You would not be going anywhere near her lady garden
A MIND IS LIKE A PARACHUTE : IT DOES NOT WORK UNLESS IT IS OPEN

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: SEX SEX SEX

Post by Bella Fortuna » Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:00 pm

:pop:
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41172
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: SEX SEX SEX

Post by Svartalf » Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:03 pm

Feck wrote:
BUT
Men
are
EWWWWWWWWWW
No
EWES
are
Girls
In Wales
:mrgreen:
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41172
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: SEX SEX SEX

Post by Svartalf » Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:06 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:Stuff and nonsense. Abstinence is the way forward. Stop all the beastliness and do something useful.
mmmh... if one of the Mini Huxleys happens to be a girl, I hereby ask you for her hand in marriage (when of age), so she doesn't have to suffer from her fathers horrible positions.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Drewish
I'm with stupid /\
Posts: 4705
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:31 pm
Contact:

Re: SEX SEX SEX

Post by Drewish » Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:16 pm

surreptitious57 wrote:Well we can get round the
problems of not being attracted
to whichever gender you are not attracted
to : first of all anal is not an absolute. You could
engage in gentler activity of a sexual nature : you all know
what I mean. A big fat hairy geezer might not get your juices flowing
but I defy any straight man here to say hand on heart that he could not find some
trans attractive. Human sexuality is a very broad church. And it is very easy by the way
if you are gay : all you need is a strap on. You would not be going anywhere near her lady garden
While I do agree
that sexual flexibility
can sometimes be an asset
(especially with kinky partners).
I don't see how openness to a threesome
will help to stop the problems with overpopulation.
Nobody expects me...

surreptitious57
Posts: 1057
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:07 am

Re: SEX SEX SEX

Post by surreptitious57 » Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:28 pm

andrewclunn wrote:
surreptitious57 wrote:
Well we can get round the
problems of not being attracted
to whichever gender you are not attracted
to : first of all anal is not an absolute. You could
engage in gentler activity of a sexual nature : you all know
what I mean. A big fat hairy geezer might not get your juices flowing
but I defy any straight man here to say hand on heart that he could not find some
trans attractive. Human sexuality is a very broad church. And it is very easy by the way
if you are gay : all you need is a strap on. You would not be going anywhere near her lady garden
While I do agree
that sexual flexibility
can sometimes be an asset
(especially with kinky partners)
I don't see how openness to a threesome
will help to stop the problems with overpopulation
Well the threesome could be three
gays or three lesbians. And could also
be any combination which did not engage
in unprotected sex which incidentally does not
always have to involve penetration anyway. None
of this would increase the planet s population by one
A MIND IS LIKE A PARACHUTE : IT DOES NOT WORK UNLESS IT IS OPEN

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests