Three teens in court over Facebook poppy burning picture

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: Three teens in court over Facebook poppy burning picture

Post by Schneibster » Sat Nov 05, 2011 10:36 am

John_fi_Skye wrote:
Schneibster wrote:So it's the same justification as the Germans have for getting upset about Nazi stuff and Holocaust denial. I can hang with that. I'm glad we haven't had stuff here in the US where it's as much of an issue to where people might get killed over it. We've got slavery to deal with, of course, and the KKK, that we view kinda the same sorta way if you see what I mean, but there haven't been organized killings in decades and the last non-criminal slavery in the US was a century and a half ago, though civil rights were fought over only fifty years ago, and some people died, too. We've made movies where we pilloried such people. And movies about the capture and punishment of the people who did those killings, too. I dunno if it amounts to the same thing.
Yep. I don't know if I believe it myself, but I've heard the argument that one reason for having wars like Vietnam (and so I suppose The Falklands and Afghanistan) is to get some of those people away into another country, where they can either channel their aggression into something other than what they'd be doing at home, or they can get killed.
The ethics of that, if it's true, are:

1. Have some restriction of free speech, on hate speech, defined by the majority and regularly reviewed.
2. Kill off a portion of each generation to get rid of the hotheads.

The choice is pretty stark.

But not at all clear.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

User avatar
John_fi_Skye
Posts: 6099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 7:02 pm
About me: I'm a sentimental old git. I'm a mawkish old bastard.
Location: Er....Skye.
Contact:

Re: Three teens in court over Facebook poppy burning picture

Post by John_fi_Skye » Sat Nov 05, 2011 10:45 am

Yep. Anyway, just back from my jog and away to paint the garage. Life goes on for most of us, eh?
Pray, do not mock me: I am a very foolish fond old man; And, to deal plainly, I fear I am not in my perfect mind.

Blah blah blah blah blah!

Memo to self: no Lir chocolates.

Life is glorious.

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Three teens in court over Facebook poppy burning picture

Post by Robert_S » Sat Nov 05, 2011 10:56 am

I can burn anything in effigy here in the US. If I want to burn a few dozen Koran, then a member of the Cabinet might well just call me up and ask me nicely not to because it might put US troops in more danger.

Nobody seems to give a shit one way or the other if I burn a Bible or a US flag. It makes me think we should have a contingency plan to move Rationalia.com to servers in the US in case of emergency.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32530
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Three teens in court over Facebook poppy burning picture

Post by charlou » Sat Nov 05, 2011 1:37 pm

vjohn82 wrote:I put it to those who are not bothered by this that if a monument in the US, which recognised the loss of life on 9/11, was desecrated... how would would feel about that? After all, it's just a monument; an assembly of carbon atoms manipulated into a recognisable shape.
This kind of 9/11 monument?
no fences

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Three teens in court over Facebook poppy burning picture

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat Nov 05, 2011 1:50 pm

The poppy is vaguely reminiscent of the Stars and Bars. You can feel a lot of things about it, and people's reactions to it vary.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Three teens in court over Facebook poppy burning picture

Post by Warren Dew » Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:34 pm

vjohn82 wrote:I put it to those who are not bothered by this that if a monument in the US, which recognised the loss of life on 9/11, was desecrated... how would would feel about that? After all, it's just a monument; an assembly of carbon atoms manipulated into a recognisable shape.

What's the harm eh?
If the owner of a private monument wanted to desecrate it, no harm, of course.

We've also established pretty clearly that flag burning is fine, which is pretty cognate to your poppy burning.
Schneibster wrote:The ethics of that, if it's true, are:

1. Have some restriction of free speech, on hate speech, defined by the majority and regularly reviewed.
2. Kill off a portion of each generation to get rid of the hotheads.
Or, you know, people could teach their kids the old "sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me."

Once one understands that the symbol and the reality are two different things, it's just not that big a deal.

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Three teens in court over Facebook poppy burning picture

Post by Gallstones » Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:52 pm

When one acquires an item--say a poppy--by legal means, then it belongs to said person(s) and can be disposed of by the owner in whatever way the owner sees fit. I bet most of these poppies end up in the garbage, how is that more respectful/acceptable than burning it?

When one causes damage to property that one does not own that is vandalism and is a criminal act.

Indeed the motive is what matters because the objects--say a poppy--is an object and has no intrinsic rights to being regarded in any particular way or to being protected. Coincidentally, it is the motives of others, when displayed, where observers have control--they control their own emotions and their own reactions.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Three teens in court over Facebook poppy burning picture

Post by Gallstones » Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:58 pm

These were teenagers.
Teenagers sometimes do stupid stuff.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32530
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Three teens in court over Facebook poppy burning picture

Post by charlou » Sat Nov 05, 2011 5:22 pm

Gallstones wrote: Coincidentally, it is the motives of others, when displayed, where observers have control--they control their own emotions and their own reactions.
no fences

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: Three teens in court over Facebook poppy burning picture

Post by Schneibster » Sat Nov 05, 2011 9:04 pm

Warren Dew wrote:
Schneibster wrote:The ethics of that, if it's true, are:

1. Have some restriction of free speech, on hate speech, defined by the majority and regularly reviewed.
2. Kill off a portion of each generation to get rid of the hotheads.
Or, you know, people could teach their kids the old "sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me."

Once one understands that the symbol and the reality are two different things, it's just not that big a deal.
:sigh:
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: Three teens in court over Facebook poppy burning picture

Post by mistermack » Sun Nov 06, 2011 12:50 am

When you're dealing with stupid people, you have to work with what you've got.
There are plenty of people in Northern Ireland stupid enough to get worked up and go and hurt innocent people, just because of a taunt by equally stupid people on the other side.

It's no good saying this is just someone burning trash. It's not to the morons who live there.
You have to accept reality, and make racial taunting illegal, even if americans don't get the taunts.

Everyone in NI knows exactly what burning these poppies means, and that's good enough.
They deserve what they get, and should have the book thrown at them.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Exi5tentialist
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 4:55 pm
Location: Coalville
Contact:

Re: Three teens in court over Facebook poppy burning picture

Post by Exi5tentialist » Sun Nov 06, 2011 1:44 am

mistermack wrote:When you're dealing with stupid people, you have to work with what you've got.
There are plenty of people in Northern Ireland stupid enough to get worked up and go and hurt innocent people, just because of a taunt by equally stupid people on the other side.

It's no good saying this is just someone burning trash. It's not to the morons who live there.
You have to accept reality, and make racial taunting illegal, even if americans don't get the taunts.

Everyone in NI knows exactly what burning these poppies means, and that's good enough.
They deserve what they get, and should have the book thrown at them.
That's right. It's the poppies in people's minds that are being desecrated.

User avatar
John_fi_Skye
Posts: 6099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 7:02 pm
About me: I'm a sentimental old git. I'm a mawkish old bastard.
Location: Er....Skye.
Contact:

Re: Three teens in court over Facebook poppy burning picture

Post by John_fi_Skye » Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:52 am

Gallstones wrote:These were teenagers.
Teenagers sometimes do stupid stuff.
Plenty of the people who were kneecapped during The Troubles weren't yet 20, as were plenty of those who did the kneecapping.
Pray, do not mock me: I am a very foolish fond old man; And, to deal plainly, I fear I am not in my perfect mind.

Blah blah blah blah blah!

Memo to self: no Lir chocolates.

Life is glorious.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests